1 / 30

Diffractive deep inelastic scattering

Diffractive deep inelastic scattering. Cyrille Marquet RIKEN BNL Research Center. Contents. Inclusive deep inelastic scattering (DIS): e h  e X the structure functions F 2 , F T and F L Diffractive deep inelastic scattering Inclusive Diffraction: e h  e X h

kasi
Download Presentation

Diffractive deep inelastic scattering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Diffractive deep inelastic scattering Cyrille MarquetRIKEN BNL Research Center

  2. Contents • Inclusive deep inelastic scattering (DIS): e h  e Xthe structure functions F2, FT and FL Diffractive deep inelastic scattering • Inclusive Diffraction: e h  e X h the structure functions F2D, FTDand FLD • Exclusive vector meson production: e h  e  h, e h  e J/ hDeeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS): e h  e  h momentum transfer and impact parameter • Diffactive jet production

  3. lh center-of-mass energyS = (l+P)2*h center-of-mass energyW2 = (l-l’+P)2photon virtualityQ2 = - (l-l’)2 > 0 transverse size resolution 1/Q P hadron Deep inelastic scattering (DIS) x ~ momentum fraction of the struck parton y~ W²/S

  4. Deep inelastic scattering (DIS) FTand FL correspond to the scattering of a transversely (T) or longitudinally (L) polarized virtual photon off the hadron experimental data are often shown in terms of

  5. e p  e X experimental data measurements performed at the HERA collider by the H1 and ZEUS collaborations over a broad kinematic range at moderate x: bjorken scaling  F2(x) scaling violations: evidence for gluons about 15 % of the events are diffractive

  6. Geometric scaling in DIS When plotting the same cross-section as a function of the variable Q² x one obtains a scaling curve: Stasto, Golec-Biernat and Kwiecinski (2001) x < 10-2 with Q0 1 GeV and  0.3 this scaling is called geometric scaling it identifies an intrinsic scale of the proton which rises as x decreases: Q0x-/2 Can we understand that scale/scaling from QCD? It should also have consequences in diffraction

  7. Inclusive diffraction

  8. momentum transfert = (P-P’)2 < 0diffractive mass of the final stateMX2 = (P-P’+l-l’)2 P hadron P Diffractive DIS when the hadron remains intact ~ momentum fraction of the struck parton with respect to the Pomeron xpom = x/ rapidity gap :  = ln(1/xpom) xpom~ momentum fraction of the Pomeron with respect to the hadron

  9. experimental data are often shown in terms of Diffractive DIS in terms of photon-hadron diffractive cross-section:

  10. Diffractive DIS without proton tagging e p  e X Y with MY cut H1 LRG data MY < 1.6 GeV ZEUS FPC data MY < 2.3 GeV Inclusive diffraction measurements Diffractive DIS with proton tagging e p  e X p H1 FPS data ZEUS LPS data

  11. e p  e X p experimental data measurements performed at the HERA collider by the H1 and ZEUS collaborations over a broad kinematic range

  12. perturbative • perturbative evolution of  with Q2 : Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi Collinear factorization in the limit Q²   withx fixed • For inclusive DIS a = quarks, gluons not valid if x is too small non perturbative

  13. for instance at the Tevatron: predictions obtained with diffractive pdfs overestimate CDF data by a factor of about 10 a very popular approach: use collinear factorization anyway, and apply a correction factor called the rapidity gap survival probability Factorization in DDIS ? collinear factorization for F2Dsimilar with diffractive parton densities but: you cannot do much with the diffractive pdfs factorization does not hold for diffractive jet production at low Q² diffractive jet production in pp collisions factorization also holds for diffractive jet production at high Q²

  14. k’ k r : dipole size p in diffraction: at large Nc, 1 dipole emitting N-1 gluons = N dipoles The dipole picture of DIS valid in the small-x limit

  15. p p’ Elastic/inelastic components elas: involves the quark-antiquark final state, dominant for small diffractive mass (large  ) same object for inclusiveand diffractive cross-section dissoc: involves higher order final states: qqg, …dominant for large diffractive mass (small  ) can also be expressed in the dipole picture

  16. Measuring FLD Contributions of the different final states to the diffractive cross-section: at small  : quark-antiquark-gluon at intermediate  : quark-antiquark (T) at large  : quark-antiquark (L) large  measurements FLD FLD is higher twist: it cannot be predicted from pdfs

  17. x < 10-2  0.3 What about geometric scaling geometric scaling can be easily understood as a consequence of large parton densities what does the proton look like in (Q², x) plane: lines parallel to the saturation line are lines of constant densities along which scattering is constant

  18. Geometric scaling in diffraction At fixed  , the scaling variable should be C.M. and L. Schoeffel (2006)  0.3 consistent with the HERA data diffractive cross-section in bins of  xpom < 10-2

  19. MX=30 GeV MX=20 GeV MX=11 GeV MX=6 GeV MX=3 GeV MX=1.2 GeV Success of the dipole model CGC = saturation model Iancu, Itakura and Munier (2003) Forshaw and Shaw have not been able to find a good fit without saturation effects

  20. Ratio diffractive/inclusive saturation naturally explains the constant ratio

  21. Exclusive vector meson productionandDeeply virtual Compton scattering

  22. in the dipole picture: with the overlap function: sensitive to instead of  access to impact parameter Exclusive vector-meson production measurements: lots of data from HERA (especially J/Psi) - collinear factorization with generalized parton densities - determination of the t slope:

  23. rho production S. Munier, A. Stasto and A. Mueller (2001) the S-matrix (S=1-T ) is extracted from the  data yellow band: cannot be trusted, too sensitive to large t region where there is no data S(1/r 1Gev, b  0, x  5.10-4)  0.6 HERA is entering the saturation regime

  24. J-Psi production H. Kowalski and D. Teaney (2003) E. Gotsman, E. Levin, M. Lublinsky,U. Maor and E. Naftali (2003)

  25. What about geometric scaling t integrated cross-sections d/dt cross-sections C.M., R. Peschanski and G. Soyez (2005) saturation scale form factor with B = const need data at fixed t for different values of x and Q²

  26. Diffractive tri-jet production

  27. model independent model dependent model independent 1/k² k² k 0 k0 Diffractive tri-jet production C.M. and K. Golec-Biernat (2005) final state configuration: tri-jet + gap + proton k0: typical unitarization scale idea: measure the transverse momentum spectrum of the gluon jet k the gluon jet is the most forward in the proton direction other configurations are suppressed by ln(1/ ) k : gluon transverse momentum • observable strongly sensitive to unitarity effects

  28. kmax/QS = independent of Q², QS  1.5 Can we experimentally test this? extract QS? important limitation: at HERA QS< 1 Gev and k > 3 Gev one does not have access to the whole bump Study of with a saturation model marked bump for k = kmax

  29. In the HERA energy range Predictions of the GBW model with and the parameters  andx0 taken from the F2 fits: • = 0.288 andx0 = 3.10-4 for full lines (no charm)  = 0.277 andx0 = 4.10-5 for dashed lines (charm included) need points in different bins ZEUS did measure 4 points for

  30. Conclusions • Inclusive diffractionmeasure FLD • Exclusive vector meson production/DVCSmeasurements in different t bins with large Q² and x ranges • Diffractive tri-jet productionpotential to bring evidence for saturation?

More Related