1 / 31

Data Reporting and Evaluation: Back to the Basics Liann Seiter and Dory Seidel, NDTAC

Data Reporting and Evaluation: Back to the Basics Liann Seiter and Dory Seidel, NDTAC. Agenda. Collection of Data Federal collection r equirements State collection processes Data quality Resources available for collection Reporting of Data Federal data collection systems

hina
Download Presentation

Data Reporting and Evaluation: Back to the Basics Liann Seiter and Dory Seidel, NDTAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Data Reporting and Evaluation: Back to the Basics Liann Seiter and Dory Seidel, NDTAC

  2. Agenda • Collection of Data • Federal collection requirements • State collection processes • Data quality • Resources available for collection • Reporting of Data • Federal data collection systems • Federal reporting timeline • Resources available for reporting • Evaluation • Federal use of data • State use of data • Beyond the Basics ND Coordinator responsibilities related to data collection and reporting are highlighted in text boxes

  3. Collection of Data Federal collection requirements State collection processes Data quality Resources available for collection

  4. Collection: Statutory Requirements Each State agency and local educational agency shall— (1) submit evaluation results to the State educational agency and the Secretary; and (2) use the results of evaluations under this section to plan and improve subsequent programs for participating children and youth. State and local agencies receiving Title I, Part D, funds must evaluate their programs’ impact on the ability of students: (1) to maintain and improve educational achievement; (2) to accrue school credits that meet State requirements for grade promotion and secondary school graduation; (3) to make the transition to a regular program or other education program operated by a local educational agency; (4) to complete secondary school (or secondary school equivalency requirements) and obtain employment after leaving the correctional facility or institution for neglected or delinquent children and youth; and (5) as appropriate, to participate in postsecondary education and job training programs. Become familiar with statutory requirements Source: Title I, Part D, Statute, Subpart 3

  5. Collection: Two Federal Data Collections Major Federal data collections for Title I, Part D: • Annual Child Count • Used by U.S. Department of Education (ED) to determine Title I, Part A, and Title I, Part D, funding allocations • Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) • Provides demographic and outcome data for programs receiving Title I, Part D, funds Understand the types of data requested by ED

  6. Collection: Federal Collection Requirements All Title I, Part D-funded programs must collect data to report to ED. Program categories: • At-Risk Programs—Subpart 2 only • Other Programs • Neglected Programs • Juvenile Detention • Juvenile Corrections • Adult Corrections—Subpart 1 only Resources: CSPR Forms, CSPR Guide Identify the programs receiving funds

  7. Collection: Federal Collection Requirements Each State agency and local agency program submits the following data to ED: • Student and facility counts • Student demographics • Transition services • Academic and vocational outcomes • Academic performance in reading and mathematics Be familiar with the CSPR measures

  8. Collection:State Collection Processes • State and Federal reporting requirements may differ. • Each State has its own collection tool and processes (i.e., paper and pencil, online tool, electronic files). • Data contacts at State, subgrantee,and program levels are responsible for certain aspects of data collection and reporting. Know State reporting requirements Develop systems to assist and improve the data collection process Build relationships with the data contacts in the State

  9. Collection: Data Quality Review • Data need to be trustworthy—high-quality data are accurate, consistent, unbiased, understandable, transparent. • Data quality is best achieved when timely reviews are done at the program level. • Educating subgrantees/programs on data collection can improve data quality. Assess the quality of the data received Provide training to improve data quality

  10. Collection: Data Quality ED SEA State Agency S1 LEA 1 S2 LEA 2 S2 A B 2A 1A 1B

  11. Collection Resource: CSPR Forms http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html

  12. Collection Resource: CSPR Guide “Instructional Guide to Reporting Title I, Part D, Data in the CSPR” • Overview of data submission • Table-by-table instructions • Data quality checklists • List of CSPR and EDFacts coordinators by State http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/topics/index2.php?id=10

  13. Collection Resource: NDTAC NDTAC provides multiple products and services to help State coordinators with data collection: • ND community calls • Annual CSPR Webinar • Data collection list • NDTAC presentations • Better Data, Better Decisions by Bi Vuong • Taking the Fast Lane to High-Quality Data by Stephanie Lampron and Sarah Bardack • Individual technical assistance

  14. Reporting the Data Federal data collection systems Federal reporting timeline Resources available for reporting

  15. Reporting: Federal Reporting Systems, CSPR • CSPR is a data collection instrument administered annually by ED’s Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE). • The required measures for Title I, Part D, can be found in CSPR section 2.4.

  16. Reporting: Federal Reporting Systems, EDFacts • EDFacts is an ED initiative to collect, analyze, report on, and promote the use of high-quality performance data. • Most of the Title I, Part D, data are now reported through EDFacts. Eventually, all data will be reported through the EDFacts’ online EDEN Submission System (ESS).

  17. Reporting: Federal Reporting Systems

  18. Reporting: Federal CSPR Reporting Timeline Establish reporting timelines

  19. Reporting Resource: EDFacts Coordinator List Identify who is responsible for data submission in your State and who has access to EDEN http://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/edfacts/eden/ess/edfacts-coordinators.pdf

  20. Reporting Resources: Federal Reporting Systems • CSPR • CSPR forms from ED • State CSPR coordinators • NDTAC’s CSPR guide, collection list, and annual CSPR Webinar • NDTAC’s data team individualized technical assistance about data quality during CSPR collection • EDFacts • File specifications • State EDFacts coordinators • Partner Support Center (PSC) • Phone: 877-HLP-EDEN • Email: EDEN_SS@ed.gov

  21. Evaluation Federal use of data State use of data

  22. Evaluation: Federal Use of Data • Program evaluation and performance assessments • Government Performance Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) Performance Reports • Federal Budget Requests to Congress • In response to Congressional Requests (e.g., Elementary and Secondary Education Act reauthorization) • Public dissemination Understand how ED will use the CSPR data

  23. Public Dissemination of Data ED Data Express http://www.eddataexpress.ed.gov/

  24. Public Dissemination of Data National and State Fast Facts http://data.neglected-delinquent.org/index.php?id=01

  25. Public Dissemination of Data NDTAC Annual Reports http://www.neglected-delinquent.org/nd/topics/index2.php?id=12

  26. Evaluation: State Use of Data • States must use data to improve Title I, Part D, programs, as directed by Subpart 3. • Effective uses of data at the State level for program improvement may include: • Program evaluation • Decision making • Goal setting • Data use at the subgrantee level also supports program improvement. Use data for program quality improvement

  27. Evaluation: State Use of Data

  28. Evaluation: State Use of Data Suggested areas for program improvement: • Federal performance measures • High school diploma/GED • High school course credits • Math and reading • Cost per diploma • State priorities • Specific issues related to student population

  29. Evaluation Resources: State Use of Data • NDTAC publications • Title I, Part D, Program Administration Planning Toolkit • Application Review and Needs Assessment tools • State and local Report Card resources • Data and decision-making presentations • Better Data, Better Decisions • Making the Most of Your Data: Strategies for Evaluating Your Program • Using Pre- and Posttesting To Improve Programming and Student Achievement • Using Data To Identify and Promote the Implementation of Effective Programming for Children and Youth Who Are At-Risk

  30. Beyond the Basics

  31. Beyond the Basics • Establish goals for Part D programs • Using the data, establish long- and short-term goals for programs • Expand upon the data collected • Use all available data • Use access you may have to additional data from these programs (i.e., student-level data) • Share the data • Use data collected to promote programs • Use data in program administration • Needs assessment, subgrantee monitoring, application reviews

More Related