1 / 61

Famous Psychology Experiments

Famous Psychology Experiments. Hypothesis. Scientific method Hypothesis formulation. =. Operationalization. Operationalization: to put an experiment into a form that allows researchers to test the hypothesis Independent variable: the variable that researchers control.

Download Presentation

Famous Psychology Experiments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Famous Psychology Experiments

  2. Hypothesis • Scientific method • Hypothesis formulation =

  3. Operationalization • Operationalization: to put an experiment into a form that allows researchers to test the hypothesis • Independent variable: the variable that researchers control • Dependent variable: the variable that researchers are studying • What other questions should the researchers ask? Independent variable Dependent variable

  4. Operationalization (continued) • Confounding variables • Reliability • Validity SCARY = ? What makes a movie scary? How can we tell if a child has had a nightmare? What else might cause nightmares?

  5. Conducting the experiment Experimenting, Recording Results, Conclusion Recording the results Drawing conclusions does cause

  6. Correlation vs. Causation Correlation versus causation: just because two things are related doesn’t mean one thing caused the other Just because happened happened and then doesn’t necessarily mean that caused

  7. Replication and Theory Development • Replication • Theory development = Experiment 1 results = Experiment 2 results = Experiment 3 results = THEORY:

  8. Learning Experiments

  9. Ivan Pavlov • Classical conditioning • Experiments on dogs

  10. Pavlov’s Conclusions Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) Conditioned Response (CR) Conditioned Stimulus (CS) Unconditioned Response (UCR) because of because of

  11. Continuing Pavlov’s Experiment • Acquisition • Extinction • Spontaneous Recovery • Generalization • Discrimination Other Aspects of Classical Conditioning

  12. John Watson and Rosalie Rayner: Hypothesis, Methodology, Results • Conditioned fear into an infant • After a few tries, Albert was afraid of the rat • Presented a rat immediately followed by a loud noise, startling the baby + = • Albert generalized his fears to other furry objects

  13. Mary Cover Jones • Colleague of Watson • Deconditioned 3-year-old Peter from his fears by gradually moving a rabbit (and other things) closer to him while he was eating DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3

  14. B.F. Skinner and Operant Conditioning • Classical conditioning involves an automatic response to a stimulus • Operant conditioning involves learning how to control one’s response to elicit a reward or avoid a punishment

  15. Rates and Types of Reinforcement: Additional Experiments Fixed-ratio: food given after a fixed number of responses Variable-ratio: number of responses required to get food changes each time Fixed-interval: food given after a certain amount of time elapses Variable-interval: amount of time required to get food changes each time

  16. Negative Reinforcement and Punishment Negative reinforcement: Removing an unpleasant stimulus Punishment 1. Introducing an unpleasant stimulus 1. Unpleasant stimulus = 2. Withholding a pleasant stimulus 2. Removal of unpleasant stimulus =

  17. Albert Bandura: Hypothesis • Believed we learn through observation and imitation • Hypothesized that children would imitate aggressive behavior they observed =

  18. Bandura’s Results EFFECT OF OBSERVED CONSEQUENCE ON IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR • Children in the aggression-punished group expressed the fewest aggressive behaviors toward the Bobo dolls • Children in the other two groups expressed an equal number of aggressive behaviors and were more aggressive than children in the aggression-punished group

  19. Bandura’s Experiment, continued • Children promised rewards for imitating the adult in the film • Now, all three groups were equally aggressive • Children had learned the aggressive behavior from the film, but those who saw the adults being punished were less likely to act aggressively + = Viewing aggressive behavior Rewards for imitation Aggressive behavior

  20. Allen and Beatrix Gardner: WashoeHypothesis • Hypothesized that Washoe could learn American Sign Language

  21. Gardner and Gardner: Methodology • Began to train Washoe at the age of 11 months • Training continued for 51 months • Washoe was treated like a deaf human child: lots of toys, routines, plenty of attention • Washoe learned 151 signs during this period

  22. Gardner and Gardner: Results • Washoe learned by: • Having the Gardners placing her hands into the correct sign • Observation and imitation • Washoe was able to use her language skills to express emotions Washoe learned to sign “toothbrush”: move the index finger horizontally back and forth across the mouth to simulate brushing

  23. Gardner and Gardner: Results • Washoe eventually learned nearly 250 signs • Gardners’ hypothesis supported

  24. Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer: Memory Experiment and Hypothesis • Hypothesis: People will remember a car accident differently if given different language cues (words) about the accident

