120 likes | 130 Views
Correction. Meaning of Probability 3. Axioms of Probability Addition rule Multiplication rules Examples. Correction from end of last time: # of possible 2-card hands = choose(52,2) = 1326, not 221. P(A A) = 1/1326. P(AA) = Choose(4,2)/1326 = 1/221.
E N D
Correction. Meaning of Probability 3. Axioms of Probability Addition rule Multiplication rules Examples Correction from end of last time: # of possible 2-card hands = choose(52,2) = 1326, not 221. P(AA) = 1/1326. P(AA) = Choose(4,2)/1326 = 1/221.
Notation: “P(A) = 60%”. A is an event. Not “P(60%)”. Meaning of probability: Frequentist: If repeated independently under the same conditions millions and millions of times, A would happen 60% of the times. Bayesian: Subjective feeling about how likely something seems. P(A or B) means P(A or B or both ) Mutually exclusive: P(A and B) = 0. Independent: P(A given B) [written “P(A|B)”] = P(A). P(Ac) means P(not A).
Axioms (initial assumptions/rules) of probability: P(A) ≥ 0. P(A) + P(Ac) = 1. If A1, A2, A3, … are mutually exclusive, then P(A1 or A2 or A3 or … ) = P(A1) + P(A2) + P(A3) + … (#3 is sometimes called the addition rule) Probability <=> Area. Measure theory, Venn diagrams B A P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B).
A B C Fact: P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B). P(A or B or C) = P(A)+P(B)+P(C)-P(AB)-P(AC)-P(BC)+P(ABC). Fact: If A1, A2, …, An are equally likely & mutually exclusive, and if P(A1 or A2 or … or An) = 1, then P(Ak) = 1/n. [So, you can count: P(A1 or A2 or … or Ak) = k/n.] Ex. You have 76, and the board is KQ54. P(straight)? [52-2-4=46.] P(straight) = P(8 on river OR 3 on river) = P(8 on river) + P(3 on river) = 4/46 + 4/46.
Counting: k! = 1 x 2 x … x k. ( 0! = 1. ) (n choose k) = C(n,k) = (n) = n! . k k! (n-k)! Ex. You have 2 us, and there are exactly 2 us on the flop. Given this info, what is P(at least one more u on turn or river)? Answer: 52-5 = 47 cards left (9 us, 38 others). So n = C(47,2) = 1081 choices for next 2 cards. Each equally likely (and obviously mutually exclusive). Choices with a u : C(9,2) + 9 x 38 = 378. So answer is 378/1081 = 35.0%. ------------------------------------------------------ Answer #2: P(1 more u) = P(u on turn OR river) = P(u on turn) + P(u on river) - P(both) = 9/47 + 9/47 - C(9,2)/C(47,2) = 19.15% + 19.15% - 3.3% = 35.0%.
Ex. You have AK. Given this, what is P(at least one A or K comes on board of 5 cards)? Wrong Answer: P(A or K on 1st card) + P(A or K on 2nd card) + … = 6/50 x 5 = 60.0%. But these events are Not Mutually Exclusive!!! Right Answer: C(50,5) = 2,118,760 boards possible. How many have exactly one A or K? 6 x C(44,4) = 814,506 How many have exactly 2 aces or kings? C(6,2) x C(44,3) = 198,660 How many have exactly 3 aces or kings? C(6,3) x C(44,2) = 18,920 … … altogether, 1032752 boards have at least one A or K, So it’s 1032752 / 2118760 = 48.7%. Easier way: P(no A or K) = C(44,5)/C(50,5) = 1086008 / 2118760 = 51.3%, so answer = 100% - 51.3% = 48.7%
Example:Poker Royale: Comedians vs. Poker Pros, Fri 9/23/05. Linda Johnson $543,000 Kathy Kolberg $300,000 Phil Laak $475,000 Sue Murphy $155,000 Tammy Pescatelli $377,000 Mark Curry $0. No small blind. Johnson in big blind for $8000. Murphy (8h 8s). Calls $8,000. Kolberg. (9c 9d). Raises to $38,000. Pescatelli (Kh 3s) folds, Laak (9h 3h) folds, Johnson (Jh 6d) folds. Murphy calls. TV Screen: Kolberg. (9c 9d) 81% Murphy (8h 8s) 19% Flop: 8c Td Ts. Murphy quickly goes all in. Kolberg thinks for 2 min, then calls. Laak (to Murphy): “You’re 92% to take it down.” TV Screen: Kolberg. (9c 9d) 17% Murphy (8h 8s)83% Who’s right? (Turn 9s river Ad), so Murphy is eliminated. Laak went on to win.
TV Screen: Kolberg. (9c 9d) 81% Murphy (8h 8s) 19% Flop: 8c Td Ts. Murphy quickly goes all in. Kolberg thinks for 2 min, then calls. Laak (to Murphy): “You’re 92% to take it down.” TV Screen: Kolberg. (9c 9d)17% Murphy (8h 8s)83% Cardplayer.com: 16.8%83.2% Laak (about Kolberg): “She has two outs twice.” P(9 on the turn or river, given just their 2 hands and the flop)? = P(9 on turn) + P(9 on river) - P(9 on both) = 2/45 + 2/45 - 1/C(45,2) = 8.8%Given other players’ 6 cards? Laak had a 9, so it’s 1/39 + 1/39 = 5.1%
TV Screen: Kolberg. (9c 9d) 81% Murphy (8h 8s) 19% Flop: 8c Td Ts. Murphy quickly goes all in. Kolberg thinks for 2 min, then calls. Laak (to Murphy): “You’re 92% to take it down.” TV Screen: Kolberg. (9c 9d)17% Murphy (8h 8s)83% Cardplayer.com: 16.8%83.2% Given just their 2 hands and the flop, what is P(9 or T on the turn or river)? P(9 or T on the turn) + P(9 or T on river) - P(both) = 4/45 + 4/45 - C(4,2)/C(45,2) = 17.2%
P(A & B) is written “P(AB)”. “P(A U B)” means P(A or B). Conditional Probability: P(A given B) [written“P(A|B)”] = P(AB) / P(B). Independent: A and B are “independent” if P(A|B) = P(A). Fact (multiplication rule for independent events): If A and B are independent, then P(AB) = P(A) x P(B) Fact (general multiplication rule): P(AB) = P(A) P(B|A) P(ABC…) = P(A) x P(B|A) x P(C|A&B) …
Example: High Stakes Poker, 1/8/07: (Game Show Network, Mon/Thur nights): Greenstein folds, Todd Brunson folds, Harman folds. Elezra calls $600. Farha (K J) raises to $2600 Sheikhan folds. Negreanu calls, Elezra calls. Pot is $8,800. Flop: 6 T 8. Negreanu bets $5000. Elezra raises to $15000. Farha folds. Negreanu thinks for 2 minutes….. then goes all-in for another $96,000. Elezra: 8 6. (Elezra calls. Pot is $214,800.) Negreanu: A T. -------------------------------------------------------- At this point, the odds on tv show 73% for Elezra and 25% for Negreanu. They “run it twice”. First: 2 4. Second time? A 8! P(Negreanu hits an A or T on turn & still loses)?
Given both their hands, and the flop, and the first “run”, what is P(Negreanu hits an A or T on the turn & loses)? It’s P(A or T on turn) x P(Negreanu loses | A or T on the turn) = 5/43 x 4/42 = 1.11% (1 in 90) Note: this is very different from: P(A or T on turn) x P(Negreanu loses), which would be about 5/43 x 73% = 8.49% (1 in 12)