Program Review Training Workshop

1. Program Review Training Workshop August 2012

2. 2013 Program Reviews Slated • Reading (1-9-13) • Humanities & Literature (1-9-13) • Anthropology (2-8-13) • History (2-8-13) • Business Administration, Marketing & Management (2-8-13) • DMS General (3-6-13) • DMS Vascular (3-6-13) • Education (4-10-13) Dates Due to Karen Marler for Academic Council

3. Your Experiences with Program Review?

4. Program Review Revision Team Matt Fall Kristen Buttigieg Nancy Miller Rebekah Woods • Joe Shackelford • Martha Petry • Geri Jacobs • Kristi Laird • Denise Geisman • Dave Fitzgerald • Chris Beacco • Todd Butler • Jeremy Frew

5. Program Review Improvement Outcomes • Aligning Program Review categories with AQIP (Balanced Scorecard/Stakeholders/Data Analysis of Student Learning, Growth, Program Needs) • Voicing department and discipline curricular and co-curricular needs • Improving processes for program review reading, delivery, feedback, action, and institutional decision-making!

6. Balanced Scorecard

7. StudyDatapre-populated by IR/Deans Office/HR/Business Office Program Review Metrics: • Course Success • Awards Conferred • Student Satisfaction • Student Engagement • Graduate Satisfaction • Percent of Seats Filled • HQV Course Participation • ADO Reporting • Enrollment – Billing Contact Hours • Enrollment – Unduplicated Headcount • BCH Taught by FT Faculty • Cost per BCH • Faculty with HLC Min Degree Requirement

8. Discover, Analyze, Act, Inspire

9. The Process

10. Another View of the Academic Program Review Process…

11. Timelines for disciplines whose reviews are due in January and February 2012 Reconvene: Sept. 18, 2012 2-4 pm JW 201 Receive Data Back, Delve into Data Analysis Oct. 19, 2012 10-Noon JW 201 Touching Base, Q & A August:Program/Discipline Review Training Workshop • Create Discipline Team Leader and Team members • Create Timeline September: Complete Course Reviews • Plug in Data; Analyze Data • Conduct Focus Groups (current students, graduates/employers) • Hold Cross Curricular Focus Groups to assess other discipline needs/concerns October and November: • Design Action Plans • Share Progress Milestone checkpoints with Deans December: • Finalize Review • Present full Review to Executive Dean, Dean, team members and other relevant parties • Checkpoints with Deans January – February: • Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council

12. Timelines for disciplines whose reviews are due in March and April 2013 Reconvene: Sept. 18, 2012 2-4 pm JW 201 Receive Data Back, Delve into Data Analysis Nov. 16, 2012 10-Noon JW 201 Touching Base, Q & A August/September: • Create Program Review Team • Design Specific Discipline timelines September/October: Complete Course Reviews/ Data Analysis October/November: • Conduct Stakeholder Focus Groups: Students, Grads, Employers, Advisory Councils • Meet with Other Disciplines for Co-Curricular needs/concerns December: • Plug in Data • Initial Meeting with Executive Deans—Questions/Concerns/ Milestone Checklist January and February: • Design Action Plans • Complete all aspects of the Program Review March and April • Finalize Review • Present full Review to Executive Dean, Dean, team members and other relevant parties • checkpoints with Deans; D • Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council

13. Your input is invaluable! Guinea Pigs Unite! A Team Approach….

14. End of Year Celebration!!