1 / 31

M. AUGUSTIN Institute for Timber Engineering and Wood Technology Graz University of Technology

Educational Materials for Designing and Testing of Timber Structures – TEMTIS Seminar. Horsens / Denmark, 11 th September 2008. CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER (CLT) AND THE AUSTRIAN PRACTICE. M. AUGUSTIN Institute for Timber Engineering and Wood Technology Graz University of Technology.

kamuzu
Download Presentation

M. AUGUSTIN Institute for Timber Engineering and Wood Technology Graz University of Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Educational Materials for Designing and Testing of Timber Structures – TEMTIS Seminar Horsens / Denmark, 11th September 2008 CROSS LAMINATED TIMBER (CLT)AND THE AUSTRIAN PRACTICE M. AUGUSTIN Institute for Timber Engineering and Wood Technology Graz University of Technology

  2. Cross Laminated Timber – Basic idea and Product Utilisation of side-boards Distribution of mechanical propertiesin the log 5-layered CLT-element

  3. CLT –Production volume Arguments PRO CLT: → Massive construction, less layers in theconstruction, buffer for heat and moisture → High degree of prefabrication possible → Easy assembling and short duration for erection → Flexibility of utilisation Arguments CONTRA CLT: → High price Production volume: 2008 About 400.000 m³ (+52 %) → To high amount for the market → Price will decrease (about 20 % in the next three years) Source: Timber Online / 2007

  4. “Austria-House” (2006) Turin / Italy CLT –Examples of erected buildings Building Research Centre Step 2 (2007) Graz / Austria

  5. CLT –Examples of erected buildings Multi-storey building (2001) Vienna / Austria “Wandritsch-Bridge” (1998) St. Lorenzen / Austria

  6. MODULE 1 • Mechanical AspectsStructural AnalysisVerification Procedure • MODULE 3 • GuidelinesBuilding PhysicsLeading Details • MODULE 2 • Connection Technique • MODULE 4 • Development of SystemsArchitectural PotentialCase Studies R&D-Activities concern. CLT – Institutefor Timber Engineering and Wood Technology /holz.bau forschungs gmbH // TUG • AREA 1_SSTC • Shell and Spatial Timber Constructions (SSTC) • TMC using CLT

  7. R&D-Activities concern. CLT – Institutefor Timber Engineering and Wood Technology /holz.bau forschungs gmbH // TUG Limit states Ultimate Limit State Serviceability Limit State Topic: Creep behaviour Topics: “System effects“ “Laminating effects“ Subproject “Creep“ Subproject “Load carrying capacity“(for elements loaded as plates and panels) Objective Load carrying model CLT Deformation factor CLT Further tests: Properties perpendicular to grain Vibration properties of CLT-floors

  8. CLTin standards Eurocode 1995-1-1 Currently no proposals for the verification of CLT-elements → The development of an European standard is initiated by the Austrian Standardisation Organisation (ON). DIN 1052-2004.08 A verification procedere is given in this standard Verification of stresses on each single layer: in accord. with EN 338D → This procedere leads to conservative results because no “homogenisation effects“ are considered !

  9. -35% æ ö 5 2 t 23 - × s ç ÷ × s s m 3 3 h è ø m 15 = @ £ m 1 × f f 0 , 65 f m , d m , d m , d Applied to layered products: e.g. Glulam

  10. Subproject“Load carrying capacity of CLT in bending“ Objective of the research work Method Results of tension tests: ft,0,l,05 = 12,5 N/mm² COVt = 39,4 %

  11. Mean value and COV of edge normal strength fm,c 45,00 18,0% 16,1% 39,4 39,0 40,00 16,0% 37,2 37,3 35,00 14,0% 14,4% 12,5% 30,00 12,0% 25,00 10,0% COV [%] fm,c,mean [N/mm²] 20,00 8,0% 5 # series ‚4u‘ fm,g,mean = 42,4 N/mm² COV = 9,5 % 7,6% 15,00 6,0% 10,00 19 # series ‚1u‘ fm,g,mean = 44,2 N/mm² COV = 20,1 % 4,0% 5,00 2,0% 0,00 0,0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 mean value Number of lamellas in the outer layers COV Testresults

  12. 5% fractile and ksys of edge normal strength fm,c 34,00 1,30 19 # series ‚1u‘ fm,g,05 = 29,0 N/mm² 33,00 32,6 1,25 32,00 31,3 1,20 31,00 1,19 29,8 30,00 1,14 ksys,CLT fm,c,05 [N/mm²] 1,15 29,00 28,00 1,10 1,1 1,09 27,3 27,00 1,05 26,00 1,00 25,00 1,00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5% fractile Number of lamellas in the outer layers system effect proposal ksys 5 % - quantile valuesand system factor for CLT

