1 / 39

Lecture 2: Basic Microeconomics I

Lecture 2: Basic Microeconomics I. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan Director. Given to the EMBA 8400 Class Classroom South #600 March 20, 2010. Chapter 3. Comparative Advantage & Trade. Positive vs. Normative Economics. Positive : Descriptive statement ( is, was) Refer to data

kaiya
Download Presentation

Lecture 2: Basic Microeconomics I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 2: Basic Microeconomics I Dr. Rajeev Dhawan Director Given to the EMBA 8400 Class Classroom South #600 March 20, 2010

  2. Chapter 3 Comparative Advantage & Trade

  3. Positive vs. Normative Economics • Positive : • Descriptive statement ( is, was) • Refer to data • Examples of positive statements: • GDP in the U.S. economy was about $7 trillion last year • The New York City rent control laws have created a shortage of housing in the city • Normative: • Value judgment (ought to be, shall, will) • Examples of normative statements: • Higher interest rates would be good for the U.S. economy in the next six months • The U.S. government should be required to balance its budget every year

  4. Production Possibilities Frontier • The classic tale of the farmer and the rancher…or a better example if you have one. • What should each produce? • Why should they trade?

  5. If there is no trade, the farmer chooses this production and 8 consumption. A 4 16 32 Production Possibilities Frontier (a) The Farmer ’ s Production Possibilities Frontier Meat (ounces) FARMER: 32 oz. of Potatoes in 8 hours 8 oz. of Meat in 8 hours 0 Potatoes (ounces)

  6. 24 If there is no trade, the rancher chooses this production and consumption. B 12 24 48 Production Possibilities Frontier (b) The Rancher ’ s Production Possibilities Frontier Meat (ounces) RANCHER: 48 oz. of Potatoes in 8 hours 24 oz. of Meat in 8 hour 0 Potatoes (ounces)

  7. Trade Example Without trade:

  8. Specialization & Trade “Farmer, my friend, have I got a deal for you! I know how to improve life for both of us. I think you should stop producing meat altogether and devote all your time to growing potatoes. According to my calculations, if you work 8 hours a day growing potatoes, you’ll produce 32 ounces of potatoes. If you give me 15 of those 32 ounces, I’ll give you 5 ounces of meat in return. In the end, you’ll get to eat 17 ounces of potatoes and 5 ounces of meat every week, instead of the 16 ounces of potatoes and 4 ounces of meat you now get. If you go along with my plan, you’ll have more of both foods.”

  9. Farmer's consumption with trade Farmer's 8 production & consumption A* without trade 5 4 A Farmer's production with trade 32 16 17 How Trade Increases Consumption (a) The Farmer ’ s Production and Consumption Meat (ounces) 0 Potatoes (ounces)

  10. Rancher's 24 production with trade Rancher's consumption 18 with trade 13 B* Rancher's production and B 12 consumption without trade 12 24 27 48 How Trade Increases Consumption (b) The Rancher ’ s Production and Consumption Meat (ounces) 0 Potatoes (ounces)

  11. Example Continued.. With trade:

  12. Trade According to Comparative Advantage (CA) or Opportunity Cost (OC) Absolute Advantage: Rancher beats the farmer in producing both meat and potatoes • CA is OC of two products – whatever must be given up to obtain a product • The producer who has the smaller OC of producing a good has a CA in producing that good • Rancher has CA in producing meat • Farmer has CA in producing potatoes

  13. Let’s Calculate OC(Meat in terms of Potatoes)

  14. Benefits of Trade • Whenever potential trading parties have differences in opportunity costs, they can each benefit from trade. • Trade can benefit everyone in a society because it allows people to specialize in activities in which they have a comparative advantage.

  15. Better Answer to Tough Questions (p.6)by David Wessel “What do you say to someone…who has lost his job to someone overseas who’s being paid a fraction of what that job paid here?” • Those of us who benefit from low-cost imports – or who have well-paid export jobs that wouldn’t exist if we don’t allow imports and outsourcing – must not ask those who lose jobs to go it alone. • If trade and technology make us richer, then we can afford to help pay for health insurance and protect pensions forced to bear the cost.

