1 / 14

Process Bus Implementation on IEDs: Development Considerations

Process Bus Implementation on IEDs: Development Considerations. Overview. Conventional / Process Bus Substations Topology example Development of the IED SV time alignment Sampling frequency change Frequency tracking Estimation of lost SV. Conventional Substation. Process Bus Substation.

kendallt
Download Presentation

Process Bus Implementation on IEDs: Development Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Process Bus Implementation on IEDs: Development Considerations

  2. Overview • Conventional / Process Bus Substations • Topology example • Development of the IED • SV time alignment • Sampling frequency change • Frequency tracking • Estimation of lost SV

  3. Conventional Substation

  4. Process Bus Substation

  5. Process Bus Substation

  6. WAN Network Topology Example Telecontrol. Protection Management Maintenance Management LEVEL 2 (Substation) Subestation Bus IEC 61850-8-1 LEVEL 1 (Bay Position) IEC 61850-8-1 IEC 61850-9-2LE / IEC61869-9 LEVEL 0 (Switchgear) Merging Unit Merging Unit Merging Unit Process Bus

  7. SV Alignment • Currents and Voltages can be measured by several MU • Each SV has a Sample Counter (smpCnt) used by the IED that receives the frames to make the alignment: • 50 Hz: 0 – 3999 • 60 Hz: 0 - 4799 • MU are synchronized (IRIG-B, PPS, IEEE1588). Reception on PPS signal forces the sample number 0, the rest are based on the internal MU clock • SV from different MU can arrive at different times. Delays due to: • MU processing time • Communication network MU works with 80samples/cycle delay must be considered

  8. SV Alignment

  9. Sampling Frequency Change • Two options to convert a conventional IED into process bus: • Adapt the filters to work with the new sampling frequency • Change the sample frequency and use the same filters • MU: 80 s/c • Frequency tracking • Protection algorithms • IED: 32 s/c

  10. Frequency Tracking • Frequency tracking: algorithm that modifies the time between samples based on the frequency measurement to make the DFT window expand exactly one cycle • Sampling frequency of the MU is fixed (80 samples per 50 / 60 Hz cycle) without changing with the frequency • Frequency tracking: if SV are directly used, errors during off-nominal frequencies will appear. • The samples must span exactly one cycle. • Harmonic influence must be also taken into account

  11. Estimation of Lost SV • SV can be lost • Lost SV can generate phasor errors during one cycle • Blocking will delay the operation for too long • Estimation on SV

  12. Estimation of Lost SV • SV is consider as lost: • Delay time • Quality invalid • Synchronized flag FALSE • Estimation. Replaced by: • Zeros • Value of last SV • New SV after lost SV • Interpolation

  13. Conclusions • A time delay must be considered when time alignment is performed • Decision between • Changing from the MU sampling rate to the conventional relay sampling (allows maintaining the digital filters and protection algorithms) • Work with the MU sampling rate • Frequency tracking is needed because of the fixed sampling rate of the MU. Harmonics influence must be taken into account. • Estimation of lost SV is a must. It should be developed to support SV lost also under harmonics presence.

  14. Thank you Iñigo Ferrero inigo.ferrero@cggloblal.com

More Related