1 / 34

Learning, Teaching, and Leading

A COMMON UNDERSTANDING OF THE KEY SHIFTS IN THE MA CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS AND THEIR IMPACT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT, AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING. Learning, Teaching, and Leading. Boston Public Schools April 26, 2012/Elementary Session. Agenda.

howard
Download Presentation

Learning, Teaching, and Leading

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A COMMON UNDERSTANDING OF THE KEY SHIFTS IN THE MA CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS AND THEIR IMPACT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT, AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING Learning, Teaching, and Leading Boston Public Schools April 26, 2012/Elementary Session

  2. Agenda • Overview of Shifts and Common Assessments • Applying the Shifts to Our Work Ahead • Text Complexity • Text Dependent Questions

  3. 3 Shifts in ELA/Literacy • Building knowledge through content-rich non-fictionand informational texts • Regular practice with complex text and its academic vocabulary • Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text

  4. English Language Learners and Text Complexity “…(ELL) instruction is usually pitched at a lower level than instruction provided for English proficient students…(and) texts used….are usually less complex, less informative, and less demanding…As a result such texts rarely if ever provide any exposure to the kind of language students need to learn and use in carrying out academic work” (Wong-Fillmore)

  5. Current and Future Assessments and the Key Shifts in ELA/Literacy (Adapted from Sue Pimental)

  6. Assessments From State Assessments That: • Measure ELA only • Emphasize narrative fiction To Common Assessments That: • Measure literacyacross disciplines • Emphasize informational texts

  7. Shift 1: Building Knowledge Through Content-Rich Informational Text • Much of our knowledge base comes from informational text • Makes up vast majority of required reading in college/workplace (80%) • Informational text harder for students to comprehend than narrative text • Yet students are asked to read very little of it in elementary and middle school (7% to 15%) • Standards moves percentages to 50:50 at elementary level and 75:25 at secondary level

  8. Assessments From State Assessments That: • Focus on reading skills—on what students can do with what they read • Assess literary terminology To Common Assessments That: • Focus on complexity of what students can read too • Measure academic vocabulary

  9. Shift 2: Regular Practice with Complex Text and Academic Vocabulary • Gap between complexity of college and high school texts is huge • What students can read, in terms of complexity is greatest predictor of success in college (ACT study) • Too many students reading at too low a level (<50% of graduates can read sufficiently complex texts) • Standards include a staircase of increasing text complexity from elementary through high school • Standards also focus on building general academic vocabulary so critical to comprehension

  10. Assessments From State Assessments That: • Use de-contextualized writing prompts (narratives) • Emphasize selected response items To Common Assessments That: • Include text-evidence based writing prompts • Emphasize technology-enhanced evidence questions

  11. Shift 3: Reading and Writing Grounded in Evidence from Text • Most college and workplace writing is evidence-based and expository in nature (not narrative) • Ability to cite evidence differentiates student performance on the National Assessment • Writing Standards ask students to respond to evidence-based writing prompts (inform/argue) • Speaking and Listening standards require students to prepare for and refer to evidence on ideas under discussion • Reading standards require students to respond to text-dependent questions with evidence-based claims

  12. ELA/Literacy Assessment

  13. C-I-A & Professional Learning • Aligning Curriculum- Instruction- Assessment • Understanding the shifts, what must we do to revise our ELA/Literacy curriculum? What opportunities are there to teach literacy in other subject areas and expand access to content knowledge? • How must we teach differently? • What about assessments? • Professional Learning • Lever to change and sustained student improvement • Quality: Every minute is critical • How must we work in different ways? • What current collaborative practices yield continuous improvement?

  14. Curriculum Support • Create text-dependent questions to accompany main reading selections in adopted ELA anthology programs with accompanying writing tasks for selected texts • Elementary: Substitute some reading selections with sufficiently complexnon-fiction texts aligned with the Social Studies curriculum • Create text-dependent questions and exemplars of close reading for ELA instruction and content area instruction that lead to common writing assignments grounded in evidence from the text (emphasize the importance of a shared responsibility for literacy)

  15. Instruction Support • Methods of teaching a close reading of texts to ensure all students have access to sufficiently complex texts in ELA/Literacy and across disciplines • Ensure students are moving up efficiently in leveled texts • Use of common rubrics in the Common Writing Assignments to reflect text types in the Standards (narrative, informational, argument) and guide instruction • Targeted on-site support will be provided based on school need

  16. Assessment Support • Predictive assessments: Trend analysis to determine instructional options for re-teaching and intervention • Student work to assess and inform instructional practice • Common Writing Assignments using a common rubric for writing • Curriculum-embedded classroom assignments • Diagnostic assessments: Match intervention to need

  17. Productive Mindset for Transformation “Professional [learning]- what little is invested is too often spent on forms of training aimed at improving things at the margins rather than developing structures aimed at causing teachers and administrators to think differently about their work and work differently because of what they come to think” (Schlechty)

  18. ELA/Literacy Shift ‘Look For’ Indicators Aligned to Teaching Standards Example from MA Educator Teacher Rubric Indicator II-D. Expectations: Plans and implements lessons that set clear and high expectations and also make knowledge accessible for all students. • II-D-3. Access to Knowledge (Proficient): Consistently adapts instruction, materials, and assessments to make challenging material accessible to all students, including English learners and students with disabilities. • ELA/Literacy Look-For: Quality of Text(s)- Is there a text(s) under discussion and is the text(s) of sufficient complexity and quality, where quality of text selection includes different considerations in different disciplines, such as coherent contribution to knowledge? Where appropriate, over the year, is there an appropriate balance of informational and literary text?

