1 / 43

Untalented but Successful

Untalented but Successful. Olivier GERGAUD Univ. de Reims – Univ. Paris 1 Joint with Vincenzo VERARDI CRED, Namur. Réactions : « On aimerait que Libé ouvre ses colonnes à des économistes qui bossent sur de vrais sujets, plutôt que de s'amuser dans la cour de récré », Victoria Beckham

kishi
Download Presentation

Untalented but Successful

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Untalented but Successful Olivier GERGAUD Univ. de Reims – Univ. Paris 1 Joint with Vincenzo VERARDI CRED, Namur

  2. Réactions : « On aimerait que Libé ouvre ses colonnes à des économistes qui bossent sur de vrais sujets, plutôt que de s'amuser dans la cour de récré », Victoria Beckham « Laisser les économistes jouer dans la cour d'école c'est aussi leur permettre de repenser la théorie classique […] Il n'y a qu'en se posant des questions iconoclastes que la science économique avance », Captain Cavern

  3. Theory of Superstars: Fundamentals • Rosen (1981) : talent based Small differences in talent can lead to large earnings differences and eventually to the emergence of superstars. Inferior talent is not a substitute for superior talent. • Adler (1985) : talent independent Stars can even emerge among equally-talented individuals. Network effects.

  4. Theory of Superstars: Fundamentals Rosen (1981) : talent based Inferior talent is not a substitute for superior talent. Mother

  5. Theory of Superstars: Fundamentals Adler (1985): talent independent (network) Mother

  6. Superstars phenomenon :Adler (2005) Adler (2005) p.3, “Superstars [...] are individuals who attain considerable prominence and success in their field and whose earnings as a result are significantly greater than the earnings of their competitors”.

  7. Superstars phenomenon :Adler (2005) "Superstars attain earnings significantly greater than their competitors" Meaning: For a similar level of talent, some individuals will be valued more than others.

  8. Talent: definition Talent \Tal"ent\, n. [F., fr. L. talentum] 1. Among the ancient Greeks, a weight and a denomination of money equal to 60 min[ae] or 6,000 drachm[ae]. Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

  9. Talent: definition (cont.) 4. Intellectual ability, natural or acquired; mental endowment or capacity; skill in accomplishing; a special gift, particularly in business, art, or the like; faculty. Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

  10. Motivation • Are Rosen-MacDonald and Adler Theories of Superstars complementary?

  11. Empirical Evidence : Fuzzy • Emergence of superstars may be… • … The reward for a greater talent: à la Rosen (1981) • Hamlen (1991) • Hamlen (1994) • Lucifora and Simmons (2003) • … Independent of talent: à la Adler (1985) • Blass (1992) • Chung and Cox (1994)

  12. (Music) Link quality of voice and sales but find no evidence of Rosen’s effect Empirical Evidence : Fuzzy • Emergence of superstars may be… • … The reward for a greater talent: à la Rosen (1981) • Hamlen (1991) • Hamlen (1994) • … Independent of talent: à la Adler • Blass (1992) • Chung and Cox (1994)

  13. Empirical Evidence : Fuzzy • Emergence of superstars may be… • … The reward for a greater talent: à la Rosen (1981) • Lucifora and Simmons (2003) : (Soccer) convex structure of rewards but measure of talent questionable, endogenous (# of goals) : weak evidence of a Rosen effect “If we think of the top three players as the best players in Italian football measured by our goals per season indicator, then […] our results are consistent with Rosen’s (1981) theory of superstars”, Lucifora and Simmons (03)

  14. Empirical Evidence : Fuzzy • Emergence of superstars may be… • … The reward for a greater talent: à la Rosen (1981) • Hamlen (1991); • Hamlen (1994). • … Independent of talent: à la Adler (1985) • Blass (1992) (Baseball) finds evidence against Rosen: experience is more important than talent

