1 / 24

Building the Health Information Technology (HIT) Workforce for Rural Communities

Susan H. Fenton, PhD, RHIA, FAHIMA Asst. Professor, School of Biomedical Informatics Susan M. Skillman, MS; Holly Andrilla , MS; Davis G . Patterson, PhD; Stefanie Sanders, RN WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington Crossroads Conference June 5, 2013 .

jerry
Download Presentation

Building the Health Information Technology (HIT) Workforce for Rural Communities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Susan H. Fenton, PhD, RHIA, FAHIMA Asst. Professor, School of Biomedical Informatics Susan M. Skillman, MS; Holly Andrilla, MS; Davis G. Patterson, PhD; Stefanie Sanders, RN WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington Crossroads Conference June 5, 2013 Building the Health Information Technology (HIT) Workforce for Rural Communities

  2. Background • Effective implementation of EHRs and HIT is necessary to deliver the quality and payment reforms included in the Affordable Care Act. • To enable rural primary care providers to keep pace, specific workforce needs and barriers must be identified and addressed.

  3. The HIT Workforce Needsof Rural Primary Care Practices • Study Purpose: • To assess HIT workforce resources needed now and in the near future by rural primary care practices, and workforce-related barriers to implementing and using HIT • I.e., Do rural primary care practices: • need more staff with HIT skills? If so, what type? • need more health informaticists? • need more vendors and contractors to fill skill gaps?

  4. Methods • 2012 cross-sectional survey of 2,000 rural primary care practices in 13 states • Complex sample identification process (no complete list of rural primary care practices exist) • practice sites identified from physician, physician assistant (PA) and nurse practitioner (NP) professional license addresses • Mixed method (Paper questionnaire sent by mail with web response option) • States: AZ, GA, IA, ID, KY, ME, MN, OH, OK, OR, TX, VA, VT (from all US Census regions) • Rural areas identified using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes

  5. Key Questionnaire Components • EHR/HIT implementation status • EHR/HIT workforce demand • Barriers to use of HIT • EHR/HIT workforce skills available and needed • Practice characteristics (size, type, geographic location)

  6. National Trends in EHR Adoption From: Patel et al., Variation in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Readiness for Meaningful Use: 2008 – 2011. J Gen Intern Med, 2013 Feb 1 (epub ahead of print) (Note: No significant difference rural vs. urban)

  7. Responses Distribution among the 513 responding practices: • Response rates: • 34% overall (ranging by state from 25% - 51%) • By rural area type:33% large rural35% small rural36% isolated small rural

  8. Responding Rural Practices:Facility Type A higher percentage of practices in small and isolated rural areas were RHCs and FQHCs

  9. Rural Practices UsingBoth EHR and HIT Systems Differences between sub-rural area types not significant

  10. Difficulty Accessing the Internet p=0.01 among rural area types. No significant differences between Census regions

  11. Implementation of“Meaningful Use” Standards

  12. Workforce-Related Barriers to Using HIT: Education and Training

  13. Workforce-Related Barriers to Using HIT: Recruiting and Retention

  14. Workforce-Related Barriers to Using HIT:Other barriers Consultants and/or Vendors with understanding of the needs of our facility are:

  15. HIT Workforce Skills: Questions addressed • Basic skills: • Basic desktop/computer skills, operational medical terminology, patient information flow, understanding how data flow from EHR affects usefulness of information the system can provide. • Intermediate skills: • Knowledge of HIT products, contracting, privacy/security; meaningful use requirements; HIT for patient management/education; data management… • Advanced skills: • Management skills to direct staff in use of EHR/HIT systems, ability to use data from HIT systems to manage care for patient populations

  16. Workforce Skills Gaps

  17. Workforce Skills Gaps -Areas of Greatest Need

  18. Conclusions EHR/HIT Implementation in rural primary care practices: • The majority of rural primary care practices expect to have implemented EHR/HIT systems and be compliant with most “meaningful use” requirements by 2014.

  19. Conclusions Personnel needed: • Rural primary care practices expect to rely on the existing skills of their current workforce and/or obtain more training for these staff. • Few expected to hire a contractor or vendor for workforce training. Barriers: • Many practices reported that the expense of consultants and vendors was a barrier to implementing and using EHRs/HIT • Many practices reported barriers to accessing college EHR/HIT programs or said college programs were not applicable to their workforce needs

  20. Conclusions EHR/HIT skills training most needed: • Data management, analysis, report creation and data sharing • Data quality management • Compliance with meaningful use • Patient and population health management

  21. What can rural providers in Texas do? • Seek training for employees • 48 (credit + non-credit) certificatesavailable • 26 associate degree programs • 2 baccalaureate degree programs • 2 master’s degree programs • 1 doctoral degree program

  22. More Information • http://www.health.txstate.edu/him/TxHIT-workforce.html • Educational Institutions offering HIT education: http://www.health.txstate.edu/him/TxHIT-workforce/education.html

  23. Ongoing Activities • Higher Education Consortium • Texas Tech Health Science Center • University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics • Texas Women’s University School of Nursing • UT Medical Branch • Texas State University

  24. QUESTIONS? • Susan H. Fenton, PhD, RHIA, FAHIMA • Asst. Professor, UT School of Biomedical Informatics • Phone: 713-500-3931 • Email: susan.h.fenton@uth.tmc.edu

More Related