1 / 14

Putin ’ s New Presidential Term and Russia’s Domestic Developments

Putin ’ s New Presidential Term and Russia’s Domestic Developments. Vladimir Gel’man (Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki) Finnish National Defence University, 3 May 2018. The background. March 2018 – Vladimir Putin easily re-elected for his fourth

hymank
Download Presentation

Putin ’ s New Presidential Term and Russia’s Domestic Developments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Putin’s New Presidential Term and Russia’s Domestic Developments Vladimir Gel’man (Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki) Finnish National Defence University, 3 May 2018 Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man

  2. The background • March 2018 – Vladimir Putin easily re-elected for his fourth • presidential term in office (since 2000) till 2024; • What we might expect during his new term on domestic • political and policy arenas? • Contradictions between political goals of authoritarian • rulers and policy goals of socio-economic development; • (2) Contradictions between ambitions and realities; • (3) Contradictions between outdated ideals and present-day • agenda; Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man

  3. The background Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man Re-assessing the previous trajectory of Russia under Putin: Since 2000 – creeping rise of authoritarian trends against the background of economic growth and development; The major increase of real income of Russians (2.6 times during 2000-2014) is the major source of Putin’s popularity; The major decline of democratic institutions in the 2000s was not much important in the eyes of many Russians, who enjoyed the rise of well-being and individual freedoms; BUT! – the rapid economic growth has been exhausted after 2008-2009 crisis (annual economic growth since 2008 is about 1%) 7.1.2020 3

  4. The background Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man The sudden wave of political protests in 2011-2012 (For Free Elections movement), gradual decline of Putin’s support; Response of the Kremlin – ”tightening of the screws” (tough laws and regulations, selective repressions against certain activists and organizations, etc.); Increasing fears of “color revolutions” among Russia’s rulers; 2014 – overthrow of Yanukovych in Ukraine; furious reaction in the Kremlin, annexation of Crimes and domestic “rally around of flag” (rise of Putin’s approval rate up to 80+%); 7.1.2020 4

  5. The state of affairs Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man By 2018 – consolidated authoritarian regime (rather weak opposition, effective mechanisms of political control via both coercion and co-potation, information machinery); BUT: Legal constraints (presidential term limit – what to do?); Ageing of rulers (Putin will be 72 years old in 2024); Retrospective normative ideals – “a good Soviet Union” as a role model both domestically and internationally; … and bleak prospects for economic growth (forecasts are about 1-2% for the next decade or so) 7.1.2020 5

  6. The state of affairs Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man Since 2014 – major shift of policy priorities of the Russian leadership: a shift from development to geopolitics (no way back again?); Decline of real incomes (above 10% in 2015-2017) against the background of increase of military spending; Poor state of public health, pensions, public infrastructure, etc. is recognized by political leadership Demand for the new developmental policy program (Center for Strategic Research – Kudrin); 7.1.2020 6

  7. The problems lies ahead Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man New (modest) program of policy reforms: Increase of public spending for welfare (education and health as top priorities) and infrastructure; Gradual increase of retirement age; Rise of tax rates (sales tax, individual income tax) and change of spending policy via change of budgetary rule: rise of cut-off oil price from $40 to $45 per barrel); Minor changes in the courts and judiciary; No major changes of “rules of the game” in politics; 7.1.2020 7

  8. The challenges lies ahead Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man At the same time: Vicious attacks on civil and individual freedoms (Internet use, attempts of control over educational mobility, etc.); New wave of counter-sanctions against the West (proposed ban on US-produced medications, denial of intellectual property rights, etc.); Obsessions with the threat of “revolutions”, new waves of repressions against activists, NGOs, and the media; To what extent these steps are combatable with proposals of socio-economic development? 7.1.2020 8

  9. The challenges lies ahead Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man Diverse role models of Russia’s future – economic system like in South Korea, but political system like in North Korea? Behind-the-scene struggles within the ruling coalition: siloviki vs. technocrats + business people (who will get key posts in the new government and presidential administration); Would Putin prefer development goals over new “tightening of the screws” in domestic politics and aggressive foreign policy? Answer from political science: “bad policy is good politics” (Bueno de Mesquita and Smith, 2011) 7.1.2020 9

  10. Putin forever? Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man Problems of political survival, especially in the wake of coming 2024 end of Putin’s presidential term and inevitable generational changes; Legal options - constitutional changes (amendments, adoption of the new constitution, turn to parliamentary model?); Political solution – further repressions and more repressiveness of the Russian state, rise of ideological components of the regime amid ”besieged fortress” self-positioning of Russia at the global political map 7.1.2020 10

  11. Putin forever? Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man What may shake this ”bad equilibrium” of authoritarianism, self- isolation, and sluggish growth and development? Economic problems may increase over time but as of yet collapse sounds unrealistic (unless oil prices will go down to $20 per barrel or so) – prudent macroeconomic policy by the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance; Social unrest – increasing troubles yet it is manageable by the government (localized protests, minor concessions, avoiding risks of politicization); 7.1.2020 11

  12. Putin forever? Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man Short-term prospects: more “stability” and more stagnation? Medium-term prospects: Increasing gap between expectations and realities (similarly to the Soviet Union in the 1970-80s); Low elite mobility both nation-wide and sub-nationally; Increase of emigration intentions among the educated youth; Inefficiency of ideological indoctrination (modern society versus “traditional values”); More rent-seeking and corruption (“bad governance”) For how long this “bad equilibrium” may survive? 7.1.2020 12

  13. In Lieu of Conclusions Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man Further scenarios: “Political decay” – preservation of the status quo until Putin’s physical extinction; “Iron fist” – full-scale denial of developmental goals for the sake of regime survival, extensive use of repressions, new “Iron curtain” etc.; “Regime’s collapse” – sudden breakdown due to undesired effects of exogenous shocks; “Creeping democratization” – regime change because of the pressure from below; 7.1.2020 13

  14. In Lieu of Conclusions Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man / FiDiPro Aleksanteri Institute / Vladimir Gel’man … and thanks for your interest! Comments are very welcome (vladimir.gelman@helsinki.fi) 7.1.2020 14

More Related