  19. Instructional Leadership as the Lever to Ensuring Student Success in Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks • Knowing, messaging, supporting, and monitoring the instructional shifts • Integrate ELA/literacy shifts with teaching standards • Use student and teacher data to provide feedback to teachers and create strategic plan for professional learning • Create collaborative groups to analyze data/student work, plan and observe instruction

  20. A Closer Look at Text Complexity • A measurement of how challenging a particular text is to read based on quantitative and qualitative factors • Lexile frameworks weigh word length, frequency and difficulty as well as sentence and text length and text cohesion • Qualitative factors, such as multiple meanings, knowledge demands, vocabulary and unconventional text structure can increase the text complexity

  21. Quantitative Measures and the CCSS New Lexiles Ranges from elementary to high school

  22. Measuring Text Complexity Appendix A in the CCSS identifies the following factors as determining text complexity: • Quantitative measures look at factors impacting “readability” as measured by particular computer program. • Qualitative measures examine levels of meaning, knowledge demands, language features, text structure, and use of graphics as measured by an attentive reader. • Reader and Task considers additional “outside” factors that might impact the difficulty of reading the text. • David Pook

  23. A Closer Look at Text Dependent Questions “Does not rely on students possessing background knowledge or experiences to answer the question; instead it privileges the text itself and the information students can extract from it. It is critical that a text dependent question originate from the text itself” (Pook)

  24. Reading Series Questions and Real Texts What book was Miss Franny reading when the bear came into the library? What did the men say when they were teasing Miss Fanny? Will Opal and Amanda ever be friends? Explain how reading the story made you feel about visiting a library? Was there ever a time where an animal scared you? Should Ms. Franny have felt embarrassed?

  25. Reading Series Questions and Real Texts What book was Miss Franny reading when the bear came into the library? Will Opal and Amanda ever be friends? What did the men say when they were teasing Miss Fanny? Explain how reading the story made you feel about visiting a library? Was there ever a time where an animal scared you? Should Ms. Franny have felt embarrassed?

  26. Text Dependent Questions Yet an equally important feature of text dependent question is that they should be framed as open ended and not leading questions, as genuine learning only happens when students can engage in an authentic conversation about the text instead of the questions (or teachers) providing the right answer immediately. (Pook)

  27. Reading Based in Evidence What do we learn about Ms. Franny in the first paragraph? Embarrassed means to feel ashamed or uncomfortable. A student might feel embarrassed if he/she fell in the lunch room and everyone laughed at them. Why is Ms. Franny embarrassed? On page. 32, what details about Ms. Franny reveal something that she and Opal have in common? The sequence of questions should not be random but should build toward more coherent understanding… that build gradual understanding of its meaning. Achievethecore.org

  28. Reading Series Questions and Real Texts This author has won prizes for her books. Why? Find a part of this story you think could win a prize. In Because of Winn-Dixie Opal tells about her experiences after moving to a new town. Think about a time that you were a newcomer to a place or situation. Now use vivid words to write a memoir about that experience. Ask students to do research on wildlife and plant life in Florida and how to safeguard libraries from “unwanted visitors”

  29. Writing Based in Evidence Culminating Task: How do Ms. Franny and Opal become friends?

  30. Play-Doh • Toys!: Amazing Stories Behind Some Great Inventions Don L. Wulffson • Lexile 920 • Common Core Appendix B • Grade 4-5, Informational Texts

  31. Play-Doh • Use the paper titled Text Dependent Questions and the CCSS • Create 3 text dependent questions. • Questions may refer to: • Word/phrase • Sentence • paragraph

  32. Share Place a marker next to each complex text dependent question.

  33. Next Steps • As you visit classrooms observe the questions teachers are using. • How often are students actually interacting with the text? • How often are teachers using text dependent questions? • How often do students provide text dependent answers. • Both questions and answers must be text dependent.

  34. CCSS Resources • Common Core State Standards (http://www.corestandards.org/) • PARCC Model Content Frameworks (http://www.parcconline.org/parcc-content-frameworks) • Student Achievement Partnershttp://www.achievethecore.org/) • Council of Great City Schools (http://www.cgcs.org/domain/72) • Aspen Institute (http://www.aspeninstitute.org/policy-work/education-society)

More Related