1 / 13

Donna Murdoch Ph.D. CAsP Human Systems Solutions, Inc. Ramon, CA

Enhanced Safety Utilizing Hypoxia Recognition and Recovery Training for Commercial Pilots and Cabin Crew. Donna Murdoch Ph.D. CAsP Human Systems Solutions, Inc. Ramon, CA. This presentation was funded by Alaska Airlines The Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device 2 was supplied by Environics, Inc.

iago
Download Presentation

Donna Murdoch Ph.D. CAsP Human Systems Solutions, Inc. Ramon, CA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhanced Safety Utilizing Hypoxia Recognition and Recovery Training for Commercial Pilots and Cabin Crew Donna Murdoch Ph.D. CAsP Human Systems Solutions, Inc. Ramon, CA

  2. This presentation was funded by Alaska Airlines The Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device 2 was supplied by Environics, Inc. I would like to thank the aircrew members from Alaska Airlines who participated in this studyand Gary Crawley my co-author.

  3. HELIOS AIRWAYS FLIGHT HCY522

  4. SUBJECTS • Alaska Airlines Aircrew Members • 13 Pilots (average flight time = 6125) • 7 had previous hypoxia training in an altitude chamber • 3 reported being hypoxic in the aircraft • 15 Experienced Cabin Crew Members • 4 had previous hypoxia training in an altitude chamber • 5 reported being hypoxic in the aircraft • All had a current physical and were qualified to fly

  5. METHODS • Pilots • Familiarization training for those with no previous hypoxia training • Up to 4 minutes at 25K ft • Data collection training run • 3 minutes at 10K ft , immediately followed by to 4 minutes at 25K ft • Each subject performed a simulated flight using a desktop simulator with altitude changes, radio calls and frequency changes directed by a simulated air traffic controller • Cabin Crew • Familiarization training for those with no previous hypoxia training • Up to 4 minutes at 25K ft • Data collection training run • 3 minutes at 10K ft while performing a simulated task requiring light exercise • Up to 4 minutes at 25K ft while performing a seated task simulating their flight duties • The student was encouraged to treat themselves and turn on their emergency oxygen when they felt hypoxic but if it became evident that they could not they were coached to turn on their oxygen by the instructor. The level of coaching was recorded.

  6. All data was collected using the Reduced Oxygen Breathing Device 2 computer controlled SpO2 and heart rate monitor mass flow controller technology mixes nitrogen and air to get the desired altitude 100% emergency oxygen is available

  7. SpO2 Values During Simulation Training N=1 N=1 N=1 N=1 N=5 N=7 N=10 N=9 N=10 N=13 N=13

  8. SpO2 Summary

  9. COACHING REQUIRED TO TURN ON EMERGENCY OXYGEN

  10. RESULTS • Time to termination of training • Pilots - mean 66 (SD 24, range 0-197) Sec at 25K • 3 of 13 terminated before 30 Sec at 25K • Cabin Crew – mean 56 (SD 59, range 0-210) Sec at 25 K • 2 of 15 terminated at 10K and 4 more terminated just after arriving at 25K • Number feeling they were adequately trained 25 • 3 felt that they needed additional training • Interval of training required • 17 thought that training should be given yearly • 3 felt that it should be given more frequently than yearly • 7 felt that it should be given between 2 and 5 years • 1 felt that it should be given once in a career

  11. Discussion • Individual tolerances and workloads accounted for the wide range of exposure times and SpO2 levels. • A majority of the aircrew felt that they should receive this training at least yearly (20) thus indicating how valuable they thought it was. • A majority of the cabin crew members thought this training should be mandatory.

  12. Conclusion Hypoxia recognition and recovery training provides another defense against catastrophic events resulting from a loss of cabin pressurization when all crew members are trained and crew coordination procedures are in place. This training should be conducted regularly for both pilots and cabin crew members. A more time sensitive measure of SpO2 should be developed.

  13. QUESTIONS Donna Murdoch Human Systems Solutions, Inc. Murdochd.hss@cox.net 619-573-7106

More Related