1 / 41

Intro to Restoration Ecology

Intro to Restoration Ecology. ENSC 201 – Spring 2008. Why do we need restoration?. 53 % of wetlands lost nationwide > 35 % of wetlands lost in Vermont 50-70% loss of brackish intertidal mudflats, shores, and coastal plains 90 % loss of aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay

kevyn
Download Presentation

Intro to Restoration Ecology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intro to Restoration Ecology ENSC 201 – Spring 2008

  2. Why do we need restoration? • 53 % of wetlands lost nationwide • > 35 % of wetlands lost in Vermont • 50-70% loss of brackish intertidal mudflats, shores, and coastal plains • 90 % loss of aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay • 70 % loss of riparian forests nationwide • 90 % loss of old-growth forests nationwide • 99.5 % loss of old-growth forests in the eastern U.S. • 97 % loss of pine-oak-heathland in the Lake Champlain Basin • 90 % loss of short and tall-grass prairie ecosystems nationwide • 90 % of shrub-steppe ecosystems degraded by livestock grazing nationwide Source: Noss et al (1995)

  3. http://www.millenniumassessment.org//en/index.aspx

  4. How do we prioritize areas for restoration? • Need • Ecological value • What is the relative importance of different sites for ecosystem functioning? • Examples: • Riparian areas • Headwaters • Estuaries • Unstable uplands • Wetland complexes • Rare communities • Critical habitats for particular species • Degree of degradation? • Degree of threat  more applicable for identifying areas in need of protection or conservation • Opportunity

  5. How does restoration fit into an overall conservation or sustainability strategy? The Functional Landscape Approach

  6. But what about entire ecosystems that have been severely degrade? Answer: We need an ecosystem-level restoration approach

  7. Restoration as The Acid Test of Ecology: Do we understand how ecosystems work well enough to reconstruct them?

  8. It helps to have a conceptual model of the system

  9. Ecosystem-Level Restoration • Focus on ecological processes • Examples: • Soil productivity • Natural disturbance dynamics • Hydrology • Ecological succession!

  10. Tiered Restoration Ecosystem restoration: “Bringing back an entire system or the dynamics of that system” Large-scale Coordinated restoration of critical areas as per an overall ecosystem management plan Site-specific restoration, remediation, mitigation, etc. Small-scale

  11. Atlantic Rainforest Restoration • The Atlantic rainforest once covered 400,000 square miles • Only 7% remains • 450 tree species per hectare • 2.7% of world’s plant species just in what is left • Testing innovative funding mechanisms  U.S. companies paying for carbon sequestration • How do we restore it?

  12. Carbon Revenue • Estimates of potential carbon credit values range from $4 to $60 (or even $110) per ton of C. • European market currently trading for $8 to $20 per metric ton. • Future value could increase substantially as international carbon markets develop.

  13. Chicago Climate Exchange • “Voluntary ‘Cap and Trade’ greenhouse gas emission reduction and trading system.” • One Mg Carbon trading for about $5 • Membership from the forest products industry includes: • Abitibi-Consolidated • Aracruz Celulose S.A. • Cenibra Nipo Brasiliera S.A. • International Paper • Klabin S.A. • MeadWestvaco Corp. • Stora Enso North America • Suzano Papel E Celulose SA • Temple-Inland Inc

  14. Figure from Ingerson. 2007.

  15. Forest Cover Trends in New England Since European Settlement

  16. Differences Between Pre-Settlement and Current Forests in VT and NH Forest Composition Species:Abundance: Chestnut Elm Beech Sugar Maple Hemlock White Pine Red Spruce White Birch Cottonwood Pin Cherry Red Maple Communities:Abundance: Old-Growth Forest of All Types Floodplain Silver Maple and Sugar Maple Rich Lowland Oak/Basswood/Ash Forested Wetlands Native Grasslands and Shrublands Functionally Extirpated Sources: Cogbill (2000); McLachlan et al. (2000); Fuller et al. 1998;Foster 1992; Siccama (1971)

  17. Prescribed Fire

  18. Restoration as Experimentation What are the elements of experimental design?

  19. FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

  20. Seedling Mortality

  21. Effectiveness of Tubes

More Related