1 / 6

House Industrial Base Provisions An Industry Perspective July 1, 2003

House Industrial Base Provisions An Industry Perspective July 1, 2003. Summary of HR 1588 Title VIII, Subtitle B. Massive new program content reporting requirements. Buy American requirement for “critical components”. Elimination of exemptions and waivers on Buy

janus
Download Presentation

House Industrial Base Provisions An Industry Perspective July 1, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. House Industrial Base Provisions An Industry Perspective July 1, 2003

  2. Summary of HR 1588 Title VIII, Subtitle B • Massive new program content reporting requirements. • Buy American requirement for “critical components”. • Elimination of exemptions and waivers on Buy • American Act and other domestic source requirements. • 100% US machine tools on DoD major programs in 2007. • Increase Buy American Act requirement • from 50 to 65 percent. • Canada eliminated from domestic industrial base.

  3. Civil-Military Integration • The House industrial base provisions would significantly increase cost for • commercial companies selling to the Department of Defense as • contractors or subcontractors. • - Sections 811 and 812 require substantial data • gathering and reporting. • - Sections 828 and 829 would eliminate trade agreements waivers of • the BAA making commercial electronics and IT procurements • impossible. • - Integrated commercial/defense contractors would be incentivized • to split their organizations to contain cost impact on commercial • overhead • - Access to commercial technology would be hindered.

  4. International Programs • U.S. aerospace is an exporting industry • - $30 billion export surplus in 2002. • - 40 percent of industry products exported. • Current international programs at serious risk. • - Existing arrangements prohibited by House provisions • - Titanium in foreign subsystems (section 822) • - Requirement for U.S. source for critical • components (sec. 813) • - Buy American Act waivers based on TAA (sec. 828) • - U.S. machine tool requirements (sec. 826) • - Existing programs would have to be delayed and restructured • Interoperability suffers • U.S. pays full price of development • Access to foreign technology hindered • No recognition of our allies’ contributions in war on terror • - U.K. • - Israel

  5. Program Costs • Higher overhead • - Commercial/defense split in contractor organizations. • - New reporting and compliance systems will be needed. • Less cost sharing • - Less international partner sharing of development • and procurement • - Fewer commercial DoD contractors • Higher unit costs. • - Less foreign sales. • - Less competition in the supplier base. • - Prices set less by commercial market forces • - Return to milspecs and regulated cost procedures • - Costs associated with redesigning and restructuring • existing programs to meet new domestic source • requirement for critical components • Massive recapitalization costs required by machine tool provision. • Higher O&S costs as legacy systems remain in service longer.

  6. Long Term Impacts • U.S. Foreign Policy encumbered • Significant delays and cost increases on • existing programs • Transformation at risk • Fewer systems, less technology in the hands of • our Warfighters • Long-term financial viability of a private sector • defense industrial base at risk

More Related