1 / 55

Best Practices: Board Governance & Executive Compensation in Non-Profit Mental Hygiene Agencies

Best Practices: Board Governance & Executive Compensation in Non-Profit Mental Hygiene Agencies . April 2010 Report. New York State Commission on Quality of Care And Advocacy For Persons With Disabilities. Overview of Presentation. What is CQC and What Does it Do

jesus
Download Presentation

Best Practices: Board Governance & Executive Compensation in Non-Profit Mental Hygiene Agencies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Best Practices: Board Governance & Executive Compensation in Non-Profit Mental Hygiene Agencies April 2010 Report New York State Commission on Quality of Care And Advocacy For Persons With Disabilities

  2. Overview of Presentation • What is CQC and What Does it Do • Why Best Practices & Board Governance • Legal & Regulatory Environment • Best Practices • Overview of Survey Data • Case Example

  3. The Commission on Quality of Care and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities • Created in 1977 – Article 45 MH Law • Independent Oversight Agency • Oversight for all OPWDD, OMH, and OASAS licensed and contracted providers; and for impacted Adult Homes • Approximately 100 Employees

  4. Mission Statement To improve the quality of life for persons with disabilities and protect their rights.

  5. Core Activities

  6. Fiscal Bureau • Charged under NYS law to review the cost effectiveness in the management, supervision, and delivery of mental hygiene services • Investigate allegations of fraud, waste, and abuse • Conduct cost effectiveness studies

  7. Why Compensation? • Increased Public Scrutiny • Scandals • Questionable Compensation Arrangements • Current Economic Climate • Compensation Funded Primarily with Gov’t. Funds (e.g. Medicaid) • Need for Transparency and Accountability

  8. Common Threads • Inadequate Board Oversight • Executive Self-Interest • Recent Commission Investigations • PSCH, Inc (2008) • Evelyn Douglin Center (2008)

  9. PSCH, Inc. • Ex. Dir. Compensation Totaled Over $730,000 • 34% Increase Over 3 Years • Median Compensation at Similar Agencies $260,000 • Executive Director Accrued 351 Vacation Days and 400 Sick Days • Payout Due Upon Separation $673,000 Resolution – ED removed – Restitution to Agency.

  10. Evelyn Douglin Center • Over an 8 Year Period The Executive DirectorReceived $143,000 in Salary Above What Was Approved By Board • The Child of The Executive Director Charged $18,000 For Gasoline. • The Agency Provided 13 Vehicles Valued at Over $500,000 to Executive Staff • Resolution – ED removed, Internal Control Improvements

  11. Scope of Study • On-line Survey of 1,200 OMH and OPWDD Providers • 750 Responses • 658 Included in Analysis • 31 Site Visits

  12. What is Compensation? According to the IRS: Any economic benefit provided either directly or indirectly to an individual in exchange for services rendered. • Wages • Deferred compensation plans • Pension & profit sharing plans • Health insurance premiums • Employer provided auto • Expense accounts • Low or no interest loans • Housing Allowances • Tuition

  13. Legal & Regulatory Environment • Compensation Must Be “Reasonable” • New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law • N-PCL § 202(a)(12) • Fix reasonable compensation • Commensurate with services performed • IRS Intermediate Sanctions Regulations (IRC § 4958) • The amount that would ordinarily be paid for: • Like services • By like enterprises • Under like circumstances

  14. Intermediate Sanctions • Most significant event affecting Tax Exempts in over 30 years • Addressed IRS reluctance to Revoke Exempt Status • Allows IRS to impose penalty excise taxes on certain “disqualified persons” and “organization managers” engaging in “excess benefit transactions”

  15. Definitions • Disqualified Person • Any person who was in a position to exercise substantial influence over an exempt organization • Officers and directors • Key Employees • Family members of disqualified persons • Substantial contributors • Organization Manager • Any officer, director, trustee, or individual with similar powers or responsibilities

  16. Definitions • Excess Benefit Transaction • Any transaction in which the economic benefit provided by an applicable exempt organization directly or indirectly to a disqualified person exceeds the value of the consideration received in return for providing the benefit • Salary (bonuses, deferred compensation) • Fringe Benefits • Low or no interest loans • Sales and exchanges • Leases

  17. Excise Tax • Correction of Transaction • 1st Tier Tax 25% • 2nd Tier Tax 200% • Tax on Organization Managers 10%

  18. Example Executive Director of XYZ Charity, Inc. Salary $250,000 Deferred Comp. 30,000 Other Fringe Benefits 20,000 $300,000

