1 / 32

What do we know about the Standard Model?

Explore the theoretical limits and constraints of the Standard Model, including unitarity, naturalness, and the behavior of the Higgs boson. Learn about the bounds on the Higgs mass and the question of spontaneous symmetry breaking.

Download Presentation

What do we know about the Standard Model?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute

  2. The Standard Model Works • Any discussion of the Standard Model has to start with its success • This is unlikely to be an accident

  3. Theoretical Limits on Higgs Sector • Unitarity • Really we mean perturbative unitarity • Violation of perturbative unitarity leads to consideration of strongly interacting models of EWSB such as technicolor, Higgless • Consistency of Standard Model • Triviality (What happens to couplings at high energy?) • Does spontaneous symmetry breaking actually happen? • Naturalness • Renormalization of Higgs mass is different than renormalization of fermion mass • One motivation for supersymmetric models

  4. Unitarity • Consider 2  2 elastic scattering • Partial wave decomposition of amplitude • al are the spin l partial waves s=center of mass energy-squared

  5. Unitarity • Pl(cos) are Legendre polynomials: Sum of positive definite terms

  6. More on Unitarity • Optical theorem • Unitarity requirement: Optical theorem derived assuming only conservation of probability Im(al) Re(al)

  7. More on Unitarity • Idea: Use unitarity to limit parameters of theory Cross sections which grow with energy always violate unitarity at some energy scale

  8. Example: W+W-W+W- Electroweak Equivalence theorem: A(WL+WL -→WL+WL-) =A(+ -→ +-)+O(MW2/s)  are Goldstone bosons which become the longitudinal components of massive W and Z gauge bosons

  9. W+W-W+W- • Consider Goldstone boson scattering: +-+ • Recall scalar potential

  10. +-+- • Two interesting limits: • s, t >> MH2 • s, t << MH2

  11. Use Unitarity to Bound Higgs • High energy limit: • Heavy Higgs limit MH < 800 GeV Ec 1.7 TeV  New physics at the TeV scale Can get more stringent bound from coupled channel analysis

  12. Consider W+W- pair production Example: W+W- • t-channel amplitude: • In center-of-mass frame: (p) W+(p+) k=p-p+=p--q e(k) (q) W-(p-)

  13. W+W- pair production, 2 • Interesting physics is in the longitudinal W sector: • Use Dirac Equation: pu(p)=0 Grows with energy

  14. W+W- pair production, 3 • SM has additional contribution from s-channel Z exchange • For longitudinal W’s (p) W+(p+) Z(k) (q) W-(p-) Contributions which grow with energy cancel between t- and s- channel diagrams Depends on special form of 3-gauge boson couplings

  15. No deviations from SM at LEP2 No evidence for Non-SM 3 gauge boson vertices Contribution which grows like me2s cancels between Higgs diagram and others LEP EWWG, hep-ex/0312023

  16. Limits on Scalar Potential • MH is a free parameter in the Standard Model • Can we derive limits on the basis of consistency? • Consider a scalar potential: • This is potential at electroweak scale • Parameters evolve with energy

  17. High Energy Behavior of  • Renormalization group scaling • Large  (Heavy Higgs): self coupling causes  to grow with scale • Small  (Light Higgs): coupling to top quark causes  to become negative

  18. Does Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Happen? • SM requires spontaneous symmetry • This requires • For small  • Solve

  19. Does Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Happen? • () >0 gives lower bound on MH • If Standard Model valid to 1016 GeV • For any given scale, , there is a theoretically consistent range for MH

  20. What happens for large ? • Consider HH→HH • (Q) blows up as Q (called Landau pole)

  21. Landau Pole • (Q) blows up as Q, independent of starting point • BUT…. Without H4 interactions, theory is non-interacting • Require quartic coupling be finite • Requirement for 1/(Q)>0 gives upper limit on Mh • Assume theory is valid to 1016 GeV • Gives upper limit of MH< 180 GeV

  22. Bounds on SM Higgs Boson • If SM valid up to Planck scale, only a small range of allowed Higgs Masses MH (GeV)  (GeV)

  23. Naturalness • We often say that the SM cannot be the entire story because of the quadratic divergences of the Higgs Boson mass • Renormalization of scalar and fermion masses are fundamentally different

  24. Masses at one-loop • First consider a fermion coupled to a massive complex Higgs scalar • Assume symmetry breaking as in SM:

  25. Masses at one-loop • Calculate mass renormalization for  To calculate with a cut-off, see my Trieste notes

  26. Symmetry and the fermion mass • MF  MF • MF=0, then quantum corrections vanish • When MF=0, Lagrangian is invariant under • LeiLL • ReiRR • MF0 increases the symmetry of the theory • Yukawa coupling (proportional to mass) breaks symmetry and so corrections  MF

  27. Scalars are very different • MH diverges quadratically! • This implies quadratic sensitivity to high mass scales

  28. Scalars • MH diverges quadratically • Requires large cancellations (hierarchy problem) • H does not obey decoupling theorem • Says that effects of heavy particles decouple as M • MH0 doesn’t increase symmetry of theory • Nothing protects Higgs mass from large corrections

  29. Light Scalars are Unnatural • Higgs mass grows with  • No additional symmetry for MH=0, no protection from large corrections H H MH 200 GeV requires large cancellations

  30. What’s the problem? • Compute Mh in dimensional regularization and absorb infinities into definition of MH • Perfectly valid approach • Except we know there is a high scale

  31. Try to cancel quadratic divergences by adding new particles • SUSY models add scalars with same quantum numbers as fermions, but different spin • Little Higgs models cancel quadratic divergences with new particles with same spin

  32. We expect something at the TeV scale • If it’s a SM Higgs then we have to think hard about what the quadratic divergences are telling us • SM Higgs mass is highly restricted by requirement of theoretical consistency • Expect that Tevatron or LHC will observe SM Higgs (or definitively exclude it)

More Related