1 / 39

Problem 5: Microfluidics Math in Industry Workshop Student Mini-Camp CGU 2009

Problem 5: Microfluidics Math in Industry Workshop Student Mini-Camp CGU 2009. Abouali, Mohammad (SDSU) Chan, Ian (UBC) Kominiarczuk , Jakub (UCB) Matusik , Katie (UCSD) Salazar, Daniel (UCSB). Advisor: Michael Gratton. Part I:. Introduction.

Download Presentation

Problem 5: Microfluidics Math in Industry Workshop Student Mini-Camp CGU 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Problem 5: MicrofluidicsMath in Industry WorkshopStudent Mini-CampCGU 2009 Abouali, Mohammad (SDSU) Chan, Ian (UBC) Kominiarczuk, Jakub (UCB) Matusik, Katie (UCSD) Salazar, Daniel (UCSB) Advisor: Michael Gratton

  2. Part I:

  3. Introduction • Micro-fluidics is the study of a thin layer of fluid, of the order of 100μm, at very low Reynold’s number (Re<<1) flow • To drive the system, either electro-osmosis or a pressure gradient is used • This system is used to test the effects of certain analytes or chemicals on the cell colonies

  4. Micro-fluidics in Drug Studies

  5. Problems and Motivations • Due to diffusion and the cell reaction, the concentration of the analyte is changing across and along the channel • Problems: • Maximize the number of the cell colonies placed along the channels • What are the locations where the analyte concentrations are constant?

  6. Peclet Number: Dimensions of Channel and Taylor Dispersion Width: 1 cm Length: 10 cm Height: 100 µm Taylor-Aris Dispersion Condition:

  7. Governing Equation: where Boundary Conditions: Depth-wise Averaged Equation

  8. Two Channels Concentration Velocity Vorticity

  9. Two Channel x=0mm

  10. Two Channel x=25mm

  11. Two Channel x=50mm

  12. Two Channel x=75mm

  13. Two Channel x=100mm

  14. Three Channels Concentration Velocity Vorticity

  15. Three Channel x=0mm

  16. Three Channel x=25mm

  17. Three Channel x=50mm

  18. Three Channel x=75mm

  19. Three Channel x=100mm

  20. Width Changes Along the Channel

  21. Part II:

  22. Model Equation: Uptake is assumed to be at a constant rate over the cell patch. The reaction rate is chosen to be the maximum over the range of concentrations used

  23. Defining Non-dimensionalize equation: Boundary Conditions:

  24. Analytical solution An analytical solution can be found via Fourier transform: Transformed equation: Solutions:

  25. - Demand continuity and differentiability across boundary, and apply boundary conditions. - Apply inverse Fourier transform

  26. - We are interested the wake far away from the cell patch: - The integral can be evaluated via Laplace’s method: >> Taylor Expansion For large x: φ

  27. Restoration is defined as Restoration length: Larger flow velocity enhances recovery??

  28. Part III:

  29. Numerical wake computation • Advection-Diffusion-Reaction equation with reaction of type C0 • Domain size 10 x 60 to avoid effects of outflow boundary • Dirichlet boundary condition at inflow boundary, homogeneous Neuman at sides and outflow • Solved using Higher Order Compact Finite Difference Method (Kominiarczuk & Spotz) • Grid generated using TRIANGLE

  30. Numerical wake computation • Choose a set of neighbors • Compute optimal finite difference stencil for the PDE • Solve the problem implicitly using SuperLU • Method of 1 - 3 order, reduce locally due to C0 solution

  31. Conclusions from numerical experiments • Diffusion is largely irrelevant as typical Peclet numbers are way above 1 • „Depth” of the wake depends on the relative strength of advection and reaction terms • Because reaction rates vary wildly, we cannot conclude that it is safe to stack colonies along the lane given the constraints of the design

  32. Outstanding Issues: • Will vertically averaging fail for small diffusivity? • What are the limitations of the vertically averaging? • Taylor dispersion? • Pattern of colony placements? • Realistic Reaction Model? • Effect of Boundaries along the device?

  33. References • Y.C. Lam, X. Chen, C. Yang (2005) Depthwise averaging approach to cross-stream mixing in a pressure-driven michrochannel flow Microfluid Nanofluid 1: 218-226 • R.A. Vijayendran, F.S. Ligler, D.E. Leckband (1999) A Computational Reaction-Diffusion Model for the Analysis of Transport-Limited Kinetics Anal. Chem. 71, 5405-5412

  34. Thank You

More Related