1 / 21

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION. Content. Explain the Process used Talk about changes at different levels Question and Answer session What next?. Why Refresh The Model?. Introduction in 1999 said would need to check improvements introduced after Award cycles

issac
Download Presentation

INTRODUCTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INTRODUCTION

  2. Content • Explain the Process used • Talk about changes at different levels • Question and Answer session • What next?

  3. Why Refresh The Model? • Introduction in 1999 said would need to check improvements introduced after Award cycles • Responses from members to the question “How often should the Model be refreshed” – every 2 years • Some key issues have become more prominent in members/users organisations since the 1999 update

  4. Project Scope Very specific scope for project: • Fundamental Concepts - Review expression of fundamental concepts & current examples • Criteria Definitions - Ensuring definitions are full & written in an understandable manner • Sub-Criteria - Checking for applicability, relevance & appropriateness • Guidance Points - Checking for applicability, relevance and appropriateness • Criteria Weightings - Check that weightings assigned the criterion in 1989 are still appropriate • RADAR – Consideration of expanding the meaning & application of RADAR

  5. Model Refreshing Project - Inputs • From customers directly through the Management Practices Survey • Communication to all NPOs telling them about the project and asking how they would like to be involved and for any inputs • Comparison work with other Models • Licensed Trainers given invitation to contribute • General inputs gathered over last two years • Inputs from EFQM projects and people

  6. Roger Cliffe – previous project, link to Exec Committee, User input, experienced assessor Xavier Tort- Martorell – Academic input, training EMP.TQM students Richard Parker – NPO input and experienced award Manager Walter Ludwig – User input and experienced assessor, NPO input Nikos Avlonas – User input, experienced assessor, academic input Mark Webster – previous project link, user, experienced trainer and assessor Manfred Jung – link to German sustainability project, experienced assessor and trainer Diane Dibley – EFQM Project Manager Model Refreshing Project – Review Group

  7. Model Refreshing Project – Process (1) • Inputs sorted and filed in working “Inputs” document • Review team have agreed work plan & criteria for including inputs: • Fits with Project • Is Evolution not Revolution • Changes relate to Fundamental Concepts (enhance relationship between Model and Concepts) • Inputs are evidence/referenced based (new academic or experiential)

  8. Model Refreshing Project – Process (2) • Drafted & circulated proposals • Circulated drafts to NPO’s for paper review and input • Planned communications including – Ongoing NPO communications, Member mailings, EFQM Magazine and Barcelona Conference, Internet • Approval for implementing proposals given by the EFQM Executive Committee

  9. CHANGES

  10. Fundamental Concepts of Excellence • Titles stay same except Public Responsibility becomes Corporate Social Responsibility • Short expression of the concept – 1 sentence • More detail about what the concept would look like in an organisation • Bullet point benefits list updated • Re-enforce concepts as basis for the EFQM Excellence Model

  11. EFQM Excellence Model - Criteria Definitions • NO CHANGES TO MODEL CRITERIA • Definitions have been updated • Enhanced old content • Added new • Reflecting concepts

  12. EFQM Excellence Model – Criterion Parts • Still 32 • Changes to words not meaning • 1 addition and 1 combination

  13. 1a – Develop Mission, Vision & Values… 1b - are personally involved… 1c - are involved with… 1d - motivate, support & recognise.. 1a Develop Mission, Vision, Values & Ethics … 1b no change 1c interact with… 1d reinforce a culture of Excellence with the organisation’s people 1e identify and champion organisational change Leadership Current Refreshed

  14. 2a – are based on …stakeholders 2b – based on information from measurement research, learning & other creativity… 2c – are developed reviewed & updated 2d - are deployed through a framework… 2e – communicated & implemented 2a – No change 2b – based on information from… & external related activities 2c- No change 2d - are communicated and deployed through a framework of key processes Policy & Strategy Current Refreshed

  15. Guidance Points • Many changes to guidance points • Addition - pick up themes • Clarification • Removal of duplication • Training and guidance to re-enforce the message that these are guidance points NOT a standard

  16. RADAR • The text supporting RADAR has been enhanced to clarifying meaning • Results – • quantifying some, many, most – ¼, ½, ¾ • Trends for 100% no longer need to be 5 years but 3

  17. THEMES FOR UPDATES

  18. 5c – e Society as future customers 9a & b Financial Results 8 a & b Society Results 3e Caring for People Corporate Social Responsibility 1a Developing Ethics & Public responsibilities 1c Interacting with stakeholders 1d.Encouraging equal opportunities 2a Seeking stakeholders input 2c Balancing needs of stakeholders & the environment CSR 4a Key Partnerships 4b Managing Finances 4c Management of resources CSR Concept

  19. 6a Customer Perceptions 6b Indicators e.g loyalty 3b Acquiring & matching skills to match required market 2a Identifying & collecting information 2b Competitors performance 2c Reaffirming market position 1a Organisations Mission & Vision 8 a Society Image 9 Market Share 5c developing products for current & future markets 5d marketing products Market and Market Segment Market & Market Segment Customer Focus Concept

  20. 2a gathering needs & expectations from stakeholders 2b gathering other inputs for development of policy & strategy 1b process for effective Governance 4b establishing and implementing core governance process at all levels Governance Management by Process & Facts Concept Governance CSR Concept 9 Reporting Financial outcomes Non conformances

  21. Next Steps • Changes incorporated in 2004 Awards • English brochure – Introducing Excellence, Concepts, Model – beginning January • Other materials and translations through the year • Training already updated – Assessor Training and Assessing for Excellence

More Related