  16. Better Answer to Tough Questions (p.6)by David Wessel • That means pushing China and others to stop bending trade rules or manipulating currencies and pressing Europe and Japan to get their people spending so the U.S. Isn’t always the consumer of last resort. It means setting U.S. taxes so they cover government spending at least in good times, rewriting perverse tax laws that encourage companies to invest elsewhere and managing the unquenchable American thirst for health care without giving employers new excuses. • Discuss: wage insurance and role of education

  17. Economic Focus – Trade Disputes (p.7) • Suppose the poor country, spurred by technical progress, improves productivity in the rich country’s export goods: think of China’s advances in semiconductors or India’s in financial services/ Then, says the theory, trade can turn entirely to the poor country's advantage. The improvement in productivity in the poor country can reduce the price of the rich country’s exports by enough to make it worse off, despite the increased availability or cheaper goods. • Europeans worried about American growth in the 1950’s for this reason, and Americans later worried about Japan. • Move of textile manufacturing to the American South may have caused net losses in the North. OR that Malaysia’s leap in rubber production may have had the same effect on Brazil . Might the new wave of outsourcing to poor countries be different, and make rich countries poorer? • Forrester Research claims that 3.4 million jobs will be outsourced by 2015, but considering that the American economy destroys 30 million jobs EACH YEAR and then creates slightly more, this dwarfs the effect of outsourcing.

  18. Review of Last Week • 10 Principles of Economics • Sunk/Fixed costs • Opportunity Cost and Comparative Advantage • Benefits of Trade • Trade Debate

  19. Article 2: Too Many Cars • Overcapacity is the biggest problem for any automobile company in the world • GM buys Daewoo Motor, Fiat Auto, Saab • Ford motor owns Mazda, Land Rover • Daimler Chrysler is riding to rescue Mitsubishi • Oldsmobile and Chrysler’s Plymouth, are the first major automobile companies in 40 years • Why do ailing automobile companies who decry overcapacity keep ailing car companies? • National pride plays a big role • More brands mean more dealerships mean more sales. • But this also means more costs and complexity in business operations. In reality, overcapacity is not really a problem. One man’s overcapacity is other’s bargain. Thus, lower priced leases and generous rebates abound in today’s car market.

  20. Who REALLY Owns that Winery (p.8)by Terry McCarthy Consolidation is the Norm • 60% of U.S. wine is produced by the top five companies • Consolidation among distributors is squeezing out the medium-sized producers, who make from 100,000 to 1 million cases a year • Market is not growing • Only 10% of adults drink 86% of the wine • Fixed Costs • Some wineries do not have enough volume to get a priority from distributors

  21. Chapter 5 Elasticity

  22. Elasticity & Its Application • Evaluating questions like- • Banana Republic store manager/headquarters needs to decide on sale on jeans vs. sale on shirts • Rain destroys strawberry crop, prices go . Does it benefit growers ? • Why don’t you ever see sale or discounts on pure milk but see it on orange juice ? • These can be answered with the concept of elasticity (or responsiveness of buyers & sellers to changes in market conditions)

  23. Elasticity • Price elasticity of demand: a measure of how much the quantity demanded of a good responds to a change in the price of that good

  24. Continued.. • Two types of demand: • Elastic – responds a lot e.g. luxury cars ( luxuries) • Inelastic – not much change e.g. milk, certain food items, gasoline ( necessities) • Preferences: Luxuries vs. Necessities • Availability of close substitutes: Elastic • Butter & margarine; cars, booze • Time horizon: • Gasoline – necessity in short run • Substitute long run (electric cars, walk, bike)

  25. Elasticity • Inelastic Demand • Quantity demanded does not respond strongly to price changes. • Price elasticity of demand is < one. • Elastic Demand • Quantity demanded responds strongly to changes in price. • Price elasticity of demand is > one.

  26. Demand Curves • Question: Can I tell from the graphical shape of the demand curve what kind of elasticity the curve has? • Answer: Yes, but not all the time.