  13. including the variation of the base material Load carrying modelfor CLT loaded in bending Beam Model for GLT according to EN 1194:1999 e.g.:

  14. Load carrying modelfor CLT loaded in bending Beam Model for GLT including the variation of the base material

  15. Load carrying modelfor CLT loaded in bending Model for CLT

  16. Load carrying modelfor CLT loaded in bending Model for CLT

  17. ksys kCLT/GLT kh (h = 110 mm, b = 110 mm) a (COVt = 39,4 %) ft,0,l,05 1,1 0,94 1,20 3,15 29,6 26,9 28,6 23,8 12,5 31,3 27,3 29,0 - 12,5 Load carrying modelfor CLT loaded in bending Load carrying model for CLT in bending - based on test results Factor Analy. results Test results

  18. ft,0,l,05 COVt fm,c,05,=4 test results fm,c,05,≥4 calculated [N/mm²] [%] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] presented 12,5 39,4 % 31,3 28,1  New results 1) 26,8 (n = 50) 30,4 % 47,8 45,5  old results (1998) 19,3 (n = 80) ~ 35 % 39,1 2) 42,9 2) 39,4 3) 37,5  1) 5 layer CLT made of solid edge glued panels (spruce); 2) Single result of one 7 layer CLT element (width 2000 mm); 3) Single result of one 9 layer CLT element (width 2000 mm); Load carrying modelfor CLT loaded in bending Proposal of a Beam Model for CLT – Comparison with older data

  19. Verification intechnical approvals Specifications in technical approvals

  20. Comparison ofverification approvals Comparison of verification proposals DIN 1052 Proposal TUG

  21. Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded in bending Determination of stresses for CLT Normal stresses Shear stresses Ieff Seff

  22. isotrop spruce CLT 5-layered Determination of deformations ofCLT-elements loaded in bending Determination of deformationsfor CLT Ratio of shear-deformation on the total deflection (single-span beam with uniformly distributed load) 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% Area of utilisation in practice - plate beam Area of utilisation in practice - 25% Ratio wV / wges 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 10 15 20 25 30 35 Ieff Seff AG,eff k Ratio l / h

  23. Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded in bending Effective second moment of area of the cross section Number of layers 3 5 7 Ieff Seff AG,eff k

  24. Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded in bending Effective statical moment of the cross section Number of layers 3 5 7 Ieff Seff AG,eff k

  25. Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded in bending Effective area of the cross section Number of layers 3 5 7 Ieff Seff AG,eff k

  26. Shear correction factor κ f or CLT cross sections with consideration of the material values in accord. to DIN 1052 6 4,87 4,8 4,11 3,88 3,78 3,73 3,70 3,6 Shear correction factor κ 2,4 1,20 1,2 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 Number of layers n Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded in bending Shear correction factor Ieff Seff AG,eff k

  27. Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded in bending Shear correction factor with values from standards Ieff Seff AG,eff k

  28. 60 mm u a Determination of stresses inCLT-elements loaded as panel CLT wall elements under homogeneous shear (shear stiffness) experimental and theoretical solution (doctoral thesis in process: Th. Moosbrugger) - without openings u/a=0.067 ≈ 0.29 practical range board spacing:board width: u = 5 mma = 75 mm Gplate,mean= 229 N/mm² (5 tests, COV = 0.16) 0.8  u/a= 0.067 229 / 750  0.3 - with openings

  29. Creep behaviour ofCLT-elements Results Specimens with two cross sections:GLT and CLT Climate Stress - level GLT CLT Climate 2 Sl.2 - high + 38,5 % Sl.1 - low + 46,5 % Test setup: 4 – point – bending test according to EN 408 Climate 1 Sl.2 - high + 19,3 % Sl.1 - low +41,9 % Proposals for standardisation Futher details tests: Tests with two climates (55%/20°C; 78%/20°C) and two stress levels (about 3 N/mm² and 8 N/mm²) Approximatly values for Plywood

  30. Compression perpendicular to grainof CLT-cubic specimens Ec,90,mean = 500 N/mm² Stiffness fc,90,k = 3,0 N/mm² Strength Test setup: Tests on specimens with different number of layers, position of the board in the log, built-up factor and loading situations

  31. Contact DI Manfred AUGUSTIN Scientific Assistent +43 (0) 316 873-4604 manfred.augustin@lignum.tugraz.at Inffeldgasse 24, A-8010 Graz / Austria THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION !

More Related