1 / 22

Outline of presentation

Old patterns and new developments: What should be the focus of higher education development over the next five years ? Ian Scott University of Cape Town October 2010. Outline of presentation. What is happening at the HE-business interface? What does the economy need from HE?

heinz
Download Presentation

Outline of presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Old patterns and new developments: What should be the focus of higher education development over the next five years?Ian ScottUniversity of Cape Town October 2010

  2. Outline of presentation • What is happening at the HE-business interface? • What does the economy need from HE? • What are we getting? • What are the obstacles to getting better? • Where are we going? • What should we – including organised business – be fighting for?

  3. What is happening at the HE-business interface? • How are graduate recruiters experiencing the fit between HE output and the needs of the economy? • Skills shortages • complex matter but ... • Graduate unemployment: some anomalies? • differential employment rates by race (Bhorat et al 2010) • co-existence with skills shortages? • Preferred institutions for recruitment • and the issue of institutional differentiation • ...........

  4. What does the country most need from higher education? • More good research • though universities are no longer the only source • More good graduates • quantity, quality, relevance and mix • What do we ascribe our shortcomings to? • So what are we getting? • understanding the national picture

  5. Participation rates* • Overall: 16% • White: 60% • Indian: 51% • Black: 12% • Coloured: 12% * Approximate gross enrolment rates (GER) derived from HEMIS 2005:all participants (of any age) as % of 20-24 age-group Source: Scott, Yeld and Hendry 2007

  6. Significance of the participation rates • GER in W Europe and N America averages 70% (UNESCO 2007) • If ‘intelligence’ is randomly distributed across populations, current intake (esp. under-represented groups) must be assumed to have good potential to succeed • The view that a large proportion of SA’s current students ‘do not belong’ in higher education is not tenable • Growth must come mainly from under-represented groups • ‘race’ still a major access and redress issue

  7. Old patterns • Undergraduate cohort graduation rates after 5 years • 30% overall (est. final graduation rate 44%) • 50% in contact university programmes • 32% in contact ‘technikon’ programmes • patterns similar in a range of qualification types and subject areas Source: DoE; Scott, Yeld and Hendry 2007 • Effects on pipeline to postgraduate study • only a tenth of the PhDs per million of population produced by developed countries

  8. Graduation within 5 years by CESM:General academic first B-degrees, excl Unisa

  9. Graduation within 5 years: Professionalfirst B-degrees, excl UNISA

  10. Equity of outcomes Graduation within 5 years in general academic first B-degrees, excl UNISA • In degree programmes, black completion rate generally less than half the white completion rate • neutralising access gains • <5% of black age-group succeeding in any form of higher education Source: Scott, Yeld and Hendry 2007

  11. Graduation in regulation time • In contact degree programmes, predominantly <30% • for black students, predominantly <15% • only 36% graduating within 4 years • Effects on learning of curricula and teaching approaches that are not effective for the majority • Unitary curriculum structures cannot meet the legitimate needs of the (necessarily) diverse intake • Who benefits from the status quo?

  12. Some implications of the performance patterns • Graduate output not meeting national needs in terms of ‘economic development or social cohesion’ (Pandor) • The equity and development agendas have converged • catering successfully for student diversity has become a necessary condition for economic development as well as social inclusion • Status quo is failing the majority • implications for all forms of development • The problem is primarily systemic • what parts of the system should address it?

  13. Alternatives to reform across higher education? • Alleviating poverty • Improving schooling • Interposing a college sector (FE or wider?) • Institutional differentiation • None of the above • therefore critical for higher education to address contributory factors that are within its control

  14. Major factors affecting student success • Curriculum structure • Educational effort and expertise • Holistic approaches to fostering student success

  15. Importance of structural curriculum reform • Curriculum as enabling or constraining framework • major determinant of effectiveness of teaching-and-learning in any particular context • SA’s inherited core framework not changed for many decades • Systemic problems requiring systemic responses • in low participation environment, such widespread failure not attributable just to ‘poor teaching’ • evidence from 25 years of foundation/extended programmes • Significance of the ‘articulation gap’ • evidence from 25 years of foundation/extended programmes

  16. Importance of structural curriculum reform (2) • What students would benefit from an alternative curriculum structure? • what proportion of the intake? • avoiding the worst of both worlds scenario • importance of understanding from bursary sponsors • Importance of curriculum reform for institutional niche and competitiveness • growing the pool of competent graduates • A majority issue • should we expand extended programmes or be more radical?

  17. Proposed new undergraduate curriculum framework • In SA context, not feasible to responsibly address equity, development or curriculum enhancement without extending the ‘formal time’ of core first degrees and diplomas for the majority of the current and future intake • Proposal: that a new undergraduate curriculum framework be established that will, inter alia: • retain the exit standards of current first degrees and diplomas • provide formal time of 4 years as the norm for core first degrees (general academic Bachelors), to meet the needs of the majority of the intake • continue to provide 3-year curricula for these degrees, for those students who can complete in this time • in general, provide the kind of structural flexibility that is needed for the diversity that will characterise the student intake

  18. Educational effort and expertise • Effort • ‘If there is a single factor that seems to distinguish colleges and universities that have truly made a difference on behalf of minority students, it is attention.’ (Carey 2008: 8) • Educational expertise necessary for developing fresh approaches to design and delivery • existing approaches not proving effective for accommodating diversity • Implications for HE policy, enabling structures, and reward systems • hearts and minds • how long might it take to change HE culture?

  19. Holistic approaches to fostering student success • What we know about the effects of affective factors on student learning • The interaction between institutional culture and student engagement • learnings from the SASSE project (http://sasse.ufs.ac.za) • Implications for bursary sponsors?

  20. Where are we going? • The evident difficulty of identifying and focusing on key goals, nationally and institutionally • Are we sure what business we are in? • Distractions • busy work, or change that doesn’t lead to improvement • “reconfiguring the institutional landscape” • now institutional differentiation? • Mobilising organised business as a key stakeholder? • spreading the debate? • developing a cohesive policy position to influence government and institutions?

  21. The Lisbon Council (with reference to the EU): • ‘First and foremost, our universities … exist to educate and prepare people to be fully-functioning, well-developed members of our advanced, post-industrial society.’ • ‘… seeking excellence in research should never be allowed to become an excuse for underperformance in the educational tasks [of higher education].’

  22. References • Carey, K. 2008. Graduation Rate Watch: Making Minority Student Success a Priority. Washington DC: Education Sector. http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/Graduation_Rate_Watch.pdf • Ederer, P., Schuller, P. and Willms, S. 2008. University Systems Ranking: Citizens and Society in the Age of Knowledge. Brussels: The Lisbon Council. • Scott, I., Yeld, N. and Hendry, J. 2007. A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. Higher Education Monitor No. 6. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education. http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000155/index.php • UNESCO (2007). Education For All Report 2008. Paris: UNESCO.

More Related