1 / 4

Group assignment

Group assignment. Each question should be answered within the limits of 4000 characters (blanks included) They should be sent to me by e-mail (staffan.graner@econhist.gu.se) before the text seminar 13/10

ida
Download Presentation

Group assignment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Group assignment • Each question should be answered within the limits of 4000 characters (blanks included) • They should be sent to me by e-mail (staffan.graner@econhist.gu.se) before the text seminar 13/10 • At the seminar each of you should bring a copy of the text and be prepared to present and discuss them.

  2. Design Questions (SG) • Choose two of the four articles and compare the relation between research problem, purpose and questions. • Are these concepts explicitly defined? If you don’t find an explicit purpose statement you should suggest one. • How is theory used to motivate the problem, purpose and questions in these articles? Relate to Creswell pp. 51 ff • Choose one of the two remaining articles and describe the method or qualitative procedure (as you would have done it in a proposal to conduct the investigations that the articles present). Look at the examples on page 74-78 in Creswell and use the subheadings under method or procedure that you find relevant.

  3. With the help of Swales (2004:188–192) evaluate two of the course articles by answering the following questions: • What research question(s) is (are) being addressed in this article? • What conclusions do the authors draw from this research? • What kind of evidence is offered in support of these conclusions? • Are the authors’ conclusions valid or plausible based on the evidence? Support your claim. • This concerns the analysis of all four articles. Using Swales (2004:242-264), • Identify the rhethorical moves in the Introduction sections of all the articles and compare them. Which article is best in your opinion? Motivate your choice. • Compare all four Abstracts and identify the rhetorical moves. In what way do they differ?

  4. Groups

More Related