1 / 29

Objectives

Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts “Leading Wisely, Living Well” The Seventh in a Series of Retreats April 29 - May 1, 2008 Stark II Phase III Regulations. Objectives. Review basic framework of the statute Discuss the most significant changes in the Phase III regulations

kaethe
Download Presentation

Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Association of WashingtonPublic Hospital Districts“Leading Wisely, Living Well”The Seventh in a Series of RetreatsApril 29 - May 1, 2008Stark II Phase III Regulations

  2. Objectives • Review basic framework of the statute • Discuss the most significant changes in the Phase III regulations • Identify action items

  3. The Stark Prohibition • If a physician (or a physician’s family member) has a financial relationship with an entity, the physician may not refer Medicare patients to the entity for designated health services unless an exception applies • Stark also prohibits an entity from billing for services provided as a result of a prohibited referral

  4. Penalties • Payment denial/recovery by Medicare • Refund to the individual • Civil monetary penalties of up to $15,000 per prohibited service/billing • Civil monetary penalties of up to $100,000 for a circumvention scheme • Program exclusion

  5. Analytical Approach • Is there a financial relationship between the referring physician and hospital? If yes, • Does the physician refer Medicare patients to the hospital for DHS? If yes, • Does the arrangement comply with an exception? If no, any bill submitted for a DHS resulting from a prohibited referral violates the statute.

  6. MD MD Hospital MD Physician Org/ Group Practice Physicians “Stand in the Shoes” of PC OLD Rule

  7. MDs Hospital LeasingCompany Arrangements With Non-Professional Entities Are Still OK

  8. MD MD Hospital MD Hospital Subsidiary Nonprofit Arrangements With Professional Entities Must Be Reevaluated

  9. Delay and Changes to SITS CMS delayed the effective date of SITS for certain arrangements of AMCs and exempt, integrated health systems 2009 IPPS Proposed Rule: • SITS wouldn’t apply if certain compensation arrangement exceptions are met • SITS would apply only to physicians who own the physician organization • New exception for “mission payments”

  10. Physician Recruitment • Exclusive exception • Only available for “qualified recruits” • Distinction between direct and indirect recruitment • Greater flexibility for rural providers

  11. Who Qualifies for Recruitment? Recruit must • not be on the medical staff; • relocate his/her medical practice; • into the hospital’s “geographic service area”

  12. Rural Hospitals Have a Larger Service Area Zip CodesIP %Total99210 22% 99211 20% 42%99212 18% 60%99218 16% 76%99225 8% 84% 99301 7% 91%99302 2% 93%99310 2% 95%99314 2% 97% urban rural

  13. Physician Recruitment, continued Direct recruitment requirements: • Written and signed agreement • Not conditioned on referrals • Remuneration not tied to referrals or other business • Recruit can establish privileges and refer elsewhere

  14. Indirect Recruiting • Except for actual recruiting costs incurred by the physician/group, the remuneration passes directly to the recruit • In an income guarantee, costs allocated to the recruit cannot exceed the actual additional incremental costs attributable to the recruit

  15. Actual Additional Incremental Costs What qualifies? • Recruit’s salary and benefits • Recruit’s malpractice premium and license dues • Cost of space rental? Maybe. • Cost of staff salary and benefits? Maybe. • General overhead? Probably not.

  16. Indirect Recruiting, continued • The physician/practice cannot impose unreasonable practice restrictions on a recruit • Records of actual costs and amounts paid to a recruit must be maintained for five years and be made available to CMS

  17. Retention Exception is Expanded • Available to hospitals, FQHCs and RHCs • Practice located in rural area, HPSA or underserved area • Bona fide offer requiring relocation outside of the hospital’s service area • Written offer from other hospital or physician organization for recruitment or employment • Certification from physician recruit

  18. Retention Payment Limits Vary Written Certification (the lower of…) • Amount equal to 25% of current annual income (calculated uniformly) • Reasonable cost to recruit a new physician to replace the physician Bona Fide Written Offer (the lower of…) • Amount = income physician would receive minus current income • Reasonable cost to recruit a new physician to replace the physician

  19. Disclosure of Financial Relationships • CMS proposes data collection about financial relationships • Description of all compensation arrangements with physicians such as: • employment • personal services • leases • recruitment • Report must be completed and returned within 60 days • CMP of $10,000 per day

  20. Copies Of Contracts Are Required Include a copy of the written agreement with the physician

  21. CEO or CFO Must Certify Signed by the CEO or CFO

  22. Non-Monetary Compensation Requires Record-Keeping • Hospitals must track the value of all benefits provided to physicians • New “cure” period • New holiday party exception

  23. Set In Advance Changes Again • Lease, personal services & FMV exceptions • Cannot amend the financial terms during the term • After first year, a new agreement is permissible • Limited holdover permitted

  24. Period of Disallowance • Begins when the relationship failed to comply with the statute • Ends when either • Arrangement brought into compliance • When excess/shortfall is paid

  25. Rural Referrals • Phase II created the exception for referrals from a physician to his/her family member or DHS entity with a financial relationship with that family member if: • patient lives in a rural area • no other person or entity to furnish the DHS within 25 miles of patient’s residence • Phase III alternative test of 45 minute transportation time • Warning to retain documentation such as weather report

  26. Limitation on Incident-To Billing • CMS defined “incident-to” services to exclude services and supplies that have their own benefit category under the Social Security Act • diagnostic x-ray • diagnostic lab test • Any credit to physician group practice members is prohibited

  27. Phase III Action Items • Monitor arrangements with physicians to ensure all aspects of exception are met • Gather certain minimum data set based on DFRR requirements • Track nonmonetary compensation

  28. Contact Information Lori NomuraTelephone: 206-447-7895Email: Nomul@Foster.com Foster Pepper PLLC1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400Seattle, WA 98101www.foster.com

  29. Association of WashingtonPublic Hospital Districts“Leading Wisely, Living Well”The Seventh in a Series of RetreatsApril 29 - May 1, 2008Stark II Phase III Regulations

More Related