1 / 12

Making Enrollment Management Policy Work

Making Enrollment Management Policy Work. December 1, 2009. The Usual Goals of Enrollment Management in the CSU. Achieve the funded enrollment targets (FTES) Maintain or increase diversity Facilitate Graduation. Enrollment Management is about more than ADMISSIONS!.

josiah
Download Presentation

Making Enrollment Management Policy Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Making Enrollment Management Policy Work December 1, 2009

  2. The Usual Goals of Enrollment Management in the CSU • Achieve the funded enrollment targets (FTES) • Maintain or increase diversity • Facilitate Graduation

  3. Enrollment Management is about more than ADMISSIONS! Enrollment management is about optimizing resources to in a timely fashion to produce graduates, who are so pleased with their college experience, that they: • Praise their alma mater in words and deeds, • Contribute to the annual fund annually, • Encourage others to attend the university, and finally • Include the university in their will.

  4. Achieving Enrollment targets involves the effective interplay of : • Recruitment/outreach • Timely admissions • Timely financial aid • Yield activities • Retention, e.g. advising • Graduation • Replacement of graduates

  5. Issues that often “overlay” enrollment management • Residence hall occupancy rates • Debt Service • Ethnic and SES Diversity • Distribution across academic units • Societal/economic needs • Academic “inventory control”

  6. Recent Additions to the CSU Enrollment Management “toolbox” • Reduction in exceptional admissions • Consideration of Dual admissions • System-wide Impaction • An option for currently un-impacted campuses • Approved for College Year 2009-2010 and probably until state funding of demand resumes

  7. So, You Think You Want to Use “Systemwide” impaction for Fall 2009! • Define a local area (by high schools or CCs); • Separate timely applications into two “piles”; • Provisionally admit local area applicants, who meet CSU minima; • Place other applicants in a wait list and admit as needed to achieve target, and • Re-route un-accomodated, but admissible applicants to open CSU campuses

  8. Our Colleagues Share re Local areas and wait-listing • Sandra Cook – SDSU “Route 56 is the new Route 66” • Darren Bush/Nathan Evans - CSUSM “Wait listing” for Enrollment Planning Precision • Jane Sweetland/Ginger Reyes- CSUCI “Wait listing”: What we learned last year”

  9. Newly emphasized CSU EM tools Rescission of admissions offers Deposits and/or mandatory orientation Coordination with housing Yield management • Return of the “Forbidden Four” • Admissions Priorities (Ed Code 66202) • “Disquals” as per EO 1038

  10. Regional Team Tasks Each Campus Each Region Describe at least one action that will be taken by the team to facilitate each team member/campus’ achieving (but not exceeding) its funded targets for Fall 2009. 1) • List as least one (but no more than two) specific actions, which will manage FTES enrollments down/up to funded targets for Fall 2009. • 1) ? • 2) ?

  11. Fall 2008 versus Fall 2009 • Fall 2008 headcounts • First-time Freshmen • _________ • Lower Div Transfers • _________ • Upper Div Transfers • __________ • Fall 2009 “goals” • First-time Freshmen • __________ • Lower Div Transfers • __________ • Upper Div Transfers • __________

  12. www.calstate.edu

More Related