1 / 26

A City For Everyone Initiative Inclusive Cities Lab: Methodology

+. A City For Everyone Initiative Inclusive Cities Lab: Methodology. Victor Santiago Pineda, PhD Adjunct Professor and Chancellor ’ s Fellow Dept. of City and Regional Planning Univ. of California, Berkeley President / CEO World ENABLED / Pineda Foundation. +. 2. Outline. Motivation

hutcheson
Download Presentation

A City For Everyone Initiative Inclusive Cities Lab: Methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. + A City For Everyone InitiativeInclusive Cities Lab: Methodology • Victor Santiago Pineda, PhD • Adjunct Professor and Chancellor’s Fellow • Dept. of City and Regional Planning • Univ. of California, Berkeley • President / CEO • World ENABLED / Pineda Foundation

  2. + 2 Outline • Motivation • Concepts • Benchmarks • Best Practices • Next steps

  3. + 3 A City For Everyone Initiative Inclusive Urban Development Progress Modernity Rights

  4. + 4 Motivation: Empowering Persons with Disabilities • Increasing Participation in Local Planning

  5. Disability in City and Metropolitan Planning • Developed Award Winning Framework • Comparative Measures for Disability Policy (CMDP) operationalizes Qualitative and Quantitative Measures of Disability Rights • Tested in Global South • In consultation with government officials, development agencies and civil society organizations in the global south • In line with the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities • And with outcome document of the High Level Meeting on Disability and Development

  6. + 6 Disability in Planning and Policy • economic development • affordable housing • emergency services • public programs • infrastructure • transportation • community welfare • stimulate public discourse • Improving neighborhoods, cities, rural and/or metropolitan areas, systems • Work on subnational, national or multinational geographies. Source: Lopez, Russ. The Built Environment and Public Health. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2012. Print.

  7. + 7 Conceptual Model of Disability x f(E) D = f(FL) D FL = disability = functional limitation E = environment

  8. + 8 Conceptual Model of Disability x f(E) D = f(FL) Operates in Legal Context D FL = disability = functional limitation E = environment

  9. + GoalsDisability Inclusive DevelopmentCoordinated Public PoliciesBest Practices in line with CRPD

  10. ? ? ? 10 capacities What ends? International Norms skills ? ? money What means? tools ? Local Implementation Local Conventions ? knowledge resources ? ? assets What outcomes? A City for EveryonePlanning for Diverse Communities + • Assessment Tools

  11. + 11 Employment and Workforce Transition Physical Access Transportation Housing Education Vocational Training Civic Participation Independent Living Services Community Based Services Incongruent Disability Policy Modified Figure. Source: Navtej Dhillon and Tarik Yousef. Inclusion: Meeting the 100 Million Youth Challenge, pg. 24

  12. + 12 Inclusive Education Employment Accommodations Civic Participation Physical Access Congruent Disability Policy Independent Living Services Inclusion The Result ofPolicy Integration Modified Figure. Source: Navtej Dhillon and Tarik Yousef. Inclusion: Meeting the 100 Million Youth Challenge, pg. 24

  13. + 13 Basic Research Document Analysis Interviews Sources & Methods Focus Groups Expert Survey Attitude Survey

  14. + 14 Questions require a cross-sectorcomparative analysis Legislative Measure Executive and Budgetary Support Evaluative Criteria Administrative & Coordinating Capacity Participation of Target Groups Attitudes Towards Target Group

  15. Attitudes Affect City Life

  16. + 16 Local and Domestic Norms for Disability • Cultural Match = Acceptance • Cultural Conflict = Rejection

  17. + 17 Salience Analysis and Interpretations • “When a cultural matchexists, domestic actors are likely to treat the international norm as a given, instinctively recognizing the obligationsassociated with the norm… • When the international norm conflicts with understandings, beliefs, or obligations established in the domestic sphere, domestic actors may then find appeals to the international norm to be ineffective in garnering supportfor a particular policy.” (Cortel and Davis, 2000)

  18. Contribution: Theoretical Framework + 18

  19. Contributions:Iceberg ofInequity Basic Functioning Basic Freedoms

  20. + 20 Comparative Measures of Disability Policy (CMDP) Legislative Measure Executive and Budgetary Support Administrative & Coordinating Capacity Participation of Target Groups Attitudes Towards Target Group

  21. + 21 Expanding Definitions x (E) D = f(FL) (Eph, Es , Ei) D = f(FL) x

  22. + 22 Expanding Definitions (Eph, Es , Ei) D = f(FL) x • seeing • hearing • walking, climbing • remembering, concentrating • self-care, washing all over • communicating, being understood f(FL) Do you have difficulty

  23. A City For Everyone Initiative + 23 Multi-year Commitment • Research • Consultation • Policy Design • Consultations • Implementation and Coordination • Consultations • Monitoring and Evaluation • Consultations • Reform

  24. + 24 5/25/08 Signatories to the CRPD

  25. + 25 Signatories to the CRPD 4/17/13

  26. For More Information Please contact + • Victor Santiago Pineda, PhD • President/CEO World ENABLED • victor@worldenabled.org • +1-310-467-4556

More Related