1 / 17

Second ISM working session : Monday 21 May - Friday 25 May Vienna, Austrian Academy of Science

INTEGRATED SCENARIO MODELLING, Introduction Presented by X LITAUDON & I VOITSEKHOVITCH TF Leader : G. Falchetto Deputies: R. Coelho, D. Coster EFDA CSU Contact Person: D. Kalupin. Second ISM working session : Monday 21 May - Friday 25 May Vienna, Austrian Academy of Science.

jessev
Download Presentation

Second ISM working session : Monday 21 May - Friday 25 May Vienna, Austrian Academy of Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTEGRATED SCENARIO MODELLING, Introduction Presented by X LITAUDON & I VOITSEKHOVITCHTF Leader : G. Falchetto Deputies: R. Coelho, D. Coster EFDA CSU Contact Person: D. Kalupin Second ISM working session : Monday 21 May - Friday 25 May Vienna, Austrian Academy of Science

  2. 2012 ISM Working session • First ISM working session • 26 - 30 March at EFDA-Garching together with the second week of the ITM code camp (focusing on ETS validation and application of ITM workflows for physics study). • Second ISM working session • Monday 21 (9:00) – Friday 25 May (13:00) Vienna • invitation letter for mobility support: 07 May • Our local host is Florian Koechl- Many Thanks ! • End of july 23-27: Finalisation of the ISM IAEA (mission X. Litaudonat JET)- Mobilitylettercouldbe issue on requests for thisactivity • Third ISM working: midNovember JET

  3. Participation to second ISM Working session 21- 25 May Vienna • CCFE • I. Voitsekhovitch , L Garzotti • CEA • X. Litaudon , J. Garcia, V. Basiuk, J. Urban, D. Moreau, F. Liu, B. Baiocchi • FOM • J. Citrin, D. Hogeweij • EURATOM-ÖAW/ATI • F. Koechl (LOC) • ENEA-RFX • T. Bolzonella

  4. Web page for the ISM working session (F. Koechl) • http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0125572/ISM_Vienna_2012/

  5. Agenda

  6. Tuesday–Thursday • Working session Museumszimmer at Academy building and Seminarraum at Hotel Post* with informal meeting & remote connection available if needed • Wednesday : ISM group dinner at a Viennese restaurant called Gasthaus Pfudl (http://www.gasthauspfudl.com/ ),close to the academy • Friday report

  7. Agenda – Draft -

  8. 2012 EPS Conferences ISM contribution • “Integrated modelling for tokamak plasmas: from baseline to advanced performance” • I. Voitsekhovitch et al • nOptimisation of the ITER baseline scenario • F. Koechl et al ( F4E Grant 255) • “Simulations of density profiles in JET hybrid discharges” • L. Garzotti et al • Real time control hybrid ITER scenario • F. Liu et al   • Free-boundary equilibrium transport simulations of ITER hybrid scenarios under control • J. Urban et al • A new free-boundary equilibrium evolution code, FREEBIE • S.H. Kim and J.F. Artaud • Comparative transport analysis of JET and JT-60U discharges • J. Garcia et al • Integrated modelling of JT-60SA scenarios with the METIS code • G. Giruzzi et al • Transport and Confinement in JT-60SA • E. Barbato et al

  9. 2012 FEC-IAEA ConferencesISM + ITM contribution • Modelling of Hybrid Scenario: from present-day experiments toward ITER (ISM) • X. Litaudon for the ISM group et al – overview- • Model validation and integrated modelling simulations for the JT-60SA tokamak • G. Giruzzi et al • Integrated Magnetic and Kinetic Control of Advanced Tokamak Scenarios on DIII-D Based on Data-Driven Models • D. Moreau (mainly ITPA DIII-D + ISM for ITER modelling) • Otherproposals not strictlyrelatedto ISM • Self-consistent simulation of plasma scenarios for ITER using a combination of 1.5D transport codes and free boundary equilibrium codes V Parail(F4E Grant 255) • The European Integrated TokamakModelling (ITM) Effort: Achievements and First Physics ResultsG. Falchetto et al • The European Transport Solver: an integrated approach for transport simulations in the plasma core D. Kalupin et al

  10. ISM overview paper: Modelling of Hybrid Scenario: from present-day experiments toward ITER • 1. Integrated modeling of ASDEX-U and JET hybrid scenario • Selection of ASDEX-U and JET experiments and dimensionless parameters • Current diffusion • q-profile influence on transport • Self-consistent modelling of hybrid scenario (current, thermal, particle and torque) • Modelling of hybrid termination • 2. Predictive integrated modeling of ITER hybrid scenario • ITER hybrid operational domain from 0-D modeling • Current profile optimization during current ramp-up phase • Pedestal prediction • Self-consistent integrated modeling scenario • Real time profile control

  11. ISM overview paper- Part 1 : Selection of ASDEX-U and JET experiments dimensionless parameters Action : E. Joffrin, J Hobirk? XL to provide the parameters using the same definition for JET and ASDEX in particular for the dimensionless parameters – calculate the value at mid radius or using the volume averaged quantity ?

