1 / 15

Goals and objectives

Goals and objectives. Project(s): Service OAM MIB Purpose of the contribution : Status update of the Service OAM MIB project Abstract : The SOAM MIB project work began after the Los Angeles 2010 Q1 meeting. Much work has been done on the TC and FM MIBs.

kalin
Download Presentation

Goals and objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Goals and objectives Project(s):Service OAM MIB Purpose of the contribution: Status update of the Service OAM MIB project Abstract:The SOAM MIB project work began after the Los Angeles 2010 Q1 meeting. Much work has been done on the TC and FM MIBs. Motion:Yes, two motions: one for an approved draft and one to initiate a straw ballot

  2. SOAM MIB StatusMiami (was Prague) Q2 2010 Steve Mood Omnitron Sytems

  3. SOAM MIB Status - Participation • Conference call participation: THANKS! Steve Mood (Omnitron) Abel Tong (Omnitron) Andrew Chagnon (Broadcom) Andy Mayer (Telcordia) Bill Bjorkman (Verizon) Brian Hedstrom (CableLabs) Brian Rose (Cox) Bruno Giguere (EXFO) Carl Moberg (Tail-f) Charles Cathey (Comcast) Chris Cook (Transition) Dan Martin (IBM) David Ball (Cisco) Doug Baar (Omnitron) Eugene Nechamkin (Broadcom) Jack Pugaczewski (Qwest) Jimmy Hu (Ciena) John Lemon (Adtran) Jozef Soroka (Media Com) Lionel Florit (Cisco) Marco Mascitto (Canoga) Mark Sylor (Exfo) Matt Hartling (Broadcom) Mehmet Toy (Comcast) Mike Bencheck (Verizon) Roger Williams (Comcast) Scott Mansfield (Ericsson) Sharfuddin Syed (Infinera) Sri Gangula (Adva) Thomas Clack (Broadcom) Zhengping You (AFORE)

  4. SOAM MIB Status - Calls • 17 conference calls were held: • February • Project Kickoff, Review MEF 7.1 object models, discuss document outline • March • Review TC and FM MIB comments submitted, discuss and review SNMP Notifications • April • Discuss open items, review new draft MIB document, review liaisons and status presentation for Prague • May • Discuss/incorporate additional review comments

  5. SOAM MIB Status • Work first focused on the goals of the project • Initial MIBs were submitted by Brian Hedstrom of CableLabs • The Textual Conventions MIB (ETH-SERVICE-OAM-TC-MIB) • The SOAM FM MIB (ETH-SERVICE-OAM-FM-MIB) • The SOAM PM MIB (ETH-SERVICE-OAM-PM-MIB)

  6. SOAM MIB Status • 11 Revisions of the TC MIB were made during the quarter • 16 Revisions of the FM MIB were made during the quarter • 4 Revisions of the PM MIB were made during the quarter • Initial text of the Service OAM MIB has been completed and submitted as contribution 33104_001

  7. SOAM MIB Status • Baseline documents used to create the MIBs: • IEEE 802.1ag CFM MIB • MEF 7.1 EMS-NMS Information Model) • MEF 17 (SOAM Requirements & Framework) • MEF 10.2 (Ethernet Service Attributes) • MEF SOAM-FM draft spec • MEF SOAM-PM draft spec • ITU-T Y.1731 (OAM functions and mechanisms) • ITU-T Q.840.1 (NMS-EMS management interface)

  8. SOAM MIB Status • The TC (Textual Convention) and FM (Fault Management) MIB modules were discussed and updated • The preliminary SOAM MIB document has been created and is ready to be reviewed. • There was not enough time to finish the PM (Performance Monitoring) MIB during the quarter and will be reviewed during next quarter • The stretch goal of reviewing the YANG model was not done during the quarter

  9. SOAM MIB Status • Open Items to work on during the next quarter: • Review the SOAM PM MIB • Review and resolve comments from the Straw Ballot (if the motion is passed) • Looking for feedback on SNMP Notifications • Review, update, and incorporate comments into the Service OAM MIB document • Need to coordinate with other ongoing work such as Availability work (MEF 10.2.1), Hybrid NID, etc. • Other work status will not slow down progress of this project • Review YANG Model

  10. SOAM MIB Document Structure • The SOAM MIB Project team proposes to split the MIBs into two separate documents • SOAM TC and FM MIB • SOAM PM MIB • This aligns well with the SOAM FM and PM IA documents being separate • TC and FM MIBs could Letter Ballot well before PM MIB thus providing Service Providers with FM MIB implementations much earlier • Is there any disagreement to this approach?

  11. SOAM MIB Status - Timeline • 1Q-Present 2010: Project Launch • Numerous calls were held and a draft FM document has been created • 2Q 2010: Move FM for SB • Conference calls between 2Q-3Q resolve all straw ballot comments • Review SOAM PM MIB • Produce SOAM PM MIB draft document • 3Q 2010: Move FM for LB; PM for SB • 4Q 2010: Move PM for LB

  12. Motion #1 (Assuming 2 MIB docs) • Approve contribution 33104_001 as Approved Draft 1 of the Service OAM FM MIB Technical Specification • Motion: • Second: • Voting: • Yes • No • Abstain

  13. Motion #2 (Assuming 2 MIB docs) • Initiate Straw Ballot on Approved Draft 1 of Service OAM FM MIB Technical Specification (based on 33104_001) • Motion: • Second: • Voting: • Yes • No • Abstain

  14. Motion #1 (Assuming 1 MIB doc) • Approve contribution 33104_001 as Approved Draft 1 of the Service OAM MIB Technical Specification • Motion: • Second: • Voting: • Yes • No • Abstain

  15. Motion #2 (Assuming 1 MIB doc) • Initiate Straw Ballot on Approved Draft 1 of Service OAM MIB Technical Specification (based on 33104_001) • Motion: • Second: • Voting: • Yes • No • Abstain

More Related