  27. Demand $5 4 1. An increase in price . . . 100 2. . . . leaves the quantity demanded unchanged. Perfectly Inelastic Demand Elasticity = 0 Price Quantity 0 3. . . . revenue goes from $4 x 100 to $5 x 100

  28. $5 4 1. A 22% Demand increase in price . . . 90 100 2. . . . leads to an 11% decrease in quantity demanded. Inelastic Demand Elasticity < 1 Price Quantity 0 3. . . . revenue goes from $4 x 100 to $5 x 90

  29. $5 4 Demand 1. A 22% increase in price . . . 80 100 2. . . . leads to a 22% decrease in quantity demanded. Unit Elastic Demand Elasticity = 1 Price Quantity 0 3. . . . revenue goes from $4 x 100 to $5 x 80

  30. $5 Demand 4 1. A 22% increase in price . . . 50 100 2. . . . leads to a 67% decrease in quantity demanded. Elastic Demand Elasticity > 1 Price Quantity 0 3. . . . revenue goes from $4 x 100 to $5 x 50

  31. 1. At any price above $4, quantity demanded is zero. $4 Demand 2. At exactly $4, consumers will buy any quantity. 3. At a price below $4, quantity demanded is infinite. Perfectly Elastic Demand Elasticity = Infinity Price Quantity 0

  32. Relationship Between Total Revenue (Sales) & Elasticity • Total Revenue = Price x Qty Sold = P x Qty • If demand is elastic, then a price decrease increases revenue • If demand is inelastic, then a price increase increases revenue • Example  class to contribute

  33. Box Shows the 50% Drop of New Paying Customers for the May & August 2004 Conference Caused by the Latest Price Hike 1st Price Hike 2nd Price Hike

  34. Applications of Supply, Demand & Elasticity • Can good news for farmers be bad news for farmers? • Wheat is inelastic: Bumper crop  bad news

  35. 1. When demand is inelastic, an increase in supply . . . 2. . . . leads to a large fall S1 S2 in price . . . $3 2 Demand 100 110 3. . . . and a proportionately smaller increase in quantity sold. As a result, revenue falls from $300 to $220. Increase In Supply In Market For Wheat Price of Wheat Quantity of 0 Wheat

  36. Better Answer to Tough QuestionsWSJ; by David Wessel “What do you say to someone…who has lost his job to someone overseas who’s being paid a fraction of what that job paid here?” • Those of us who benefit from low-cost imports – or who have well-paid export jobs that wouldn’t exist if we don’t allow imports and outsourcing – must not ask those who lose jobs to go it alone. • If trade and technology make us richer, then we can afford to help pay for health insurance and protect pensions forced to bear the cost.

  37. Better Answer to Tough Questions WSJ; by David Wessel • That means pushing China and others to stop bending trade rules or manipulating currencies and pressing Europe and Japan to get their people spending so the U.S. Isn’t always the consumer of last resort. It means setting U.S. taxes so they cover government spending at least in good times, rewriting perverse tax laws that encourage companies to invest elsewhere and managing the unquenchable American thirst for health care without giving employers new excuses. • Discuss: wage insurance and role of education

  38. Article 2: Federal Policies, Industry Shifts Produced Natural-Gas Crunch • Market and Federal Govt. have given energy customers enough incentives to use natural gas. But, Oil and Gas Industry has got little encouragement to produce more. • Fed’s efforts to promote clean air and US energy independence meant surge in demand of Natural Gas. • Increase in oil prices has curtailed oil and gas exploration. Thus, there has been an increase in imports of natural gas, mainly from Canada. Net result is prices go from $2.17 to $8 per million BTUs • Nation’s record long economic expansion – accompanying surge in energy consumption • Cold winter weather over much of US (2001)

  39. Cont. Article 2: Federal Policies…. • Federal govt. ordered the pipeline companies to become “open access” carriers. The move lowered the prices, which was a boon to the customers but a nightmare for the producers • Marketers emerged as a new breed of middlemen that took more profits without boosting gas production. As a result of narrow margins, some producers were forced to close and others to consolidate. • Seasonal Relief • Crackdown on Coal • Bankers Balk • Drilling for natural gas exploration, prohibited by federal agencies. • Alaskan producers pushing for a pipeline to continental US, but it will take another decade for that to materialize.

More Related