1 / 15

Marieta Sakalian Regional Programme Coordinator Europe/CIS UNEP Division of GEF Coordination

UNEP-GEF Biodiversity Conservation Projects in Europe/ CIS Region Results, Lessons Learned and Key Challenges. Marieta Sakalian Regional Programme Coordinator Europe/CIS UNEP Division of GEF Coordination. Presentation Outline. ● Background of UNEP-GEF Biodiversity Portfolio in

kele
Download Presentation

Marieta Sakalian Regional Programme Coordinator Europe/CIS UNEP Division of GEF Coordination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNEP-GEF Biodiversity Conservation Projects in Europe/CIS Region Results, Lessons Learned and Key Challenges Marieta Sakalian Regional Programme Coordinator Europe/CIS UNEP Division of GEF Coordination

  2. Presentation Outline ● Background of UNEP-GEF Biodiversity Portfolio in the Europe/CIS Region; ● Results and Lessons Learned on: • Regional cooperation, key elements of success • Safeguarding biodiversity (Biosafety) • Protected Areas (PA) Management • Mainstreaming Biodiversity ● Challenges

  3. Background of UNEP-GEF Biodiversity Portfolio in the Europe/CIS Region ●Includes 15 ongoing and closed GEF3 and GEF4 projects in 17countries: - 10 on Biosafety - 2 on mainstreaming biodiversity into agriculture production sector - 3 on catalyzing the sustainability of protected areas ● Total US$ 30.81million GEF funding and US$ 35million in co-financing.

  4. Regional Cooperation: Key elements for success ● Work through National and International Executing Agencies and partners with networks at national and regional levels; ● Cooperation and shared objectives within the regions; ● Strong and sustainable partnerships at all levels; ●Strong local community engagement; ● Qualified and motivated project teams

  5. BIOSAFETY Results and Lessons Learned ●5 active projects supporting Implementation of National Biosafety Frameworks (NBFs) - Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania, Moldova and Slovakia; ●5 approved PIFs for Albania, FYR Macedonia, Tajikistan, Turkey and Turkmenistan; ● Armenia, Kyrgyz Republic, Romania have PIFs that they decided to postpone to GEF-5. Azerbaijan has expressed interest in biosafety in GEF-5

  6. BIOSAFETY Results and Lessons Learned ●The existence of EC Directives has been a strong "driver" of fully-compliant national systems; ●Sustainability of capacity building is fragile in the absence of applications and the need to use the regulatory framework; ●Polarisation of agbiotech private sector and NGO/public opinion places politicians in a difficult position; ●Although regional approaches make more scientific and technical sense, politically, this will be difficult to achieve.

  7. Protected Areas ManagementResults and Lessons Learned ●Siberian Crane Wetland Project: RussianFederation, Chına, Iran, Kazakhstan; ●Wings Over Wetlands (WOW):Armenia, Estonia, Azerbaijan, Georgia,Hungary, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Russian Federation,Turkmenistan,Turkey,Uzbekistan • New PA established - Zharsor-Urkash Nature Reserve (53,350 ha, Kazakhstan) and Synsko-Voykarskyi Natural Park (Kunovat, Russia); • PA Expanded in Size - Naurzum (Kazakhstan) from 30,000 to 191,381 ha, plus buffer zone of 116,726 ha and Kytalyk (Russia) from 1,607,000 to 2,598,590 ha; • PA and Water Management Plans developed; • Addressed threats - Removal of Oil Exploration Rig from Uvat breeding grounds in Russia

  8. Protected Areas ManagementResults and Lessons Learned ●Decentralization of PA management to local governments and communities and NGOs is essential to achieve sustainable conservation objectives; ● Emerging environmental problems such as climate change has to be taken into consideration in PA management; ● Financial sustainability should be a primary component of intervention strategies and exit strategies of projects; ● Management decisions should be based on Applied Research and Ecological Monitoring results

  9. Mainstreaming BiodiversityResults and Lessons Learned ●In-Situ/On Farm Conservation and Use of Agricultural Biodiversity (Horticultural Crops and Wild Fruit Species)in Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan ●In-situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives through Enhanced Information Management and Field Application:Armenia, Bolivia, Madagascar, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan • Demonstration activities cover 828,228 ha • Key sectors covered - agriculture (agricultural biodiversity) and forestry

  10. Mainstreaming BiodiversityResults and Lessons Learned ● Legal frameworks and benefit sharing mechanisms; ●Increased capacity - Regional Training Centers; ● Knowledge base and information management systems – National and International information systems on Crop Wild Relatives and Horticultural crops ● Reducing vulnerability - Increasing the potential of farmers to withstand economic and climate change

  11. Mainstreaming BiodiversityResults and Lessons Learned ● Replication and scaling up of project outputs depends on the political will to commit resources to research and implementation and to make the necessary political and institutional arrangements; ● In order to achieve global environmental benefits arising from a complex and challenging project it is essential to establish sustainable effective partnerships between relevant sectors – environment, agriculture and forestry, and to promote the sharing of experiences between countries;

  12. Mainstreaming BiodiversityResults and Lessons Learned ● Mainstreaming into decision-making depends on integration and institutionalization of project implementation and management through the relevant partner agencies at national and regional level; ● Frequent and clear communication with partners is critical for achievement of project objectives. ● Long-term cooperation and shared objectives within the regions are critical for multi-country projects;

  13. Some Current Challenges ● UNEP’s regional presence is limited while demand for services is high; ● GEF project cycle remains cumbersome despite good reforms; ● Co-finance burden for many partners and countries; ● Lack of incentives for inter-agency cooperation on projects;

  14. Some Current Challenges ● Incentives for regional cooperation & multi-country projects (mechanism of Set Aside funds as ‘top-up’ to STAR); ● Some misconception regional GEF projects – as being too costly or not having national benefits; ● Transaction costs for Executing Agencies not fully recovered through project management costs.

  15. Спасибо за внимание

More Related