1 / 18

Input to Concept from Thermal Analysis Active Space Technologies GmbH – D’Appolonia

6 months Meeting 9-10 December 2010 CSGI Treviso – Italy . Input to Concept from Thermal Analysis Active Space Technologies GmbH – D’Appolonia. Summary of the presentation. Thermal analysis give necessary input to business model and LCA

hue
Download Presentation

Input to Concept from Thermal Analysis Active Space Technologies GmbH – D’Appolonia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 6 months Meeting 9-10 December 2010 CSGI Treviso – Italy Input to Concept from Thermal AnalysisActive Space Technologies GmbH – D’Appolonia

  2. Summary of the presentation • Thermal analysis give necessary input to business model and LCA • A good thermal model of the problem is the first step to achieve good and realistic results • To achive this, the choice of a good software, assumptions and parameters to be used are necessary pre-steps

  3. Summary of the presentation • Software selection • Users list • Assumptions for the models – examples • Results • Conlcusions

  4. Summary of the presentation • Software selection • Users list • Assumptions for the models – examples • Results • Conlcusions

  5. Software selection • For first simulations • To get the first (rough) results for Business model and LCA • Simple, fast and easy-to-use software • Pre-existent case-history in Building simulation → esp-r • A different software for future detailed Thermal Analysis (WP5) • Cfd software • Star CCM+ by CD-Adapco

  6. Summary of the presentation • Software selection • Users list • Assumptions for the models – examples • Results • Conlcusions

  7. Users list Market analysis  Users list User 1: • industrial building 32mx32mx5m • south oriented • 15% windows • Palermo climate • light structure • 1)       standard bitumen based membrane • 2)       COOL membrane • 3)       5cm insulation + standard bitumen based membrane • 4)       5cm insulation + COOL membrane • 5)       standard bitumen based membrane  over old standard bitumen based membrane • 6)       COOL membrane over old standard bitumen based membrane

  8. Users list User 2: • vertical multilevel building of the ‘60s, 18mx18mx3mx5 levels • cool painton east, west and south façade • south oriented • 10% windows • Palermo climate • light structure • 7)       normal paint • 8)       normal paint + cool additive   • 9)       5cm external insulation + reinforcement + normal paint    • 10)     5cm external insulation + reinforcement + normal paint + cool additive

  9. Users list • User 3: • vertical multilevel building 18mx18mx3mx5 levels • cool tileson east, west and south façade • south oriented • 10% windows • Palermo climate • light structure • bonded tiles and ventilated facade • 11)   bonded tiles • 12)   cool bonded tiles   • 13)   5cm insulation + ventilated ceramic façade • 14)   5cm insulation + ventilated cool ceramic façade * User4

  10. Summary of the presentation • Software selection • Users list • Assumptions for the models – examples • Results • Conlcusions

  11. Models assumptions Some examples: • Different heating/cooling setpoints during day and night • Different number of people during day and night • Lights heating • Equipment heating • Air infiltration/ventilation • Construction materials • No natural convection • No „ventilated“ façades User3 Heating/Cooling setpoints: 7h-19h weekdays → 19°C-24°C 19h-7h weekdays → 15°C-28°C 24h weekends → 10°C-30°C User1 Occupants: Total horizontal surface is 1024 m², an average of 36 workers between 8h and 18h. No people in during the weekend. Person working: 125W (65.5W sensible, 65.5W latent) Total: 4500W

  12. Summary of the presentation • Software selection • Users list • Assumptions for the models – examples • Results • Conlcusions

  13. User1 - results textile + reflective paint layer added Solar reflectance: 0,1→0,85

  14. User2 - results • Energy consumption per year of the whole building Solar reflectance: 0,44→0,57 +30%

  15. User3 - results Solar reflectance: 0,1→0,33

  16. User3 - results Solar reflectance: 0,1→0,33 * No „ventilated“ façades

  17. Summary of the presentation • Software selection • Users list • Assumptions for the models – examples • Results • Conlcusions

  18. Conclusions • Where the COOL materials are used alone, we obtain a reduction in the cooling energy necessary to the building and an increase in the heating energy • Even with „the loss“ in the heating energy, we have a total net advantage in the use of COOL materials (total energy delivered -the loss in heating energy is very low-) • The „classical insulation“ is able to reduce both the heating and the cooling energy needs, but it has no good impact on the cooling when it is used for roofs • Higher energy savings with higher improvements in refectance values (user1&3 better than user2) Thank you!

More Related