1 / 26

Satellites and interactions

Satellites and interactions. P. A. Delamere University of Colorado. Types of interactions. Magnetized (internally generated magnetic field) Mini-magnetosphere (Ganymede) Non-magnetized Inert, no induced magnetic field and no neutral source (e.g. moon).

jemma
Download Presentation

Satellites and interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Satellites and interactions P. A. Delamere University of Colorado

  2. Types of interactions • Magnetized (internally generated magnetic field) • Mini-magnetosphere (Ganymede) • Non-magnetized • Inert, no induced magnetic field and no neutral source (e.g. moon). • Induced magnetic field due to time-varying external magnetic field (e.g. Europa and Io) • Magnetic perturbation due to interaction with neutral source (.e.g. Io, Enceladus) • Conductivity due to ionization, charge exchange, collisions • Sub-Alfvenic flow (except Titan when outside of Saturn’s magnetosphere)

  3. Ganymede: A Magnetosphere within a Magnetosphere Torrence Johnson

  4. HST observations of oxygen emissions - McGrath Ganymede Jia et al. Paty et al.

  5. Types of interactions • Magnetized (internally generated magnetic field) • Mini-magnetosphere (Ganymede) • Non-magnetized • Inert, no induced magnetic field and no neutral source (e.g. moon). • Induced magnetic field due to time-varying external magnetic field (e.g. Europa and Io) • Magnetic perturbation due to interaction with neutral source (.e.g. Io, Enceladus) • Conductivity due to ionization, charge exchange, collisions • Sub-Alfvenic flow (except Titan when outside of Saturn’s magnetosphere)

  6. Induced magnetic fields (Europa and Io) Khurana et al., 2011 Schilling et al., 2008

  7. Types of interactions • Magnetized (internally generated magnetic field) • Mini-magnetosphere (Ganymede) • Non-magnetized • Inert, no induced magnetic field and no neutral source (e.g. moon). • Induced magnetic field due to time-varying external magnetic field (e.g. Europa and Io) • Magnetic perturbation due to interaction with neutral source (.e.g. Io, Enceladus) • Conductivity due to ionization, charge exchange, collisions • Sub-Alfvenic flow (except Titan when outside of Saturn’s magnetosphere)

  8. Io’s SO2 Atmosphere 1998 Lyman-a Images NSO2 ~1016 cm-2 1999

  9. Neutral Sources Spencer et al., 2007

  10. Enceladus Dougherty et al., 2006

  11. Interaction processes Electron impact dissocation of SO2 is the fastest reaction [Smyth and Marconi, 1998] Pickup=source of energy (at 60 km/s) Tpu(O+)=270 eV Tpu(S+)=540 eV Tpu(SO2+)= 1080 eV

  12. Momentum loading (pickup) • Ionization • Charge exchange • New ions stationary in satellite rest frame • “Picked-up" by local plasma flow • Ionization adds mass • Charge exchange does not add mass (usually) • Both transfer momentum from ambient plasma to new

  13. Ionization and Charge Exchange • .CharCharge Charge exchange amplified by “seed” ionization. Results in an avalanche of reactions [Fleshman et al., 2011] Ionization limited by electron temperature [Saur et al., 1999; Dols et al., 2008]

  14. Electrodynamic consequences • Momentum loading generates currents Ionization + charge exchange

  15. Momentum transfer • Magnetic field perturbation due to “pick up” (e.g. ionization and charge exchange) • Alfven characteristic determined plasma mass density and magnetic field. vA vcor

  16. Momentum transfer • Alfven wing magnetic field topology results in forces on charged particles via Maxwell stresses. • Acceleration of iogenic plasma at the expense of torus plasma. • Ultimately, Jupiter’s atmospheric is the source of momentum and energy.

  17. Estimate of momentum loading • Maxwell stress • Plasma mass coupling rate • Momentum balance requires (ignoring upstream input, chemical processes) kg/s

  18. Momentum transfer

  19. Fresh hot ions Bagenal, [1997] Flow Galileo Magnetic field Electron Beams Y (RIo) Galileo Io Flyby - 1995 Bagenal, [1997] Flux NeVx (1010 cm-2 s-1) • Is the local interaction ionosphere-like (elastic collision dominated), or comet-like (mass loading dominated)? • Bagenal, [1997]: 200-500 (kg/s) • Saur et al., [2003]: 50-200 (kg/s) Y (RIo)

  20. Mass transfer rate (Alfven wing) Escaping Fast Neutrals (? kg/s) New plasma (50-500 kg/s)

  21. Io’s (partial) neutral torus M. Burger

  22. Energetics

  23. Precipitating electrons (100-1000 eV): ~1010-1011 W IR+UV auroral spots: 109-1010 W Power (Alfven wave) per hemisphere: 5x1011 W Io-DAM: 109-1010 W Talk by Sebastien Hess Io Interaction: ~1012 W

  24. Pickup Energetics • Pickup involves two parts: • Acceleration to corotation speed • Heating at local flow speed (on time scale of gyromotion) • Much of the ≈1 TW of power is necessary for the pickup of roughly 200 kg/s into corotational flow.

  25. Outstanding issues • How does the thermal electron temperature and hot electron beams affect the interaction? • Enceladus, Te = 2 eV (little interaction) • Io, Te = 5 eV (strong interaction) • What are the important processes that shape the extended coronae/neutral clouds? • Electron impact dissociation vs. charge exchange • What is the feedback between the neutral source and ambient plasma conditions (i.e. plasma torus)? • Enceladus’ variable plume source • Io’s volcanic activity • Under what circumstances are energetic particles (keV-MeV) important (Europa, Ganymede, Callisto)?

More Related