1 / 8

Funded under the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme Contract Number: 244031

Climate change integrated assessment methodology for cross-sectoral adaptation and vulnerability in Europe. Testing policy robustness using the Integrated Assessment Platform. For further information contact Jill Jäger (email: jill.jaeger@seri.at)

kalare
Download Presentation

Funded under the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme Contract Number: 244031

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Climate change integrated assessment methodology for cross-sectoral adaptation and vulnerability in Europe Testing policy robustness using the Integrated Assessment Platform For further information contact Jill Jäger(email: jill.jaeger@seri.at) or visit the project website (www.climsave.eu) Funded under the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme Contract Number: 244031

  2. Aim and definition • Examine whether adaptation responses are robust: → Benefits across sectors, scenarios and spatial scales; → Improvement in human well-being through a reduction of vulnerability to climate and socio-economic change. • Sectors: food provision, water exploitation, flooding, biodiversity, land use intensity and land use diversity. • Four climate scenarios and eight socio-economic scenarios. • Robustness across scale: comparing the results for Europe with those for Scotland.

  3. Testing method • Group adaptation options according to policy archetypes. • Set slider for each measure to the maximum amount that is credible for each socio-economic scenario. • Run the Integrated Assessment Platform for each scenario: • without any adaptation; and • with the adaptation options for each of the policy archetypes for 2050s timeslice. • Compare the total number of vulnerable people before and after adaptation. • Adaptation options that are not modelled in IA Platform were qualitatively assessed through expert judgement.

  4. Policy archetypes • Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA): promotes the integrity and health of ecosystems and habitats so that nature retains capacity for adapting to changing complex pressures and conditions. • Market-based Adaptation (MbA): fund raising/market mobilisationfor adaptation activities; efficient allocation of funds to avoid climate change related damages; promotion of adaptation by various stakeholders; and sharing of financial risks.

  5. Policy archetypes • Technology-based Adaptation (TbA): technology such as irrigation, flood defences and advanced early warning systems. • People-based Adaptation (PbA): human and social capital, through education and awareness-raising, and building of networks to respond to climate change and changing institutions.

  6. Example results for Europe Number of vulnerable people (2050s):

  7. Example results for Scotland Number of vulnerable people (2050s):

  8. Reflection on results • Policy archetypes are a useful approach to testing the robustness of combinations of adaptation options using the Integrated Assessment Platform and expert judgment. • Scotland: People-based Adaptation seems more robust than Ecosystem-based, Market-based and Technology-based. • Europe: People-based and Ecosystem-based Adaptation are more robust than Market-based and Technology-based Adaptation. • The method could be further developed to assess the robustness of combinations of different elements of the policy archetypes.

More Related