1 / 29

Disability & rural health: proofing what for whom?

Disability & rural health: proofing what for whom? . Kate Sherry RHAP Rural-Proofing Program Stakeholders’ Forum 26 th November 2013. Rural Rehab South Africa. Founded September 2011 Physio , Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, Audiology 2-fold purpose: - Policy input (NDOH, NDOE)

kina
Download Presentation

Disability & rural health: proofing what for whom?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Disability & rural health:proofing what for whom? Kate Sherry RHAP Rural-Proofing Program Stakeholders’ Forum 26th November 2013

  2. Rural Rehab South Africa • Founded September 2011 • Physio, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, Audiology • 2-fold purpose: - Policy input (NDOH, NDOE) - Promoting rural careers for therapists, including: - Training institution input - Rural therapists’ support network - Development of best practice

  3. So what is “rehab”?

  4. Disability in context

  5. Disability as a development issue • Links with poverty: Disabled people = 20% of poorest people (World Bank in Yeo 2003) • Links with rurality: 80% of chronically poor households = rural (Aliber 2001) • Links with MDG’s: Cannot eradicate poverty unless PWD’s are included in development efforts (Lee 1999) • Population estimates: 4-10%, depending on source and definitions

  6. Population at risk of/affected by disability • Quadruple burden of disease: - HIV/AIDS & TB –> neurological, developmental, and other impairments - NCD’s –> stroke, amputation, loss of eyesight, loss of vital capacity, MENTAL HEALTH - Maternal & child care –> birth trauma leading to neurological and developmental impairments, birth defects, intrauterine impairment (e.g. FAS) - Trauma & violence -> SCI, TBI, orthopaedic, mental health sequelae MAJORITYof health-care users are at risk (NB prevention) Most households will have a disabled member at some point

  7. Role of environment in determining level of participation restriction

  8. So what do therapists do?

  9. Ways of thinking about disability • “Medical model”: - Individual, problem-centred focus Intervention response: “Fix what is broken” Services: technical, institution-centred, individual-focused Blind spot: impairments that cannot be “fixed”

  10. Ways of thinking about disability (2) • “Welfare model” - Individual (sometimes family), basic needs & maintenance focus Intervention response: “care” Services: traditionally institution-based Blind spots: long-term sustainability, isolation

  11. Ways of thinking about disability (3) • “Social model” - Focus on barriers in society, aim at full participation Intervention response: create environments that aim at inclusion- “community-based rehabilitation” (CBR) Services: integrated, community-based, multisectoral Blind spot: value of technical rehabilitation

  12. So what? • Each model dictates different service emphasis, different service delivery platform • Current international thinking most strongly influenced by International Classification of Functioning (ICF) (WHO,2001) System of describing functioning of person with a health condition (replacing “disability and handicap”) Attempts balance between need for individual/technical rehab and community-level interventions • Global “best practice WHO Guidelines on Community-Based Rehabilitation (2010)

  13. CBR: what does it mean? • Rehab belongs to every sector, not just health • “Rehabilitation” used in 2 senses – the whole picture, AND the technical service offered under health cluster • Shares principles with PHC: accessibility, affordability, sustainability, community participation, etc

  14. In South Africa: • Strong disability movement during 1980’s and 1990’s – relatively progressive policy put in place by post-1994 administration • Integrated National Disability Strategy (1997) • Policies based on CBR exist in Health (National Rehab Policy, 2009), Education (White Paper 6 on Inclusive Education, 2001) and Social Development (DSD Policy on Disability, 2010), amongst others • Health has been the most proactive sector, employs the majority of rehab therapists • Nonetheless, implementation of the NRP has not really been realised

  15. Key policies for rehab in South Africa • Constitution of South Africa (1996) • Integrated National Disability Strategy (1997) • Norms & Standards for a Comprehensive PHC Package (2000 & 2010) • National Rehabilitation Policy (2000) • Community Service for Rehab Professionals (2003) • Assistive Devices Policy (2003) • Uniform Patient Fees System (annual) • Free Health Care for PWD’s (2003) • UN Convention on the Rights of PWD’s (2006, ratified by SA 2007)

  16. A picture of the sector • Split between disability movement and (mainstream) professionals • Fragmentation within disability movement • Professional territorialism and lack of unity • Tertiary, institution-focused, and private sector weighting • Mid-level worker debate • Lack of national and provincial leadership in public sector

  17. Recent progress • Public sector professional forums move for joint meeting • Professional organisations desire to increase public sector membership • Training institutions: increased PHC focus • Rural community service placements • SA ratifies UNCRPD • National Rehabilitation Task Team • Role of RuReSA

  18. Rehab in health sector context • Competition of priorities: underrated by managers and officials • Rehab/disability is a stigmatised and overlooked issue Impact on institutional placement and power Impact on HR: recruitment and retention • Policy as PROCESS (Walt & Gilson 1994): e.g. research in Umzimvubusubdistrict, Sherry & Watson 2010

  19. Rehab as a “silo” is ineffective Disability needs to be integrated in every program, at every level – if it is to be addressed at all A major attitudeshift is needed

  20. Health policies need to be disability-proofed, as well as rural-proofed

  21. 3 aspects to rural rehab policy work • Getting basic disability/rehab policies in place • Making sure these are rural-friendly • Making sure all health policies are disability-friendly

  22. Getting basic rehab policies in place • Historical lack of clear service level agreements – provincially dependent, no benchmarks • E.g.NHI Rehab Task Team – service delivery platform & basic service package, staffing allocations

  23. Rural issues in rehab • ACCESS ACCESSACCESS • Terrain and infrastructure • Economic implications • HR challenges • Sustained engagement with service Service model: home & clinic based- OUTREACH broad scope mid-level worker cadre continuity of care, record-keeping & tracing time allocations

  24. Ensuring rehab policies are rural-friendly Examples: • Mid-level worker debate: generic vs profession-specific • Staffing structure e.g. KZN 2013

  25. Ensuring health policies are rehab-friendly Examples: • CCG level 1 training (2012): presence of a disabled person signifies a vulnerable household • All standard treatment guidelines: need to include referral to rehab – audit implications • Access to services (DPW, other): include sign-language interpreters, large-print/braille text, multiple media, strategies for reaching a hard-to-reach population, physical access, signage, security/assistance

  26. Backing other rural-rehab-friendly policies • E.g. PHC re-engineering: • Shift to household-level • Strengthen CHW networks • Prevention and health promotion • We add: • Outreach budgeted and planned for • District hospital as hub • Mid-level rehab workers at clinic level • Role of therapists in schools addressed

  27. Where to from here? • Need for baseline data • Rural-friendly basic rehab package • Commitment to HR and budget • Translation at provincial level • Integration across programs within health • Unite disability sector for stronger voice • Tackle other sectors…

  28. Thank you!Questions?

More Related