1 / 16

UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN. RENATE KLEIN & MARILYN FREEMAN LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY SRHE SEMINAR 8 MAY 2014. Case Examples. Student is exploited by relatives on whose financial support she depends

jsturges
Download Presentation

UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN RENATE KLEIN & MARILYN FREEMAN LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY SRHE SEMINAR 8 MAY 2014

  2. Case Examples • Student is exploited by relatives on whose financial support she depends • Student is physically abused by father of her child • Parents/family support student’s studies on condition that she get married to man of family’s choice when studies completed • Student has experienced abuse in childhood, and in multiple abusive relationships as adult • Student is physically abused in context of FM Freeman & Klein, 2012

  3. WHY should universities BOTHER? • Extent of problem • Disproportionate impact on female students • Legal duty to end discrimination • Improve access & participation

  4. prevalence National Union of Students, 2010

  5. Prevalence Stenning et al., 2012

  6. Forced marriage unit CASE LOADS • 2012 1485 cases • 82% female, 18% male • 71% 16-25 years old • 2013 1302 cases • 82% female, 18% male • 73% 16-25 years old www.gov.uk/forced-marriage

  7. impacts Feltes et al., 2012

  8. DO universities know? Stenning et al., 2012

  9. Reasons for low formal reporting • Violation seen as “normal” • Fear not to be believed • Fear that authorities will ridicule or dismiss • Fear that authorities will take inappropriate action • Not wanting to upset friends/family • Unwilling to bring charges against family Klein, 2012

  10. Red flags in academia • Failing academically • Failing a paper or exam • Sudden change in habits, not attending classes anymore or attending too much • Absence from classes • Requesting leave from classes to go home for an “arranged” marriage • Family or relationship “problems” • Crisis point

  11. How do Universities respond? Research Methodology: Semi-structured interviews • 24 staff at 9 different PSE institutions • 6 staff at 6 different NGOs • 5 police officers from 5 different PDs Keyword searches on websites • 16 HE websites, 40 FE websites Freeman & Klein, 2013

  12. Key findings • Response is up to individual staff members • Most highly motivated, well-meaning • Some well informed, specialist VAW training • Many without specialist VAW training • No systematic, institutional response • Problematic assumptions • About disclosure • About “generic” interventions Freeman & Klein, 2013

  13. Problematic assumptions about Disclosure • No disclosure means no problem? • Student will say things in a way staff member expects? • Distinction between arranged and forced marriage is clear? • Somebody else at university is first port of call? Klein, 2012; Ullman, 2010

  14. Problematic assumptions about interventions • Talking to parents helps? • Generic counseling skills are sufficient? • One-stop complaint processes are helpful? • Non-specialist policies (e.g., anti-bullying) are sufficient?

  15. Comprehensive response • Core responsibility for cultural transformation at institution • Specialist institutional policy with adequate staff training • Awareness campaign: campus culture and resources • Statement and action against abuse-conducive contexts • Information about specialist resources • Opportunities for disclosure (being clear on confidentiality) • Supporting students’ informed decisions • Participation in multi-agency working • Periodical impact evaluation

  16. Presenter contact • renate.klein@londonmet.ac.uk

More Related