1 / 6

Phobos Collaboration and Management

Wit Busza Phobos Technical Cost and Schedule Review November 1998. Phobos Collaboration and Management. PHOBOS. spectrometer. Two Detectors in one. * High rate, almost 4 p detector measuring charged particle multiplicity and d N/d h d f * High quality multiparticle

jstrother
Download Presentation

Phobos Collaboration and Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wit BuszaPhobos Technical Cost and Schedule ReviewNovember 1998 Phobos Collaboration and Management

  2. PHOBOS spectrometer Two Detectors in one * High rate, almost 4p detector measuring charged particle multiplicity and d N/dhdf * High quality multiparticle spectrometer, covering 1% of solid angle near y=0 with low Pt threshold and good particle identification 2 time of flight multiplicity detectors magnet

  3. Phobos Collaboration ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY Birger Back, Alan Wuosmaa BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY Mark Baker, Donald Barton, Alan Carroll, Stephen Gushue, Louis Remsberg, Andrei Sukhanov CASE-WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYCyrus Taylor INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, KRAKOWWojciech Bogucki , Andrzej Budzanowski, Tomir Coghen, Kazimierz Galuszka, Jan Godlewski ,Roman Holynski, Jerzy Kotula, Marian Lemler, Jerzy Michalowski, Andrzej Olszewski, Pawel Sawicki Marek Stodulski, Adam Trzupek, Barbara Wosiek, Krzysztof Wozniak, Pawel Zychowski JAGELLONIAN UNIVERSITY, KRAKOWAndrzej Bialas, Wieslaw Czyz, Kacper Zalewski MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYWit Busza*, Patrick Decowski, Kristjan Gulbrandsen, P. Haridas, Piotr Kulinich, Heinz Pernegger, Miro Plesko, Gunther Roland†, Leslie Rosenberg, Pradeep Sarin, Stephen Steadman, George Stephans, Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen, Carla Vale, Robin Verdier, Bernard Wadsworth, Bolek Wyslouch‡ NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, TAIWANYuan-Hann Chang, Augustine Chen, Willis Lin UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERAdam Hayes, Erik Johnson, Steven Manly, Robert Pak, Inkyu Park, Frank Wolfs UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGORussell Betts, Clive Halliwell, Burt Holzman, Judith Katzy, Wojtek Kucewicz, Don McLeod, Rachid Nouicer, Michael Reuter UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDEdmundo Garcia-Solis, Peter Stanskas, Alice Mignerey *Spokesperson†At Goethe University, Frankfurt‡Project Manager

  4. Phobos Management Structure

  5. Institutional Responsibilities

  6. PHOBOS PROJECT IS IN GOOD SHAPE we did follow your recommendations to consider changing the electronics and using one arm as contingency electronics and DAQ have been redesigned with only one arm, we have a contingency of 21% of uncommitted costs we plan to use any unspent contingency towards completion of 2nd arm PHOBOS WILL BE READY ON DAY-1 FOR PHYSICS everything will be in place except for a completed second arm DURING COMMISSIONING PERIOD WE PLAN to have in place the trigger counters, DAQ, parts of multiplicity and vertex detectors, and parts of the TOF to commission all aspects of PHOBOS, study backgrounds and triggering, and obtain a preliminary measurement of dN/d h

More Related