Utah Regulatory Program Evaluation Year 2002

1. Review of Blasting Procedures 1 Utah Regulatory Program  Evaluation Year 2002 Review of Blasting Procedures to Ensure Public Notice, Public Participation, and Public Safety

2. Review of Blasting Procedures 2 Topic Evaluation Team

3. Review of Blasting Procedures 3 SMCRA GoalSection 515 (b) (15) A) provide written notice, B) maintain a log of the blasts, C) limit the blasts based on physical conditions of the site, D) require that blasting be conducted by certified persons, E) provide for pre-blast surveys

4. Review of Blasting Procedures 4 Reason for Topic Selection Surface Blasting in Utah has been infrequent Inception of surface mining in Utah (Whisky Creek Mine) Will ensure that Customer Service Needs are met by providing public notice, public participation, and public safety.

5. Review of Blasting Procedures 5 Planned Review Records review covering the last 3 years 3 mines would be chosen to further evaluate. Records review in DOGM Office On-Site Evaluation

6. Review of Blasting Procedures 6 Records Review Required blast plan Blast schedule publication and distribution Comments from structure owners (1/2 mile) Pre-blast survey Seismic monitoring records

7. Review of Blasting Procedures 7 On-Site Evaluation Records Maintained at mine site Blasting logs Blast design and diagrams Notice of publication Blast certification Blast Warning Signs

8. Review of Blasting Procedures 8 Mines Evaluated White Oak (Whisky Creek Mine) Dugout Canyon Mine Star Point Mine

9. Review of Blasting Procedures 9

10. Review of Blasting Procedures 10

11. Review of Blasting Procedures 11

12. Review of Blasting Procedures 12

13. Review of Blasting Procedures 13

14. Review of Blasting Procedures 14

15. Review of Blasting Procedures 15

16. Review of Blasting Procedures 16

17. Review of Blasting Procedures 17

18. Review of Blasting Procedures 18

19. Review of Blasting Procedures 19

20. Review of Blasting Procedures 20 CONCLUSIONS The requirements as they relate to public notice, public participation, and public safety have been met All structures within � mile were identified Notification for pre-blast survey and blast schedule were provided to all structure owners. Blasting records including blast designs were maintained. (although evidence of the required written notification could not be produced for two of the mines) Blasting was done by a Utah Certified Blaster.

21. Review of Blasting Procedures 21 RECOMMENDATIONS DOGM should ensure that plans include provisions for the permittee to provide required written public notifications and provide evidence that the required written notifications were executed in a timely manner. DOGM should inform permittees that newspaper publication is not required for underground coal mining and reclamation activities.