1 / 13

Education of the Future: Food Systems of the World Inter-Ag 375 Spring, 2012

Education of the Future: Food Systems of the World Inter-Ag 375 Spring, 2012. Liaison Forum Wednesday, May 16, 2012. Players. Michel Wattiaux (PI) Mitch Morrey (Course TA) Barb Hamel (Librarian consultant) Barb Sisolak (Librarian consultant)

jania
Download Presentation

Education of the Future: Food Systems of the World Inter-Ag 375 Spring, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Education of the Future: Food Systems of the WorldInter-Ag 375Spring, 2012 Liaison Forum Wednesday, May 16, 2012

  2. Players • Michel Wattiaux(PI) • Mitch Morrey (Course TA) • Barb Hamel (Librarian consultant) • Barb Sisolak (Librarian consultant) • CydFreitag & DoIT Academic Technology team • 8 UW-Madison Students

  3. InterAg 375:The “Grand Experiment” • Self-directed, few formal class meetings • Location: varied (library, computer lab, virtual) • 1 credit • Multi-disciplinary • Research topic of choice relating to world’s food systems • Participate in class blog and peer evaluation • Produce scholarly, multi-media web page • Present research to class

  4. Barb & Barb • 20 hours allocation each • Met with PI and full consulting group • Met with PI to structure class calendar • Created LCP / held 2 instruction sessions at Steenbock • Maintained availability for students • Contingency planning • Participated in blog • Evaluators for mid-term & final presentations Patience & flexibility required!

  5. Students • 9 initial registrants; 1 drop • 6 undergraduates • 2 graduate students • 1 PhD candidate, background in botany • 1 Masters in Public Health student, veterinary medicine & lab research background • Majors/Areas of study: • Environment & Resources: Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies-Freshwater Ecology • School of Medicine & Public Health-Global Health • Community &Environmental Sociology • Dairy Science • Medical Microbiology & Immunology • Agronomy • Human Evolutionary Biology • Archaeology • Latin American Studies

  6. Syllabus

  7. Topics • Maya Lowland Agriculture and Indigenous Food Security Through Time • Hey, are you new here? Welcome to the Garden. (local ag. solutions for urban food security) • Agricultural Interventions for Smallholder Farmers in Central America • Application of Algae in the treatment of wastewater streams generated by food production systems.   • Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries • Diseases in Livestock and the Worldwide Food Supply • Immigrant Latino women and Foodways: exploring their relation between being an immigrant and low health status • Food Insecurity and Its Effects on Health Disparity in the US

  8. Example of Student Work

  9. Evaluation Rubric

  10. What Was Cool • Able to integrate library at point of course creation • See student product evolving all semester • Very interesting topics! • Michel very interested in our opinions, inclusive • Evaluating student work • Online interactions

  11. Where We Stressed • Uncertainty of course structure • Uncertainty of enrollment • Uncertainty of workload • Taking time & resources away from others? • “Tethered” to specific class + uncontrollable calendar + multiple priorities=can we meet this commitment? • Diversity of students, research experience (grad, undergrad) • Diversity of topics

  12. Findings • Students didn’t seek us out • Students needed more help with web page development • Librarian time ~30-40 hours each • Course dev + class time + admin overhead/presentations • Nature of class made information literacy evaluation difficult • Students feedback: positive about class • Student feedback: wanted more structure • Still waiting for final course evals from students

  13. Moving Forward • Will class occur again? • Scalability? • Assessment? • Possible model for other courses?

More Related