1 / 39

Observations for Carbon Data Assimilation

Observations for Carbon Data Assimilation. Scott Doney Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Where does the “data” come from for “data assimilation”?. Atmospheric CO 2 data initial conditions innovation terms error covariance terms Land and ocean carbon data flux estimates for priors

kaemon
Download Presentation

Observations for Carbon Data Assimilation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Observations for Carbon Data Assimilation Scott Doney Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Where does the “data” come from for “data assimilation”? • Atmospheric CO2 data • initial conditions • innovation terms • error covariance terms • Land and ocean carbon data • flux estimates for priors • process/mechanistic information Data is NOT a black box!!

  2. Atmospheric Inverse Modeling of CO2 Concentration (observed samples) Sources & Sinks (solved for) Transport (modeled) + =

  3. How data enters the problem (1) Variational Assimilation Adjust model state “x” (atmospheric CO2 field) to minimize cost function J: Deviation of x from “background” Deviation of x from “observations” • So where do we get: • y0(t) data for innovation (model-data misfit) • R data error covariance • B model error covariance

  4. Some Issues to Ponder • Atmosphere CO2 drastically under-sampled • original design for marine background air • mostly discrete surface samples • NWP deg. freedom O(107); 6 hourly observations O(104-105) • CO2 weekly observations O(102-103) • Small signal on large background variability • surface North-south difference ~2.5 ppmv • zonal continent to land contrast <1 ppmv • measurement precision • accuracy in time & across stations and networks • reduce systematic biases!!

  5. Some Issues to Ponder • Representativeness of data y0 • “footprint” of observation • & mismatch with model grid • local heterogenity or point sources • aliasing of unresolved frequencies/wavenumbers (e.g., diurnal cycle) • data selection (i.e., exclude “unrepresentative” • observations)

  6. CCSM Climate Working Group Board of Trustees Reception National Science Board Breakfast ASP Reviews CO2 Concentration in the Outer Damon Room, NCAR Mesa Lab, 2/7 – 2/9/06

  7. Multiple Time/Space Scales

  8. In-situ Atmospheric Observing Network Discrete surface flasks (~weekly) Continuous surface (hourly) observatories Tall towers continuous (hourly) Aircraft profiles (~weekly)

  9. Surface Observatory

  10. Seasonal CO2: Continental vs Oceanic Sites • CO2 seasonal cycle attenuate, but still coherent, far away from source/sink region • Peak-trough amplitude of seasonal cycle ~ 30 ppmv (~10%)

  11. 10 ppmv Weather Cycles: CO2 is variable Modeled: one day in July [LSCOP, 2002] TURC/NDVI Biosphere; Takahashi Ocean ; EDGAR Fossil Fuel [U. Karstens and M. Heimann, 2001] On DT~5 days, Dx ~ 1000 km CO2 variability in the boundary layer ~ 10 ppmv (3 %)

  12. Diurnal CO2: Highly variable in boundary layer Calm night: stably stratified boundary layer Well-mixed PBL • Diurnal cycle of photosynthesis and respiration •  > 60 ppmv (20%) diurnal cycle near surface • Varying heights of the planetary boundary layer (varying mixing volumes)

  13. Vertical Profiles (free troposphere) 384 372 2006 2005 DATE

  14. Aircraft Campaigns COBRA 2000

  15. Surface Fluxes => Atmospheric CO2

  16. Orbiting Carbon Observatory(Planned Fall 2008 launch) • Estimated accuracy for single column ~1.6 ppmv • 1 x 1.5 km IFOV • 10 pixel wide swath • 105 minute polar orbit • 26º spacing in longitude between swaths • 16-day return time

  17. How data enters the problem (2) Separating transport, initial conditions & surface fluxes Analysis at time i => forecast at time i+1 transport fluxes 4D Variational methods: adjust initial conditions to better match future data initial conditions Deviation of x from “observations” Deviation of initial conditions from “prior” Deviation of fluxes from “prior”

  18. NEE = GPP – Reco NEE is measured at the tower GPP Photosynthesis (Daytime only) Ecosystem Respiration typically based on nighttime NEE & air temperature & ? Reco = Rhetero + Rauto CO2 CO2 CO2 Adapted from Gilmanov et al.

  19. Eddy-Flux Towers Vertical velocity (mean and anomaly) CO2 concentration (mean and anomaly) Vertical CO2 flux

  20. FluxNet Tower Sites

  21. Diurnal and Seasonal Cycle

  22. Time-scale character of carbon fluxes Variability is at a maximum on the strongly forced time scales They have an annual sum of ~0 Modeling the carbon storage time scales is much more difficult Diurnal Seasonal

  23. Tall-TowerFootprint 6 4 2 South-North Direction (km) 0 -2 -4 -6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 West-East Direction (km) Shrubland Barren Forested Wetland Lowland Shrub Wetland Mixed Dec/Con Mixed BL Deciduous Aspen Mixed Coniferous Pine Grassland Water Urban/Dev/Ag (Wang, 2005)

  24. Forest Inventory Analysis: Slow Process Observations • Plot-scale measurement of carbon storage, age structure, growth rates: 170,000 plots in US! • Allows assessment of decadal trends in carbon storage

  25. Air-Sea CO2 Flux Estimates Takahashi F = k s(pCO2air - pCO2water) = ksDpCO2 Kinetics transfer velocity Thermodynamics -undersampling & aliasing of surface water pCO2 -transfer velocity k empirically derived from wind speed relationships

  26. Gas Transfer Velocity

  27. Generating a Global Flux Map

  28. In-Situ Sensors and Autonomous Platforms Moorings/drifters (DpCO2, pH, DIC, NO3) Chavez et al. Profiling ARGO floats (also AUVs, caballed observatories) Riser et al.

  29. JGOFS/WOCE global survey (1980s and 1990s) -Global baseline (hydrography, transient tracers, nutrients, carbonate system) -Improved analytical techniques for inorganic carbon and alkalinity (±1-3 mmol/kg or 0.05 to 0.15%) -Certified Reference Materials -Data management, quality control, & public data access

  30. Ocean Inversion Method -Ocean is divided into n regions (n = 30, aggregated to 23) -Basis functions for ocean transport created by injecting dye tracer at surface in numerical models

  31. Simple Inversion Technique • Basis functions are model simulated footprints of unit emissions from a number of fixed regions • Estimate linear combination of basis functions that fits observations in a least squares sense. • Inversion is analogous to linear regression footprints fluxes obs Premultiply both sides by inverse of A estimated fluxes

More Related