1 / 15

Nature Films vs. Critical Environmental Documentaries

Nature Films vs. Critical Environmental Documentaries. Media, Politics and the Environment Miklos Sukosd. Nature films. Documentary film claims to represent reality “Representation of reality”: realism (recording, documentation)

korene
Download Presentation

Nature Films vs. Critical Environmental Documentaries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nature Films vs. Critical Environmental Documentaries Media, Politics and the Environment Miklos Sukosd

  2. Nature films • Documentary film claims to represent reality • “Representation of reality”: realism (recording, documentation) • “Representation of reality”: objectivity (detachment, journalistic accuracy, scientific objectivity) • Integrity of filmmaker as guarantee of realism and objectivity • Nature film at “crossroads of science, popular education, art and business” (Vivanco, 2002) • Key functions are children’s education and adults' entertainment • Such documentaries are BOTH educational tools and market commodities • Do they represent “reality” • How does commodification impact nature films?

  3. Nature films • Assumption: "Wildlife and natural history films are environmentally committed documentaries” (Vivanco, 2002, referring to Bouse, 2000) • Structure, topics, narratives from other (human) film genres • Produced in competitive media markets to capture audiences, to create profit • “Fakery of simulated spectacle and the objectivity of science” • Fantasy world: camera tricks (slow motions, frog eye, etc.) • Lighting and colors adjusted for aesthetic pleasure

  4. Nature films • Cutting out references to presence of human life (electricity poles, cars, etc.)—like in a costume drama • Cutting out context: safari tourists, documentation/context of filmmaking • Using music and stock sounds • De-familiarizing nature and Earth • Creating a beautiful dream world without people

  5. Nature films • Dramatic framework, narrative: from human stories • Fictionalized narratives • Anthropomorphization of animal families and individuals • Monogamy, responsible parenting, work ethic, late gratification, gender division of labor • Moral values (responsibility, good/bad) implied regarding animals • Violent (bloody) and explicit sexual scenes “censored” • Narrative conventions from mainstream Hollywood films (Bouse 2000)

  6. Nature films: Planet Earth • Main question of nature films: “What is nature good for? What is it worth?” • Plant Earth answer: “Nature is good looking at.” (Richard Beck: Costing Planet Earth, 2010) • Planet Earth (original BBC television series) cost GBP16 Million • Early nature films: feeding animals and animals’ fight • Terrier vs. Wildcat (1906): “animal pornography” • Visual pleasure of watching cruelty and torture of animals (Bouse 2000)

  7. Nature films: Planet Earth • Predation: no coherent interpretation • Threatening (wolves, lions, shark) and beautiful, “visual delight” (dolphins, cheeta) (Beck, 2000) • 21st century eco-cide: “No more spectacle.” • Species are disappearing at increasing rate • Visual representation: human-like animal families and individuals

  8. Nature films: Planet Earth • Filmmakers go after visual pleasures • Utilizing and usurping remaining spots for profits • What remains? “Last wilderness” • Museum of images instead of wildlife • “But visual splendor is a poor index of the health of Earth”s ecosystems.” (Beck 2010) • Representation in film vs. real trends of consumer capitalism as the cause of environmental crisis • Nature films: documentation or aesthetic lies?

  9. Critical environmental documentaries • Focus on environmental problems and human action as their cause • Nature films: implicit, hidden ideology of visual aesthetic pleasure • CED: more or less explicit social criticism • Degree and target of criticism changes • Globalization; humankind; industrialization; urbanization; capitalist corporations • Visual DISpleasure; disturbing images of harm • Global climate change is key issue

  10. Darwins’ Nightmare (2005) • Devastating impact of Nile perch to Lake Victoria in Africa from 1960s • Predatory fish kills other species • Social issues: poverty of fishermen • AIDS and prostitution • Guns from Europe for civil war • External predatory fish symbolic of external predatory global powers

  11. Golden age of documentaries • CED genre grows because of limited mass media exposure of env issues • The End of Suburbia (2006) • Car-based consumer culture in suburbs unsustainable • American Dream based on cheap oil, high consumption and suburban living will collapse • Fuel (2008) • Many faces of oil dependence • Positive: Ways out to green living

  12. An Inconvenient Truth (2006) • Antecedent: Too Hot to Handle (2006) HBO documentary • An Inconvenient Truth (2006) • Gore’s impressive lectures • Science data + visual representation (melting glaciers; future rising sea level) • Sympathetic personal portrait: responsible policy maker • Personal stories: childhood; loss of sister to smoking-related lung cancer (in tobacco-producing family)

  13. An Inconvenient Truth (2006) • End of movie: showing small ways of individual consumer action and collective political action • Huge audiences and agenda setting impact • Promoted by activist groups • Academy Award and Nobel Peace Prize (2007)

  14. The 11th Hour (2007) • Leonard DiCaprio: overview of the Earth’ several crises • Threats to the survival of human species • Footage from 50 environmental experts • Depletion of ocean resources, deforestation, desertification, fossil fuel overuse, epidemics • Convergence of crises • Criticism of divided political class • 1970s Republicans Democrats worked together on environmental legislation

  15. Earth 2100 (2009) • Oil dependence -- 2015 • We are the frogs -- 2040 • Population explosion -- 2060 -- 2070 – • After the flood – 2084 • Vision for 2100

More Related