  12. ISM overview paper-part 1 : • Current diffusion • J Garcia finalise Current diffusion simulation of JET discharges 77922,79626 79630, 76858,77933, 772801 and ASDEX 20993, 20995 using the same approximation, code, constrainetc • q-profile influence on transport • No new actions ( J Citrin) • Self-consistent modelling of hybrid scenario (current, thermal, particle and torque) • I. Voitsekhovitch, E. FableF. Koechl, L. Garzotti , J. Citrin:Bohm/gyro-Bohm and GLF23 simulation of JET pulse 77922 and ASDEX-U 20995 • Issue : overestimation of density peaking and rotation with GLF 23 and Bohm/gyro-Bohm. • Good simulations with GLF23 obtained by Irina but with cf=C ci with C~0.2-0.5 and gExB =0.5 ( best case for 77922 C =0.5, gExB=0.5) - gExB < 1 in hybrid regime compared to baseline ( role of rotation is less important compared to baseline ? ) Keep the same coefficients for JET and ASDEX-U • Modelling of hybrid termination • J. Bizarro, P. Belo – simulation of current ramp-down phase of JET hybrid discharge

  13. ISM overview paper-part 2 : • ITER hybrid operational domain from 0-D modeling • Action : J.F. Artaud, HELIOS simulation: popcon diagram, and X. Litaudon, J.F. Artaud METIS runs ( same as cases used by F. Liu & D. Moreau) and scan parameters peaking, current , density peaking, H –factor… • Current profile optimization during current ramp-up phase • No new actions ( role of ICRH ?) D. Hogeweij • Pedestal prediction • No new actions ( Ph Snyder) • Self-consistent integrated modeling scenario • J. Citrin, J. Garcia, F. Koechl, L. Garzotti : one ITER hybrid run using the new EPED constrain and GLF23 as in J. Citrin, et al, Nucl Fusion 50 (2010) 115007 • idem but including density and rotation modeling with the new constrains found by Irina on the rotation to model the JET hybrid scenario =Ci with C~0.2-0.5 and ExB =0.5 ( best case for 77922 C =0.5, ExB=0.5) • Real time profile control • F. Liu and D. Moreau – one closed loop simulation following the EPS publication

  14. On-going activities for ISM working session [1/4] • Benchmarking of new modules coupled with ETS workflows (NCLASS, GLF23, Bohm/gyroBohm model for particle transport, ECCD and NBI heating) V. Basiuk • Current diffusion in hybrid discharges: JET, ASDEX-U J. Garcia • Modelling of momentum transport in JET and ASDEX-U hybrid scenarios using the GLF23 and empirical models I. Voitsekhovitch • Finalisation of the current ramp-up paper D. Hogeweij

  15. On-going activities for ISM working session [2/4] • Predictive density modeling with first principle models for JET and ITER hybrid scenario , density peaking effect. L. Garzotti, F. Koechl, J. Garcia, B. Baiocchi , • Modelling of ELM mitigations at JET F. Koechl • Core-edge modelling of JET hybrid scenarios (to be confirmed) P. Belo, F. Koechl, I Voitsekhovitch • Modelling of ITER hybrid scenario with METIS : study effect of density peaking X. Litaudon, F. Liu, J. Garcia

  16. On-going activities for ISM working session [3/4] • ITER hybrid run using the new EPED constrain and GLF23 and including density and rotation modeling with the new constrains found by Irina on the rotation to model the JET hybrid scenario J. Citrin, F. Koechl, L. Garzotti, D. Hogeweij • Free-boundary equilibrium transport simulations of ITER hybrid scenarios under control J. Urban • Development of the ITER real time model-based profile control D. Moreau, F. Liu • Comparison and modelling of JT-60U and JET plasmas in typical operational domains J. Garcia • 1-D JT-60SA scenario modelling: implementation of the JT-60SA H&CD configuration (NBI, ECRH) in EU transport codes. T. Bolzonella,

  17. Remote meeting Regular remote meeting on Wednesday morning 10h30-12h00 CET (09h30-11h00 GMT) : • 25 Jan 2012 • 08 feb: • PreparationActivity 1 JET K1-0-36 • 22 feb • PreparationActivity 2 + 3 JET K1-0-36 • 25 Avril • 13 June ? To beconfirmed • 20 June • EPS contribution to ISM

More Related