1 / 25

March 24-26, 2003 Robert Ebel World Bank Institute Decentralization

Subnational Revenues & Intergovernmental Relations Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Reform. March 24-26, 2003 Robert Ebel World Bank Institute www.Decentralization.org. Organization of Remarks. Issues in Sequence Assignment of Revenues Among Governments

jollyj
Download Presentation

March 24-26, 2003 Robert Ebel World Bank Institute Decentralization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Subnational Revenues & Intergovernmental RelationsDecentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Reform March 24-26, 2003 Robert EbelWorld Bank Institutewww.Decentralization.org

  2. Organization of Remarks • Issues in Sequence • Assignment of Revenues Among Governments • Policy Framework/Key Principles • Fiscal Architecture • What is a Local Tax? • The Intergovernmental Menu • Linking Criteria with Assignment • Revenue Collection • Key Messages

  3. Issues in Sequence • Finance Follows Function: Assign Expenditure Responsibility • Determine Revenue Authority… • ….And the “Fiscal Architecture” • “Own” Revenue Responsibilities at the Margin • Grants and Transfers • Borrowing and Debt • Monitoring and Reporting • Size and Structure of Local Government

  4. Assignment of Revenues • Determination of which revenue sources should be assigned to subnational governments and how they are to be assigned • Includes taxes, other revenues, and intergovernmental aid • Concurrent with expenditure assignment

  5. Policy Framework • Fiscal equivalence: Each government should finance its own expenditures out of its own revenues to the extent possible. • Subsidiarity in taxation: Assign to the lowest “tier” of government that can administer the tax and for which it is not inappropriate. • Need for mix of local taxes. • No one assignment fits all. • As external factors change, so may policy

  6. Fiscal Architecture • Recognizing the “Architecture” of the Demographic, Economic and Institutional Setting • Matrix of Potential Revenue Sources (handout) • Similar Expenditure Needs Exercise

  7. What is a “Local Tax” • Who determines whether the tax is to be imposed? • Who determines the nature of the tax base? • Who determines the tax base to which the rate is applied? • Who determines the tax rate applied to that base? • Who collects the revenue and enforces the tax? • Who receives the revenue? • Measurement matters

  8. The Intergovernmental Menu Revenue Assignment • Value Added Tax • Foreign Trade Taxes • Business Income Tax • Individual Income Tax • Excises • Retail Sales Tax • Motor Vehicles • Property Tax • User Charges • Borrowing • Commercial Ventures

  9. Criteria & Scope for Local Taxation • Accountability and Transparency • Benefit/Tax-Price Link • Neutrality (Non-distortion) • Taxpayer Equity • Regional (Place) Equity • Reliability, Stability, Buoyancy/Elasticity • Administration and Compliance

  10. Accountability: • Local politicians should be responsive to the expressed preferences of the citizens. Voice and participation becomes important. Do Elections Matter? And, need they be local? Implications of the Principle: • Local officials should have the power to determine their “own” tax rates. • What about tax base determination? • And, who should administer the tax base? • The burden of taxes should be borne by local citizens. • The question of “tax exporting”. • Information as key to accountability.

  11. AccountabilityBenefits Received Benefit/Tax-Price Link To the extent possible taxes should function as a “price” for the benefits of public services that accrue to the tax payer/citizen — benefit areas (recall expenditure assignment) should be matched with financing areas. Implications • Taxes play a role similar to the quid-pro-quo of a market transaction • Adjust for local and regional variations in preferences for public goods(social welfare functions) • Spillovers (back to expenditure assignment, again) may call for (i) sub-municipal government (e.g., s.d.); (ii) local cooperation (Tripoli, Bangkok, Budapest); (iii) middle-tier governments; (iv) regional authorities. • Efficiency meets equity (rather than conflict)

  12. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-distortion) Non-DistortionTaxes should not unintentionally interfere with the private decisions of consumers, factor suppliers, and producers. That is they should be “neutral” Implications • The heart of “efficiency in taxation,” that is as difficult to achieve as it is identify Fiscal Architecture . But the guideline matters very much • Variability in rates should be allowed — this does not call for uniform rates • The key issue of price elasticity • Immobile tax bases rank high; “footloose” tax bases are a problem Interjurisdictional Tax Competition: Good or Bad? • Case for uniform tax bases: and watch out for quality of administration

  13. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality

  14. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutralityTaxpayer Equity Taxpayer Equity This requires that the burden be measured vis-à-vis some agreed upon common denominator of economic ability to pay and/or benefits received. The equity index should be based on economic criteria A Quick Agreement on Terminology Vertical Equity For Persons (Differential treatment of unequals) • Regressivity, progressivity, proportional • A presumptoin for proporitonal taxes • Should subnational units tax wealth” • Benefits taxes regardless of “gressivity (?) Horizontal Equity (Equal Treatment of Equals) • Individuals • Businesses

  15. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer Equity … and Measurement • Individuals: Income and additions to wealth (broad vs. narrow income) • Businesses • Gross Product (if one can estimate it) • The Key issue of multi-jurisdictional apportionment

  16. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer EquityRegional (Place ) Considerations Regional (Place) and Efficiency Local tax bases that are unevenly distributed across jurisdictions are not suited for regional use if they entail large regional inequities. Implications • This calls for good judgment: much is pinned on “what matters” for social fairness and national cohesion (from geographic distribution of natural resources to option demand) • This criterion may contradict the neutrality argument that views immobility of a tax base as efficiency enhancing • But, it is not-inconsistent with the benefits received argument

  17. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer Equity Implications cont’d • Regulation and intergovernmental revenue sharing comes into play; intergovernmental structure and nation building • What about multinational natural resources? (common property problem)

  18. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer EquityRegional EquityStability & Buoyancy Reliability, Stability, Buoyancy/Elasticity Question: what should be the elasticity: “Automatic” changes in Revenues = % Change in Yield Change in some economic base Implications • The tradeoff is evident; stability vs. buoyancy • Not to be confused with “adequacy” • Stability is conducive to competitiveness (private investment) • This topic also goes to the intergovernmental grant pool

  19. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer EquityRegional EquityStability, Buoyancy

  20. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer EquityRegional EquityStability, Buoyancy Administration & Compliance Administration and Compliance Taxes and tax systems should be transparently administered at low cost and without placing an undue burden on the taxpayer (business and individual) Implications • Keep it simple: especially locally • What may be optimal to the economist may simply not “work” • Citizens should have a tax system they can understand and control • “Achilles heel” of subnational Credit-Invoice VAT • Standardized Tax Bases • Cash Flow accounting may be preferable to accruals

  21. AccountabilityBenefits – ReceivedNeutrality (Non-Distortion)Taxpayer EquityRegional EquityStabilityAdministration & Compliance Implications cont’d • Easily identifiable (“simple”) tax bases (e.g., turnover, head) may be in conflict with other criteria); but there are some consistencies as well • Complexity may foster corruption

  22. Improving Revenue Collections • Contracting out local tax administration • The temptation of the octroi • Why focus on property taxes? • Improve collections of other taxes and fees • Enhance user charges and cost recovery

  23. Key Messages • The Nature of “Own” Revenues • The Assignment Question • Then the Fiscal Architecture • Which Revenue Source and Why • Balancing the Policy tradeoffs • Administration

More Related