1 / 24

The Analysis of State of Traffic Safety in the Republic of Serbia

The Republic of Serbia Ministry of the Interior Traffic Police Directorate. The Analysis of State of Traffic Safety in the Republic of Serbia. Milomir Cabarkapa Assistant Chief of Traffic Police Directorate.

kin
Download Presentation

The Analysis of State of Traffic Safety in the Republic of Serbia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Republic of Serbia Ministry of the Interior Traffic Police Directorate • The Analysis of State of Traffic Safety in the Republic of Serbia Milomir Cabarkapa Assistant Chief of Traffic Police Directorate

  2. Number of people killed in traffic accidents, in the periodfrom1991. until2010. in the Republic of Serbia

  3. Number of people killed in traffic accidents in the Republic of Serbia in the period from 2002. until 2010.

  4. REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INJURED AND KILLED IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ABSOLUTE INDICATORS OF TRAFFIC SAFETY

  5. ABSOLUTE INDICATORS OF TRAFFIC SAFETY

  6. Number of people KILLED in traffic accidents per month; Comparison between years 2009. and 2010.

  7. WEAKENING OF THE EFFECT OF THE NEW LAW ON TRAFFIC SAFETY?! Number of people killed in traffic accidents

  8. Number of people INJURED per month; Comparison between years 2009. and 2010.

  9. WEAKENING OF THE EFFECT OF THE NEW LAW ON TRAFFIC SAFETY?! Number of people injured in traffic accidents

  10. Number of people KILLED per month; Comparison between mean values in the period from 2002 until 2009. and the year 2010.

  11. Number of people with minor injuries per month, comparison between the period from 2002-2009. and year 2010. година

  12. Increased and reduced number of fatalities in the EU countries and Serbia in percents – A comparison 2001-2009 The Republic of Serbia comparing to other countries

  13. PUBLIC RISK IN CERTAIN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND SERBIA IN 2001.

  14. 2001 PUBLIC RISK IN CERTAIN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND SERBIA IN 2001.

  15. PUBLIC RISK IN CERTAIN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND SERBIAIN 2009.

  16. 2009 PUBLIC RISK IN CERTAIN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AND SERBIAIN 2009.

  17. PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE KILLED IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE CATEGORY OF TRAFFIC PARTICIPANT YEAR 2010. YEAR 2009.

  18. PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE KILLED IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE CAUSE OF AN ACCIDENT; YEARS 2009. AND 2010.

  19. WHAT TO WE EXPECT - DEMAND? FromLocal self-government– active participation in solving the Local self-government problem of traffic safety within its territory; FromRoad Management Company – constant improvement of road safety (planning, designing, construction and maintenance); FromEducation Sector – to provide education on traffic in pre- schools as well as in schools; FromExpert organizationsfor traffic safety project designs and to design measures, implement these measures and constantly publish the results of implemented measures;

  20. WHAT DO WE EXPECT- DEMAND? - From Science Institutions – to conduct researches, carry out academic analyses and define dominant problems based on their results, as well as to promote scientific researches – From Non-governmental organizations -to secure a support and take the leading role in matters such as campaigns and other initiatives in this area; From Insurance companies - to define an insurance system which will stimulate safe behavior in traffic, follow and inform on traffic accidents, especially on those not recorded by police; – From Traffic Safety Agency - to give its contribution to traffic safety improvement using all the available resources, being obliged by the law, and in that way justify its very important role in the system of traffic safety in the Republic of Serbia;

  21. WHAT DO WE EXPECT – DEMAND FROM OURSELVES? From Traffic Police– to enforce the Law strictly, and through restriction and education impact the betterment of drivers’ behavior, to be fully efficient, and save the special activities for the extremely risky behavior observed in traffic.

  22. WHAT WE EXPECT ? FROM ALL OTHER INSTITUTIONS – WE EXPECT, COOPERATION AND TEAM WORK OF ALL INSTITUTIONS INCLUDED IN TRAFFIC SAFETY SYSTEMS WHICH HAVE RESPONSIBILITY

  23. THANK YOU! Traffic Police Administration 2 MihajlaPupina Boulevard, Belgrade SERBIAhttp://prezentacije.mup.gov.rs/usp/index.html Е-mail:usp@mup.gov.rsPhone (00381) 11 311-09-39

More Related