1 / 38

Penn Live: A Case Study in Updating the Student Email System

Penn Live: A Case Study in Updating the Student Email System. Ira Winston John MacDermott Chris Mustazza University of Pennsylvania. The Decision to Outsource & The Selection Process. School of Arts & Sciences (SAS).

Download Presentation

Penn Live: A Case Study in Updating the Student Email System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Penn Live: A Case Study in Updating the Student Email System Ira Winston John MacDermott Chris Mustazza University of Pennsylvania

  2. The Decision to Outsource&The Selection Process

  3. School of Arts & Sciences (SAS) • Penn (est. 1740) is an Ivy League university in Philadelphia ranked #5 by US News and World Reports • SAS is the largest of the four undergraduate schools at Penn • 500 standing faculty in 26 academic departments • 6500 undergraduates in 52 majors

  4. The Decision to Outsource • Spring 2007 email environment • IMAP/POP/Webmail (IMP) • 75mb quotas • 5 year old Sun hardware – end of life-cycle • heavy webmail usage • 30% of students forwarding email to ISP’s

  5. The Decision to Outsource • Prevalence of good free services • Outsourcing email and other communications functions is an acknowledgement that the outsourced providers have a better product than most universities offer.

  6. The Decision to Outsource • Many students already forwarding • Given that most incoming students (90% in our case) are already using Gmail, Windows Live/Hotmail/MSN, Yahoo or AOL they are quite comfortable with these systems and anything we provide would have to better

  7. The Decision to Outsource • Freeing Resources • The resources freed up can be used to provide services that can uniquely be provided by universities.

  8. The Decision to Outsource • The student perspective • Students’ main interest is having a .EDU email address, which can be provided without providing an actual account. • .EDU nameplate valued because: • School address may look more official when writing to potential employers • Social networking sites use students’ email domain to determine which university a student attends – Facebook

  9. The Selection Process • Consultation with students • Coordination with Wharton and other schools at Penn • Legal issues

  10. Implementation

  11. Mail Flow • Once the decision was made to outsource email, the first significant implementation detail was how to manage mail flow: • Creating a new mail domain with the MX record pointing to your provider’s servers • or - • Bifurcating your existing domain* *our choice

  12. Creating a new domain

  13. Creating a new domain - considerations • Pros - • Little to no maintenance work (admin time) • No hardware requirement • Cons - • Unless all students use your new provider, you will have students withdissimilar domains • Not scalable - if you decide to partner with multiple providers later, you would have to bifurcate this new domain or create yet another one

  14. Bifurcating a domain

  15. Bifurcating a domain - considerations • Pros - • All students receive mail at the same domain • Mail relays can be dual-purpose: relaying mail to your provider and also managing forwarding to any other address a student chooses to use • Cons - • Need mail admin staff to create and maintain routing rules • Need redundant mail relays • Complicates whitelisting and SPAM filtering

  16. Penn Live Account Creation • Creating a Penn Live account is really a 2-step process: • Provisioning the account on Microsoft’s servers • Setting up a forwarder so that students’ school mail is forwarded to the Hotmail servers

  17. Penn Live Account Creation • Step 1 – User logs into a custom web front-end to create an account • Front-end interfaces with an MIIS server, server used for creating Windows Live accounts

  18. Penn Live Account Creation • Step 2 – we set the student’s mail to forward to the Hotmail servers

  19. Choices for Managing Mail • Students have several choices for managing their SAS email: • Using Penn Live • Forwarding to an account of their choosing • Students with existing legacy accounts may continue to use them

  20. Forwarding to a non-Penn Live Account • We give our students the ability to forward to any account of their choosing, using the same technology we use to forward to Penn Live • Students can log into a custom web interface that allows them to change the location where their school mail is delivered at any time

  21. Support & Findings

  22. Documentation • Re-organized help documents • Explain choices • Extensive FAQ • Client configurations • Mail Migration Techniques • Other decision support information

  23. Documentation • Penn Live Blog • Informal tone • Announcements • Bugs and workarounds • Others ephemeral issues • Provides a forum for comments

  24. Support Services • Created new position, “Project Manager for Student Technology” • Revised support model for email services • Reorganized Help Desk with new focus on support for students • Extended hours of coverage

  25. Support Services • Help issues • Relatively few questions about features • Lots of questions about forwarding • Client and mobile device configuration • Turned up some bugs, several related to Mac users

  26. Support Services • Targeted communications for specific populations • Gmail users • Hotmail users

  27. Support Services • Penn Live user survey • Identified areas of common concern (IMAP, SPAM filtering) • Learned more about usage patterns • Platform and browser preferences • Clients and mobile devices • Identified & addressed lots of individual issues

  28. How well does Penn Live meet your needs? n=287

  29. Mail Delivery Choices:College Undergraduates (6500 students)

  30. Mail Delivery Choices:College Undergraduates

  31. Findings • Choice is good but… • Choice can lead to confusion “How do I forward Penn Live to my GMail account?”

  32. Findings • Hazards of forwarding to other ISPs • Setting the “from” address • SPAM filtering • IMAP matters

  33. Findings • A non-story at Penn

  34. Next Steps • Roll-out to ~2400 graduate students • Continued analysis of usage data & help requests • Continued refinement of help docs • Calendar services • Collaboration tools

  35. Next Steps • The end of mail.sas • Moving resources to other priorities • Investing more in wireless networking • Information security • Media systems

  36. Ira Winstonira@sas.upenn.edu Chris Mustazza mustazza@sas.upenn.edu John MacDermottmacderm@sas.upenn.edu

More Related