1 / 51

PSY 190: General Psychology Chapter 8: Cognition

PSY 190: General Psychology Chapter 8: Cognition. How important is attention?. 1987 Northwest Airlines jet from Detroit crashed moments after take-off 154 passengers and crew, 2 on ground, died. Attention. Close or careful observation or mental concentration

justina-day
Download Presentation

PSY 190: General Psychology Chapter 8: Cognition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PSY 190: General Psychology Chapter 8: Cognition

  2. How important is attention? • 1987 Northwest Airlines jet from Detroit crashed moments after take-off • 154 passengers and crew, 2 on ground, died

  3. Attention • Close or careful observation or mental concentration • A selective narrowing or focusing of consciousness

  4. Different Aspects of Attention • Selective Attention • Visual • Auditory

  5. Selective Attention • Focusing our awareness on only part of everything we are experiencing • Trying to attend to one task over another

  6. Selective Attention: Visual • The Stroop Test (1935) • Names of words cause a competing response • Flanker compatibility task • Task–irrelevant stimuli are extremely powerful

  7. Dalrymple-Alford & Budayr (1966): • First to encourage presentation & timing of stimuli individually. This method now dominates. Stroop effect GREEN BLUE

  8. interference facilitation GREEN BLUE

  9. Selective Attention • Neisser et al. (1979) • In this one minute video, there will be two basketball teams • You task is to count the passes of just one team

  10. Selective Attention Simons & Chabris (1999)

  11. Attention & Visual Perception Mack & Rock (2000) • Research on a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness suggests that unless we pay close attention, we can miss even the most conspicuous events

  12. Sights unseen? • Inattentional Blindness • Participants were asked to focus on a cross • They often failed to notice an unexpected object, even when it had appeared in the center of their field of vision  Mack & Rock (2000)

  13. Change Blindness • People fail to detect substantial features of photographs and real world experiences • They seem to lack a precise visual representation of their world from one view to the next Daniel Simons Levin & Simons study (1997)  Levin & Simons study (1998) 

  14. Choice Blindness Johansson, Hall, Sikstrom, & Olsson (2005) • Participants failure to detect a mismatch from their original choice to what was later presented to them as their original choice (but was not) Petter Johansson 

  15. Selective Attention (Auditory) • Dichotic listening task (Cherry, 1953) • Any task where two streams of auditory information are presented simultaneously, one to each ear (generally over headphones). Subjects are required to attend to one ear only. • Shadowing task -- Two messages played, one to each ear. One message has to be "shadowed" by the subject (repeated back out loud). This is called the “attended” message.

  16. In Shadowing Task… • Listeners seldom noticed the unattended message being in a foreign language or in reversed speech • However, they nearly always noticed physical changes in the unattended message • Cherry’s conclusion?  • People can shadow accurately but its not easy  • Unattended auditory information receives very little processing

  17. Categorization • Categorization • Process by which things are placed into groups • Concept • Mental groupings of similar objects, events, ideas, and people Knowing about something is in a category gives us a great deal of information about it.

  18. Knowledge Can Affect Categorization • Knowledge of the world informs and shapes our predictions about concepts • Features in a complex network of explanatory links indicate • Relative importance of features • Relations among features • Objects classified into concept that best explains the pattern of attributes

  19. Do we categorize males as being more angry? Becker et al. (2007) Used gender-neutral faces in attempts to determine this Categorization Heuristics

  20. Categorization can lead to errors in stereotyping…

  21. Here’s another error…

  22. Problem Solving • Mental processes that occur when people work toward determining the solution to a problem • Kahneman (2011) • Two systems appear to be involved • System 1 – used for automatic processing • System 2 – used for effortful processing

  23. Availability Heuristics • We use our memory of actual instances for our judgment. So, when we make a judgment, things that are available in our mind determine our judgment. • Example • Think of words that begin with r. • Think of words that have r in the third position? • Which is easier to think of?

