1 / 21

Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering

SIGIR 2008. Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering. Yandong Liu, Jiang Bian , Eugene Agichtein from Emory & Georgia Tech University. CQA - Community Question Answering 問答 社 群 近來成為一個尋找資訊的有效方法. IS ASKER IN QA COMMUNITY SATISFIED?.

kostya
Download Presentation

Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SIGIR 2008 Predicting information seeker satisfaction incommunity question answering Yandong Liu, Jiang Bian, Eugene Agichteinfrom Emory & Georgia Tech University

  2. CQA -Community Question Answering問答社群近來成為一個尋找資訊的有效方法

  3. IS ASKER IN QA COMMUNITY SATISFIED?

  4. IS ASKER IN QA COMMUNITY SATISFIED? 發問者是否得到滿意的回答 主宰著問答社群的發展或沒落

  5. Asker use case Lifecycle of a question in CQA

  6. Asker use case Lifecycle of a question in CQA

  7. Definition • An asker in a CQA • is considered satisfied iff: • The asker personally has closed the question, selected the best answer, and provided a rating of at least 3 stars for best answer quality.

  8. Definition • The Asker Satisfaction Problem: • Given a question submitted by an asker is CQA, predict whether the user will be satisfied with the answers contributed by the community.

  9. Features • Question • Question-Answer Relationship • Asker User History • Answerer User History • Category Features • Textual Features

  10. Formally a two-class classification problembutprimarily focus on the satisfied class.

  11. Human judgment • Amazon’s paid rater service • Mechanical Turk

  12. Datasets • Random 5000 from top 10000 • Skewed distribution • Satisfaction varies by category

  13. Setting • Methods • Human • Heuristic • Baseline • Evaluation Metrics • Precision • Recall • F1 • Accuracy • ASP • ASP_SVM • ASP_RandomForest • ASP_C4.5 • ASP_Boosting • ASP_NaiveBayes

  14. Result

  15. Selected features

  16. Analysis • Online vs. Offline

  17. Analysis • Feature Ablation

  18. Analysis • Textual Features

  19. Analysis • Past Experience

  20. Conclusion • First to quantify and predict asker satisfaction • Shown importance of asker history is this • Our system outperform human assessors

More Related