1 / 23

Interferometric Modulator Display

Team Members:. LE GROS Christophe MAQUEDA LÓPEZ Mariazel OTTONELLO BRIANO Floria. PIZZATO Daniel SADRINI Jury. ACCOTO Celso ADHAM Mohamed LARRIEU JeanCharles. Interferometric Modulator Display. Outline. Market Analysis Building Blocks Architecture/Materials

kitra
Download Presentation

Interferometric Modulator Display

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Team Members: LE GROS Christophe MAQUEDA LÓPEZ Mariazel OTTONELLO BRIANO Floria PIZZATO Daniel SADRINI Jury ACCOTO Celso ADHAM Mohamed LARRIEU JeanCharles Interferometric Modulator Display

  2. Outline Market Analysis Building Blocks Architecture/Materials Product Specifications Time schedule (Gantt diagram) Conclusions

  3. Market Evolution

  4. Power Gap in Nowadays Market

  5. IMOD Position in Display Market

  6. System block diagram Embodiment of an electronicdeviceincorporating a 3x3 interferometricmodulator display. Two adjacent interferometricmodulators

  7. System block diagram • TPS65131 microcontroller: • adapted for small to medium size displays • output voltage up to 15V and negative output voltage down to -15V • compatible with a Li-ion battery Block Diagram illustrating an embodiment of a visual Display Device

  8. Basic Architecture of an IMOD M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Brilliant Displays” Cheng-Yao Lo et al., “MEMS-Controlled Paper-Like Transmissive Flexible Display” Jeffrey B. Sampsell, “MEMS-BasedDisplayTechnology Drives Next-Generation FPDs for Mobile Apps.”

  9. Basic Architecture of an IMOD M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Brilliant Displays” Cheng-Yao Lo et al., “MEMS-Controlled Paper-Like Transmissive Flexible Display” Jeffrey B. Sampsell, “MEMS-BasedDisplayTechnology Drives Next-Generation FPDs for Mobile Apps.”

  10. Basic Architecture of an IMOD GLASS Substrate M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Brilliant Displays” Cheng-Yao Lo et al., “MEMS-Controlled Paper-Like Transmissive Flexible Display” Jeffrey B. Sampsell, “MEMS-BasedDisplayTechnology Drives Next-Generation FPDs for Mobile Apps.”

  11. Basic Architecture of an IMOD PEN Reflectivesurfaces M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Brilliant Displays” Cheng-Yao Lo et al., “MEMS-Controlled Paper-Like Transmissive Flexible Display” Jeffrey B. Sampsell, “MEMS-BasedDisplayTechnology Drives Next-Generation FPDs for Mobile Apps.”

  12. Basic Architecture of an IMOD ITO, Al, Au, Ag, MoCr Electrodes Mark W. Miles, “Toward an iMoD ecosystem”

  13. Basic Architecture of an IMOD GLASS, SiO₂ Posts M. Mitchell Waldrop, “Brilliant Displays” Cheng-Yao Lo et al., “MEMS-Controlled Paper-Like Transmissive Flexible Display” Jeffrey B. Sampsell, “MEMS-BasedDisplayTechnology Drives Next-Generation FPDs for Mobile Apps.”

  14. Basic Architecture of an IMOD Parallax 3D PhotonicCrystals André C. Arsenault et al., “Photonic-crystal full-colourdisplays”

  15. Specifications

  16. Specifications • Parameters that are not yet estimated • Driving Voltage • Cost • Contrast • Weight • Lifetime

  17. Conclusion • The market seems to be very attractive. • The fundamental blocks of the display are defined. • The overall tasks are assigned to the different work groups. • Some improvements are understudy.

  18. Thank you for the attention!!!

  19. Exemples: switchingspeed • Each pixel lit per 17 ms (20 Europe) beforebeenredrawn • LCD : 20 ms in year 2000 (uselessfor video apps)  2 ms moderndisplays. • CRT : < 1ms. • OLED : 0.001 ms. • Plasma : 0.001 ms. • Techniquestoincrease the switcingspeed: • Boost the drivingvoltage • Super sampling : built intermediate frames

  20. Exemples: cost & resolution & weight • Cost: • OLED : ~ $24,000 per square meter • LCD : ~ $800 per square meter • Resolution: • Iphone : 362 ppi • Mirasol IMOD : 223 ppi • Ipad : 132 ppi • Weight : • Ipad : 132 g for 241x185mm

  21. Exemples: Contrast & drivingvoltage • Contrast: ratio of the luminance of the brightest color (white) to that of the darkest color (black) • LCD : 5000 : 1 Dynamic (underpowerbacklight) • 1000 : 1 Static • CRT : >3000 : 1 Static • Plasma : 5000 : 1 Static • OLED : 2000 : 1 to 1,000,000: 1 (in a perfectly dark room) • Drivingvoltage: dependof the battery: • Iphone : 3.7 V • Ipad : 3.7 V

  22. Exemples: Powerconsumption (mW) • Operating Assumptions: 80% active time in an office, 10% in bright light and 10% at night (dim light) • Display power includes the display plus backlight power for an LCD and frontlight power for an IMOD • source : PikeResearch

  23. Exemples: Numberofcolours Iphonetouch : 262k = 18 bit colours

More Related