  24. What’s going on? • The availability heuristic: We base our judgments of the frequency of events on what comes to mind • There are three times as many words with r in the third position (car, park, barren, march)

  25. The Availability Heuristic • Which cause of death is more likely? • Homicide or Appendicitis • Auto-train collision or Drowning • Measles or Smallpox • Botulism or Asthma • Asthma or Tornado • Appendicitis or Pregnancy Lichtenstein et al. (1978)

  26. Availability: Illusory Correlations • Actual correlations: It’s cloudy and there’s a smell in the air, so it will probably rain • Illusory correlations: We think things are correlated, but they are not • One group and their stereotype

  27. The Representativeness Heuristic • Making judgments based on outward appearances only even though the base rate is low • One person represents the larger group • Extrapolate behavior of one person to everyone else

  28. The Representativeness Heuristic • Tversky & Kahneman (1974) • These researchers presented this example: • We randomly pick one male from the population of the US. He wears glasses, speaks quietly, and reads a lot. Is it more likely that this male is a librarian or a construction worker? Daniel Kahneman Amos Tversky

  29. The feminist bank teller • Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with the issues of discrimination and social justice. Which of the following is more probable? • Linda is a bank teller. • Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement. Tversky & Kahneman (1983)

  30. The problem of small samples • A certain town has two hospitals. The large hospital has ~45 babies born a day, and the small hospital has ~15 births a day. About 50% of all babies are boys. However, the exact percentage varies by day. For a period of 1 year, each hospital recorded the days on which more than 60% of babies born were boys. Which hospital recorded more of these days? Tversky & Kahneman (1974)

  31. The Confirmation Bias • We have a tendency to selectively look for information that conforms to our hypothesis and to overlook information that argues against it.

  32. Framing Effect • The way a question is worded can influence how people answer a question • How choices are stated seems to matter • When a problem is framed in terms of gain, we tend to choose sure things (risk-aversion strategy). • When a problem is framed in terms of loss, we tend to choose risky things (risk-taking strategy)

  33. Framing Effect • Example: • If you are lucky, you have a chance to win $1000. Which game do you choose? • Game A. a sure gain of $240 • Game B. 25% chance to gain $1000 and 75% chance to gain nothing • Game A  84% • Game B  16%

  34. Framing Effect • Example: • You are given $1000, provided that you will play either one of the following games. Which game do you choose? • Game C. a sure loss of $750 • Game D. 75% chance to lose $1000 and 25% chance to lose nothing. • Game C.  13% • Game D.  87%

  35. Framing Effect • Sunk Cost Effect • The willingness to do something because of money or effort already spent • This is a special case of the framing effect

  36. What Is Expert Cognition? • What makes someone an expert at anything?

  37. What Is Expert Cognition? • Reber (1967) • Implicit learning • Learning that appears to occur without awareness or intention to learn and often cannot be described in words what has been learned • “Cognitive unconscious”

  38. Implicit Learning: Learning that lacks perception? • Reber (1980) • Too many variables involved – too much to remember • In explicit learning, we consciously select only the key variables • In implicit learning, we are unselective and pay attention to allvariables • Few attentional resources are needed

  39. Implicit Learning: Expert Knowledge? • McGeorge & Burton (1990) • Implicit learning allows us to skip steps • Everything becomes automatic • We become experts

  40. Implicit Learning: Expert Knowledge? • Examples: • Chess players • Football QB’s • Riding a bike

  41. Practice Makes (Nearly) Perfect • Practice is crucial • Motivation is crucial • Expertise can sometimes overcome effects of age, but response time slower

  42. Expert Pattern Recognition • Chase & Simon (1973) • Chess master vs. beginners • Memorize chess pieces positioned for a real chess game for 5 seconds • Reproduce the arrangement shortly after

  43. Expert Pattern Recognition • Procedure • Participants were given five seconds to memorize board • They were then asked to draw an empty chess board and reproduce the arrangement of pieces Chase & Simon (1973)

  44. Actual Game Random Game Chase & Simon (1973)

  45. Chase & Simon (1973) (a) The chess master is better at reproducing actual game positions (b) Master’s performance drops to level of beginner when pieces are arranged randomly

  46. Chunking Helps • Chase & Simon (1973) • Implication: Chess master did not have a superior STM (as some had suggested); rather he had stored many of the patterns that occur in real chess games in LTM • He saw the layout of chess pieces not in terms of individual pieces but in terms of 4-6 chunks, each made up of a group of pieces that formed familiar, meaningful patterns • The chess master’s advantage vanished when the board was arranged randomly – familiar patterns were destroyed

More Related