  15. Empirical Evidence : Fuzzy • Emergence of superstars may be… • … The reward for a greater talent: à la Rosen (1981) • Hamlen (1991); • Hamlen (1994). • … Independent of talent: à la Adler (1985) • Chung and Cox (1994) (Music) find evidence against Rosen, there is a snowball effect on CD sold, success is the result of a prob. mechanismwhich predicts that “artistic outputs will be concentrated among a few lucky individuals”

  16. How to test theories of superstars? Use data where: • Talent is objectively measurable • There is no unobserved heterogeneity • Superstars exist • Rarity can be separated from talent • Earning is measured with precision • Role of agents or managers is negligible In other words, use quasi-experimental data

  17. Solution: Quasi-experimental dataset • Pokemon TCG

  18. (i.e. ) Solution: Quasi-experimental dataset • Pokemon TCG • All characteristics of monsters are available • Talent is objectively summarized in a one-dimensional indicator • Superstars are present • Trading prices are available • Objective rarity is provided • There are no agents …

  19. Supply of the cards • First-hand market: 19 decks in 2000 • Not included: 65% • [1,4] times: 32% • > 4 times: 3% • No individual prices. • Bad cards >>> Very good cards. • Second-hand market: • Retailers, specialized games shops or websites • Individual cards  Individual prices. • SCRYE: Median price charged by retail outlets across the US and Canada.

  20. Attack Damage 12 A sample card Name Hit Points Type Power Pokemon Data Attack Cost Weakness and Resistance Level Number

  21. 76 A sample card Name Hit Points Type Power Pokemon Data Attack Cost Attack Damage Weakness and Resistance Level Number

  22. Advantages of our dataset • Talent (Level): • fully observable, • totally objective, • explicitly provided in the cards. • Supply : • exogenously controlled by a single firm. • Price : • measure of success, • proxy for consumers' preferences.

  23. 20$ 13$ 41 52 Rosen effect Convexity: « Greater magnification of the earnings-talent gradient increasing sharply near the top of the scale. »

  24. 1.5$ 0.5$ 12 20 Adler effect? Snowball effect: «Superstars may emerge even among equally-talented individuals»

  25. The empirical procedure • First step: • Estimate a Robust Hedonic Price Function for the Pokémon TCG • Second step: • Detect outliers via a simple (robust) analysis of the residuals and determine the fair price for all individuals • Third step: • Graph the overprized individuals • Fourth step: • Estimate a Reweighted Hedonic Price Function for the Pokémon TCG

  26. Superstar Superstar P Superstar Classical regression Masking effect Swamping effect OLS Z

  27. Superstar Superstar P Superstar Robust regression Robust regression Z

  28. LTS regression : Intuition • Decide a percentage of trimming (α%) that indicates the degree of resistance to outliers. • Run OLS on all samples having (1-α%) of the data • Choose the regression with the best fit

  29. LTS regression: example • N = 100 & trimming 25% • Number of sub samples: • Number of sub samples: 2.42 1023

  30. 2.42 1023?? • Fast-LTS algorithm: • based on the min # of • sub samples guaranteeing • at least one non-corrupt sample

  31. The Specification Convex Observed price Creature's characteristics Card's setting Supply conditions Rarity Rosen effect

  32. The Specification

  33. The Specification Estimate robust residuals (ri ) by LTS

  34. Overpricing can be estimated by: The Specification Estimate robust residuals (ri ) by LTS

  35. How to test Rosen effect? • Run a reweighted least squares hedonic price function • Check if we observe a convexity

  36. Results … …

  37. Predicted by Rosen Predicted by Adler Charizard Blastoise Graphically Price Venusaur Gyarados Talent

  38. Identifying Superstars (year 2000) • Who is sold at more than 25% of its fair price?

  39. Evolution of Superstars

  40. Conclusion: Innovations • Original Dataset: Collectible cards • Robust estimation methods • Original Results…

  41. Conclusion: Original Results • Rosen (81) and Adler (85): complementary • Untalented but Successful: why not !!! • “We are all made of stars”

  42. Untalented but Successful Olivier GERGAUD Université de Reims Joint with Vincenzo VERARDI CRED - Namur Talented - Unsuccessful Electrode On the job market ! Untalented - Successful Pikachu

More Related