  19. Example (continued) IRS asserts value of services at $200,000 Penalty on Disqualified Person: Excess Benefit $100,000 Excise Tax 25,000 Total $125,000 * * ($300,000 - $200,000 = $100,000)

  20. Example (continued) If transaction is not corrected: Return of Excess Benefit $100,000 1st Tier Tax 25,000 2nd Tier Tax 200,000 Total $325,000 Correction must be made by the earlier of the date of mailing of a notice of deficiency or the date on which the tax is assessed

  21. Example (continued) Penalty on Organization Manager(s): Excise Tax $10,000 ($100,000 x 10% = $10,000)

  22. Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness • The compensation arrangement must be approved in advance by an authorized body of organization • Members must be free of conflicts of interest • Use appropriate comparability data • Document basis for determination • Terms • Date Approved • Who voted for and against • Comparability data actually used • Must be contemporaneous

  23. Best Practices • Identify all forms of compensation • Use employment contracts • Obtain appropriate comparability data • Independent board approval • Good documentation • Full disclosure

  24. Best Practices • Identify all forms of compensation • Any economic benefit received • Providers routinely focus on salary alone Salary accounted for 84 % of total reported compensation

  25. Best Practices • Use employment contracts • Detail compensation arrangement • Employer/employee expectations • Personnel policies 38 % of survey respondents had employment contracts

  26. Best Practices • 3. Comparability data • Select appropriate data • Similar job titles • Similar size • Similar purpose • Geographic area • Avoid heavy reliance on a single comparable • Common sources of compensation data • Guidestar (www.guidestar.org) • Attorney General’s Charities Bureau (http://www.charitiesnys.com) • Trade associations • Compensation consultant 70 % of survey respondents reported using comparability data

  27. Best Practices • 4. Board approval • In advance of payment • Independence • Conflict of interest policy 95 % of survey respondents said the Board approved CEO compensation

  28. Best Practices • 5. Documentation • Comparability data • Deliberations • Record actual vote of each member • Date of approval 79 % of survey respondents said approval was documented in board minutes 58 % of survey respondents said the Board had a compensation committee

  29. Best Practices • 6. Disclosure • IRS Form 990 • CFR • W-2

  30. Survey Data

  31. Executive Director Compensation (Including Benefits)

  32. Statistical Results • Factors Impacting Compensation • Agency Revenue • Geographic Region • Tenure

  33. Regions Evaluated } NY City Long Island Westchester, Putnam and Rockland Counties Hudson River Valley Central/Western NY NYC and Long Island } Rest of State

  34. Tenure and Median Compensation 12 Yrs 11 Yrs 6 Yrs 14 Yrs 10 Yrs

  35. Quartile Approach • Using quartiles simply means dividing a data set into four equal parts. 75th Percentile - 50th Percentile - 25th Percentile -

  36. Case Example ABC Community Services, Inc. Employee Profile 20 Years Experience in Field 8 Years with Agency 3 Years as Executive Director Recently Completed Reorganization of Agency Improved Service Delivery Improved Financial Position MSW/MBA • Agency Located in New York City Area • Annual Revenues Totaling $17 Million

  37. Case Example

  38. Case Example 75th Percentile $280,400 • Potential Factors to be Considered by the Board • Agency Size • Tenure • Education/Experience • Performance/Achievements • Market Competition Median $208,300 25th Percentile $171,600

  39. Case Example Compensation Package: Annual Salary $150,000 Deferred Compensation 30,000 Health & Welfare Benefits 10,000 Life Insurance 5,000 Expense Account 5,000 Total Compensation $200,000

  40. Case Example Important Concepts • Include All Forms of Compensation • Use Sufficient Objective Data • Good Documentation • Comparative Data • Approval • Employment Contract • Independence

  41. IRS Form 990

  42. Form 990 Questions on Excess Benefit Transactions

  43. Form 990 Questions on Governance Policies

  44. Form 990 Questions on Compensation

  45. Form 990 as a Source for Comparables • Form 990 - Part VII • Contains compensation of officers, directors, trustees, key employees, highest compensated employees, and independent contractors • Form 990 - Schedule J • Contains compensation of officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and highest compensated employees (for those which exceed $150,000) • Form 990 – Schedule O • May contain supplemental narrative on compensation

More Related