1 / 57

Falling among older adults: Research from prediction and prevention to practice and policy

Falling among older adults: Research from prediction and prevention to practice and policy. University of North Carolina April, 2010 Mary Tinetti MD. Falling…. Falls among older adults: research from prediction to policy. First phase: acquiring the evidence

ismael
Download Presentation

Falling among older adults: Research from prediction and prevention to practice and policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Falling among older adults: Research from prediction and prevention to practice and policy University of North Carolina April, 2010 Mary Tinetti MD

  2. Falling…

  3. Falls among older adults: research from prediction to policy • First phase: acquiring the evidence • Second phase: translating evidence into practice and policy

  4. Early 1980s • Falls considered inevitable part of aging • Accidens: to happen, chance event • Little was known about fall risk • Nothing was known about prevention • Not a focus of investigation

  5. …T. Franklin Williams

  6. First phase: Acquiring the evidence • Epidemiology • Prevalence (of falls and consequences) • Prediction • Clinical trial • Effective prevention strategies • Mechanisms of effect

  7. Falls in the community: 1985 –1990 • #1: Substudy New Haven EPESE (N=350) • Representative sample of persons 75+ • Interview and exam, monthly phone calls • 1-year follow-up • # 2: Project Safety • Probability sample of 1103 persons • Yearly interview / exam, daily calendars • 3-year followup

  8. Epidemiology: Frequency • Community setting: • 30% of adults 70+ fall each year •  with age (50% by 80+) New Engl J Med, 1988

  9. Epidemiology: Morbidity • 3 year f/u of Project Safety cohort • 10% of falls → serious injury (fracture, TBI, soft tissue ) • 8% persons 70+ → ED after fall; • ½ were admitted to hospital J Am Geriatr Soc, 1995

  10. Epidemiology: Morbidity • ~1/2 of fallers unable to get up JAMA, 1995 • 1 in 5 fallers acknowledged avoiding activities because of fear of falling J Gerontol, 1994 • Extra $24,000/person Med Care, 1998

  11. Morbidity: Functional decline • Non-injurious and injurious falls * ↓ in basic and instrumental ADLs, social and physical activities *Independent of demographic, medical, cognitive, and psychosocial factors J Gerontol, 1998

  12. Morbidity: Long term nursing home stay * Independent of demographic, psychosocial, medical, functional, and cognitive status New Engl J Med 1997

  13. Epidemiology: Interpretation of study results • Falls are common • Falls are morbid • Falls are $$$$$$$

  14. Epidemiology: Predict risk

  15. Fall prediction: Geriatric syndrome • Health condition that: • Results from accumulated effect of multiple impairments / diseases • Occurs when older adults who are predisposed are exposed to precipitating challenges JAMA, 1995

  16. Epidemiology: Predict risk • Identify • Predisposing risk factors: chronic health conditions that compromise stability or  risk of injury • Precipitating risk factors: transient factors within individual or environment that  risk at time of event

  17. ↓ Strength Impaired balance, gait Vision impairment Psychoactive meds ↑ risk ≥ 2-fold ↓ Postural BP Cognitive impairment Foot problems Depressive sxs 4+ Meds. NEJM 1988; JAGS1995 Predisposing risk factors (EPESE)*

  18. 78% 60% 32% 19% 8% Risk of falls by number of predisposing risk factors

  19. Risk factors for serious injury (Project Safety)

  20. Precipitating factors* • 4+ medications • Footwear • Stairs • Unsafe behaviors * ≥ 2-fold risk of serious injury if falls

  21. Precipitating factors Falls on stairs…  risk of serious injury 10-fold

  22. By 1990s… • Much is known about epidemiology of falls (frequency, morbidity, risk factors (~50 epidemiologic studies) • Almost nothing is known about prevention

  23. National Institute on Aging Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques (FICSIT)

  24. Yale FICSIT:1992 - 1996 Aim:Compare effectiveness of targeted multifactorial intervention (TI) and usual care + social visits (SV) at ↓ falls • Hypothesis: Risk of falling  with # risk factors → risk of falling ↓ by reducing risk factors