  25. Loftus and Palmer: Results • People reported the fastest speeds if the researchers had used the word “smashed” in the question • From fastest to slowest reported speeds: smashed, collided, bumped, hit, and contacted groups

  26. Loftus and Palmer: Results • One week later, subjects were asked if they had seen broken glass • 32% of subjects asked the “smashed” question said yes; 14% of subjects asked the “hit” question said yes

  27. Loftus and Palmer: Results and Implications • People remember things differently depending on the language used to describe an event (e.g., “smashed” versus “hit”) • Misinformation effect

  28. Social and Developmental Psychology Experiments The following experiments involve social and/or developmental psychology

  29. HarryHarlow: Hypothesis • Harlow observed that monkeys became very attached to their blankets • Hypothesized that monkeys became attached to sources of nurturing, even if they did not provide food

  30. Harlow’s Methodology and Results • Monkeys separated from their mothers in early infancy and raised in their own cages • Two artificial mothers: one wire and wood, one cloth - cloth mother - wire mother

  31. Harlow’s Methodology and Results • Monkeys preferred the cloth “mother,” even when the wooden one provided food

  32. Harlow’s Legacy • Bond of attachment between parent and child • A secure base from which to explore • The need for security remains with us throughout our lives

  33. Stanley Schachter: Anxiety and Affiliation— Hypothesis and Methodology • Hypothesized increased anxiety makes people want to affiliate with other people • One group expected painful shocks; the other expected very mild shocks • Asked if they wanted to wait alone or with others produces a desire to affiliate with others =

  34. Schachter: Results Expectation of severe shocks • People expecting painful shocks were more likely to want to be in groups • Seeking reassurance and distraction • Later studies: the expectation of pain leads to affiliation, but social anxiety does not made subjects want to wait in groups =

  35. Solomon Asch: Hypothesis and Methodology • Conformity experiment • Subject asked to match one of three lines to a “standard line”; the answer was obvious

  36. Conformity Normative social influence = conformity when we want to avoid rejection or gain acceptance

  37. Milgram: Further Findings • Teachers most likely to obey perceived authority figures from prestigious institutions • More likely to obey instructions when “victim” was at a distance and depersonalized • More likely to obey without role models who defied the authority figure’s orders

  38. Implications of Milgram’s Experiments • Obedience to authority can keep people from following their own morals and standards • Ordinary people can perform cruelties in the process of obeying authority figures in their daily lives • Incrementally increasing the level of shock made it more acceptable for the teachers to continue

  39. Muzafer Sherif: Boy Scout “Robber’s Cave” Experiment, Stage 1 • 22 Boy Scouts divided into two equal groups • Stage 1: lived separately, developed their own rules and leadership • At end of stage 1, began to become aware of the other group

  40. “Robber’s Cave” Experiment, Stage 2 • In stage 2, intense rivalry developed between the two groups • Researchers kept the scores close • Competed for prizes

  41. “Robber’s Cave” Experiment, Stage 3 • Researchers tried to build peace between the two groups • Best way: working together toward common goals

  42. Implications of Sherif’s Study • Peacebuilding worked well; boys ended up getting along • More difficult in other, unstaged conflicts

  43. Altruism • Why didn’t Kitty Genovese’s neighbor’s call the police earlier or help her in some other way before it was too late?

  44. John Darley and Bibb Latané: Hypothesis Hypothesized that people would be less likely to report smoke in a room if others were present

  45. Darley and Latané : Methodology and Results • Placed subjects in rooms that filled with smoke • 75% of subjects reported smoke if they were alone; 10% if they were with confederates of the researchers; 38% if they were with other subjects

  46. Darley and Latané In order for bystanders to help: • People have to notice the incident • People have to interpret the incident as urgent • People have to take responsibility for helping out But… • People are less likely to help if others are around

  47. Darley and Latané • Pluralistic ignorance: people assume someone else will help • Epileptic seizure experiment

  48. Darley and Latané • There are certain circumstances under which people are more likely to help someone in need

  49. Philip Zimbardo:Stanford Prison Experiment Recruitment and Methodology • Wanted to learn about behaviors and feelings of prisoners or guards • Set up a phony prison in a university building • Recruited male college students to participate • Randomly assigned 24 participants to role of either prisoner or guard

  50. Stanford Prison Experiment: Results • Prisoners staged a rebellion on the second day • Guards stepped up their harassment and treated rebellion “ringleaders” differently than the “good” prisoners • Prisoners told they couldn’t leave; many became anxious • Guards increased bullying tactics as they perceived prisoners to be a real threat • Zimbardo and his colleagues adapted to their roles

More Related