1 / 21

Increasing production costs = more capital at risk

Commodity Production and Risk C ory Walters cgwalters@uky.edu 859-421-6354 University of Kentucky Ag Econ/ANR Update October 2012. Increasing production costs = more capital at risk More capital at risk = stronger need for risk management

konane
Download Presentation

Increasing production costs = more capital at risk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Commodity Production and RiskCory Walterscgwalters@uky.edu859-421-6354University of KentuckyAg Econ/ANR UpdateOctober 2012

  2. Increasing production costs = more capital at risk • More capital at risk = stronger need for risk management • Crop Insurance can help alleviate potential problems • Policy needs to be set up correctly

  3. Crop Insurance • Premium increased from $1 billion in 1994 to over $11 billion in 2011 (7 billion in subsidy) • Insured acres increased from 100 million to 265 million • Continuously changing, new for 2012 • Reduced premium rates in corn belt • Trend adjustment for corn and soybeans in select states/counties in Kentucky. • New for 2013 • Trend Adjustment (TA) for wheat. Currently not available in Kentucky. • High Risk Alternate Coverage Endorsement (HR-ACE) • http://www.rma.usda.gov/help/faq/highrisk.html

  4. Understanding Crop Insurance During a Drought/Heat • Contract decisions are made at the beginning of each year • For an MPCI policy three primary decisions: coverage level, unit type, insurance type. Other decisions include electing TA, HR-ACE • I will walk through each decision providing a motivation

  5. Corn Yield • Historical farm level yield data • Over 32 years across multiple fields, data adjusted for trend • 50% chance of 150 bpa, 10% chance of 100 bpa, 10% chance of 170 bpa • KEY: Grain production is risky 2012

  6. Yield Crop insurance yield guarantee • 75% coverage level • Expect insurance to pay about 12% of the time or 12 of 100 draws. Lots of zero payments • Very important when it does pay- costs are going up • Value of insurance is not guarantee

  7. MPCI Insurance Contract Choices • Coverage level • Unit Type • Insurance Type • Price level • Not discussed • Producer can select percentage of base price to insure • Available contract options depend upon crop and location

  8. Coverage Level • Producer selects between 50 to 85 percent in 5 percent increments • Decision directly impacts guarantee • Higher coverage level implies larger guarantee and higher chance of payments but also more in premiums • Decision based upon probability of payments, amount of desired $ of coverage and budget • Decision impacts subsidy rate

  9. Corn Yield Crop insurance yield guarantee • Changing the coverage level directly shifts the guarantee • Shifting the guarantee changes the probability of payments

  10. Premium Subsidies (for 2012), in Percent

  11. Unit Type • Represents the number of independent insurance units. FSA number = optional units, crop = enterprise. • Producer selects between optional, basic, enterprise or whole farm units • Decision between optional and enterprise depends upon how pooled risks are • Drought can be considered a pooled risk • Centralized hail storm is not • Higher premiums associated with selecting optional units • Subsidy rates change with unit type

  12. Premium Subsidies (for 2012), in Percent

  13. Insurance Type • Producer selects between: Yield, Revenue with harvest price exclusion (HPE) (implied put option), Revenue (implied put and call option) • Decision depends upon price expectations • Don’t care about prices then select yield • Convinced they are going down then select Revenue with HPE • Convinced they are going to drastically change then select Revenue insurance • Subsidy rates are the same across insurance types • Therefore producer gets more subsidy dollars when selecting the most expensive policy, i.e., revenue insurance • over yield insurance

  14. Insurance Type • A = Increase in premium cost. Benefit of downward price protection • B = Increase in premium cost. Benefit of upward price protection

  15. Conclusions • Crop insurance can be a valuable tool in protecting against unforeseen events (yield and price) but it must be set up properly. • Identify important risks • Drought, hail, wind, heat, etc… • Drought/heat is a reminder of how bad it can get • Good for less experienced producers • Risk Managers – DO NOT forget the big risks • Difficult to value low probability events, however cost of protection is low

  16. Historical Yearly Average Corn Price and Standard Deviation, 1992/93 to 2012/13

  17. World Inventory Levels • Coarse grain ending stocks • Overall 12% less than last year • Less in U.S., Canada • Slight gain in Argentina • Soybeans • Overall slight decline from last year • Less in U.S., Argentina • More in Brazil

  18. In times of short supply prices are more sensitive to changes in quantities: p Market demand Different price effects q Same shock

  19. Conclusions • Prices are quite high relative to historical standards • Corn production • This years crop was similar to 2007’s crop size • Difference in planted acre and yield combinations • More acres with less yield in 2012 vs. 2007 • Likely see additional acres in 2013 – needed to replenish U.S. ending stocks • Globally – response to high prices will be to increase production through additional acres • Corn consumption in both U.S. and foreign countries has dropped off a bit • Economic impacts due to high prices (?) • In times of short stocks, prices are more sensitive to changes in quantity – thus could experience a spike • Prices will be very sensitive to production (acreage, weather) events.

More Related