1 / 31

Ground-based Measurements Part II

Ground-based Measurements Part II. Measurements Retrieving the Desired Information Comparison Between Instruments Satellite Validation Toward Model-Measurement Comparison. Prepared by: Dr. Stella M L Melo University of Toronto. AIRGLOW. What it is?

jverrill
Download Presentation

Ground-based Measurements Part II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ground-based MeasurementsPart II Measurements Retrieving the Desired Information Comparison Between Instruments Satellite Validation Toward Model-Measurement Comparison Prepared by: Dr. Stella M L Melo University of Toronto

  2. AIRGLOW • What it is? • Proxy for MLT temperature, concentration and dynamics • How we measure? • Comparing T measurements using airglow with LIDAR T measurements.

  3. AIRGLOW • What is it? • - “Spontaneous luminescence that rises from discrete transitions of the constituents of the atmosphere” (A. García-Muñoz, in preparation); • Has been used as proxy for atmospheric temperature, constituents and dynamics since back to the end of the 1950’s. • Main source: atomic oxygen photodissociated at higher altitudes.

  4. AIRGLOW • O + O + M  O2*+ M  250–1270 nm bands emission • O2* + O  O(1S) + O2 557.7 nm emission • Not including ionosphere… • N + O  NO*  180–280 nm emission • H + O3 OH*(v = 6-9) + O2 500–3000 nm bands emission (excess of energy 3.3 eV)

  5. O2 O2 O2(b-x) 0-1 band measured by Keck I/HIRES (50 min integration) Slanger and Copeland, 2003

  6. Airglow – Rocket measurements Rocket measurements – Alcantara (20S, 440W)

  7. OH Dyer et al., 1997

  8. Mars: Airglow Modeling – OH* By A. García Muños

  9. Mars: Airglow Modeling – OH* Diurnal variation By A. García Muños

  10. MLT Temperature from airglow • Atmospheric temperature is a basic parameter. • Mesopause (85-100 km) • Low temperature/low pressure • Transition from turbulent to molecular diffusion • Airglow can be used as proxy for MLT temperature • - OH vibrational bands • - well dispersed rotational lines • - extending from 400nm to 4mm • - intensity is relatively “easy” to measure Other planets!

  11. AIRGLOW rotational temperature • Precision improve: • - as the signal to noise ratio improves (DR/R decreases • as the difference in rotational energy of the states (Fb-Fa) increases • -> two lines that are farther apart in the spectrum will give a more precise measurement of the temperature Issues about LTE…

  12. Airglow imager Iwagami et al., JASTP, 2002

  13. MLT Temperature from airglow • Airglow (nadir) observations do not contain direct altitude information • At the end of the 80’s - narrow-band sodium lidar begun to be used to remotely measure the altitude profile of the atmospheric temperature between 85-105 km • Data-set show: • bimodal character of the mesopause altitude • the occurrence of the Temperature Inversion Layer above 85 km • Lidar do not normally provide information about the horizontal structures

  14. Lidar T profile • LIDAR – Light Detection and Range • Normally Lidar technique is used to measure Rayleigh scattering from which air density distribution is obtained. • By assuming hydrostatic and local thermodynamic equilibrium atmospheric temperature profiles can be calculated from the molecular backscatter profile. • Measurements are reliable form 30km up to 80 km altitude • Upper mesosphere: Na Lidar • Na fluorescence cross-section is 14 orders higher than the Rayleigh-scattering cross-section at 589 nm • Technique first proposed by Gibson et al., 1979 More on LIDAR? Carlo’s poster!

  15. Lidar T profile • – Energy levels NaD2 lines • - Doppler-broadened fluorescence spectra of NaD2 transition. She et al., Applied Optics, 1992

  16. Lidar T profile Melo et al., 2001

  17. Compare Lidar and OH* Temperature • First proposed by von Zahn et al. (1987) - determine OH* altitude • OH* layer at 86  4 km • differences in temperature sometimes of up to 10 K • influence of: • clouds • differences in field of view • fast motions of the OH* layer due to gravity waves • assumed OH* layer shape

  18. Lidar and OH* Temperature • She and Lowe (1998) compared temperature measured with lidar (Fort Collins) and from OH airglow (FTS): • Shape OH profile taken form WINDII measurements Generally, OH* rotational temperature can be used as a proxy of the atmospheric temperature at 87 ± 4 km

  19. Observations at Fort Collins (41N, 105W) November 2-3, 1997 Nocturnal average: Lidar ~ 30 K > OH* At 4.38 UT: Lidar 65 K > OH*

  20. Airglow Model • Photochemical model O3+H  OH+O2 (3.3 eV) O + O2 + M  O3 + M OH(n) + O  H + O2 OH(n) + O2 OH(n-1) + O2 OH(n) + N2 OH(n-1) + N2 OH(n) OH(n-n) + hn (Based on Makhlouf et al. 1995)

  21. Comparing Model and Observations

  22. OH* Rotational Temperature - Observations OH* response to a gravity wave based on Swenson and Gardner (1998) Lz~ 25 km

  23. Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density Profile from Airglow Measurements Reed and Chandra (1975) parameterization Upper mesosphere-lower thermosphere [O]z = [O]max * EXP (0.5{1.0 + (Zmax - Z) / SH - EXP((Zmax - Z) / SH)}) Melo et al, 2001

  24. 3 [O] [O] [M] 2 Nightglow emissions - 80-110 km OI 5577 Green line O(1S 1D) O2 Atmospheric bands O2(b1Sg+  X3Sg-) OH Meinel bands OH(X3Pn’  X3Pn” ) O+O+M O2*+M O2*+O O(1S ) + O2 O2*+O2 O2+O2 O(1S )+O2 O +O2 O + O + M O2*+M O2* + O2 O2(b1Sg+)+O2 O2* + O O2 + O2 O2(b1Sg+ )+M Prod. H + O3 OH* + O2 OH* + M Prod. O + O2 + M O3 + M 2 [O] [M] [O] [M] 2 IOH IO2 [O] [M] IOI

  25. Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density Profile from Airglow Measurements O-parameters recovered from the technique (solid line) compared to the input (dashed lines).

  26. Recovering Mesospheric Atomic Oxygen Density Profile from Airglow Measurements Atomic oxygen density profiles (atoms/cm3) input (a) compared to retrieved (b) and the percentage difference (c).

  27. TOH TO2

  28. Hydroxyl Profile Measured by WINDII (symbols) and calculated (line) (13-06-93)

  29. Airglow Imaging Systems for Gravity Wave Observations in the Martian Atmosphere • Stella M L Melo and K. Strong, University of Toronto • R. P. Lowe and P. S. Argall University of Western Ontario • A. Garcia Munoz, J. McConnell, I. C. McDade, York University • T. Slanger and D. Huestis, SRI International, California, USA • M. J. Taylor, Utah State University, USA • K. Gilbert, London, Canada • N. Rowlands, EMS Technologies Picture by Calvin J. Hamilton

  30. Mars Airglow REmote Sounding - MARES MARES-Ground is a zenith-sky imaging system for ground-based observation of wave activity in the Martian atmosphere through measurement of the contrast in images of selected airglow features. MARES-GWIM is a satellite-borne nadir-viewing imager which will produce static images of wave-induced radiance fluctuations in two vertically separated night airglow layers in the atmosphere. - GWIM has been developed for Earth’s atmosphere - MARES-GWIM will be an adaptation of GWIM for the Martian atmosphere.

More Related