  25. Yale FICSIT:1992 - 1996 • Design: RCT • Population: 301 community living persons 70+ with ≥ 1 fall risk factor • Intervention: Standardly-tailored multifactorial intervention targeted at each of 6 modifiable risk factors

  26. Yale FICSIT: Targeted risk factors New Engl J Med 1994

  27. Medications • Assessment • ≥ 4 medications • High-risk medications • Possible fall-related adverse medication effects • Management • Minimize medications

  28. Medications: Minimize • If: • ≥4 medications and ≥ 1 high risk med. and ≥ 1 medication sign/symptom • Then consider: • What is the net benefit vs. harm of medications for patient’s overall health • What can be eliminated or reduced? • Think total doses of all drugs

  29. Balance, gait, muscle strenth management • Gait training • Assistive device –right device used correctly • Appropriate footwear - high box, thin sole, low heel • Strength training • Balance training

  30. Yale FICSIT: Results N Engl J Med, 1994

  31. Yale FICSIT: Conclusions Multifactorial, targeted intervention: • Feasible - 85% enrolled; 80% adhered • Safe - No injuries during 20,000 unsupervised exercise sessions • Effective • ↓ % who fell by 25% • ↓ rate of falling by 31%

  32. Yale FICSIT: Mechanism of effect • RF reduction: ↓ no. of targeted risk factors → → → ↓ falls Am J Epidem 1996

  33. Yale FICSIT: Mechanism of effect • Tl>SV improvements in 3/6 RF: • Postural BP (p=0.01) • Gait / balance (p=0.004) • No. of medications (p=0.003) Am J Epidem 1996

  34. By 2001… • Much is known about fall risk and prevention, but… • Falls largely neglected outside select settings • Survey of primary care providers- ≈30% ask about falls J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003

  35. Falls among older adults: research from prediction to policy • First phase: acquiring the evidence • Falls common, predictable, preventable • Second phase: translating evidence into practice and policy

  36. Falls research: Translation • Disconnect between evidence (>60 RCTS) and practice (ignored) • Can fall risk assessment and management be imbedded in care • If so, is it effective?

  37. Connecticut Collaboration For Fall Prevention (CCFP) Funded by the Donaghue Foundation and the National Institute on Aging

  38. CCFP: Aims • To encourage health care and community providers to incorporate evidence-based fall risk evaluation/ management into their practices • To determine effect on serious fall injury and fall-related health utilization • To identify barriers and facilitators to adopting fall-related practices

  39. Recommended Practices: health care

  40. Recommended Practices: Community

  41. CCFP Methods Heighten awareness of falling as a preventable cause of morbidity: website, bus ads, posters, brochures,media…

  42. CCFP Methods: Initial tasks • Determine core intervention to disseminate • Developpractice materials (checklists; manuals; passbooks, website) • Identify clinical (and community) sites/providers • Establish referral patterns among ED, PT, homecare, 1° care • Address Medicare reimbursement issues

  43. CCFP Methods to translate research into practice • Composite of professional change strategies → enhance knowledge, skills, fall-related practices • No one strategy ideal or effective • Evidence suggests multiple strategies most effective

  44. Methods to increase fall- related practices • Buy in from leaders; champions; early adopters • Working groups; local participation in planning and implementation • Patient-mediated (patients request fall management)

  45. Methods to increase fall- related practices • Outreach visits (academic detailing) • Time consuming but necessary…

  46. % offices with ≥1 outreach visit

  47. CCFP: Aims • To encourage health care (and community) providers to incorporate evidence-based fall risk evaluation/ management into their practices • To determine effect on serious fall injury and fall-related health utilization • To identify barriers and facilitators to adopting fall-related practices

  48. Aim 2 • To compare serious fall injury and fall-related utilization rates in a region in Connecticut exposed to CCFP interventions relative to a usual care region.

More Related