1 / 22

Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to Aid in the Identification of Looked-After Children’s Mental He

Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to Aid in the Identification of Looked-After Children’s Mental Health Needs. Robyn A. Marquis, Marie-Pierre Paquet , & Robert J. Flynn. University of Ottawa Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services. Overview.

kristopher
Download Presentation

Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to Aid in the Identification of Looked-After Children’s Mental He

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to Aid in the Identification of Looked-After Children’s Mental Health Needs Robyn A. Marquis, Marie-Pierre Paquet, & Robert J. Flynn University of Ottawa Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services

  2. Overview • Introduction: Foster children & mental health • Proposed research • Results of current study • Conclusions • Questions & comments

  3. Introduction: Foster Children & Mental Health • Child maltreatment associated with pervasive effects on subsequent development • More young people coming into care with complex needs than previous generations • National commission on Family Foster Care: “[children coming into care have] extraordinary health, mental health, behavioural and developmental needs”

  4. More young people in care who have complex needs than previous generations • Prevalence of mental health difficulties among looked-after children varies • Strong association between young person’s behavioural, emotional problems and placement instability

  5. Inattention to the mental health needs of looked-after children documented since 1980s • Early detection of social, behavioural, and psychological problems = priority • Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

  6. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire • SDQ (Goodman, 1997): • 25-item questionnaire; ages 3 to 16 years • 5 scales: • 4 categories of problems • 1 category of strength • Items for each scale selected based on classification concepts of child psychopathology in the DSM-IV and ICD-10

  7. SDQ in Child Welfare Research • SDQ increasingly being used within child welfare to screen psychological adjustment • Small number of published studies • Callaghan et al (2004); Iversen et al (2007); Minnis et al (2006); Teggart & Menary (2005) • SDQ can be used to improve the “detection and treatment of emotional and behavioural problems among looked-after children”

  8. Proposed Research • Purpose: • To investigate the strengths and difficulties of looked-after children in ON, Canada • To compare the strengths and difficulties of looked-after children in Ontario with same-age British and American general population youth

  9. Participants • Convenience sample • N = 492; aged 11 to 15 years • Year 5 (2005-2006) OnLAC project • 43% female; 57% male (mean age = 13.2) • Current Placement: 14.4% Group home 85.6% Foster Home

  10. Measures: SDQ • SDQ part of AAR-C2 of the OnLAC project • Satisfactory reliability and validity (Goodman, 2001) • Able to discriminate between community and clinical samples (Goodman, 1997; Goodman & Scott, 1999) • Sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 80% vs. independent diagnosis of a clinician (Goodman, Ford, Corbin, Meltzer, 2004)

  11. When SDQ scored: • Low Difficulties: Scores below the 80th percentile • Borderline/Medium Difficulties: Scores between the 80th and 90th percentiles • High Difficulties: Scores above the 90th percentile • Borderline & High Difficulties categories = “high risk” for meeting criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis (Goodman, 1997)

  12. Results • Comparison between OnLAC youth and general population British youth and general population American youth • Scores in the Borderline and High Difficulties bands on the subscales and Total Difficulties

  13. Results Emotional Symptoms Score

  14. Conduct Problems Score

  15. Hyperactivity-Inattention Problems Score

  16. Peer Problems Score

  17. Prosocial Behaviour Scores

  18. Total Difficulties Scores

  19. Conclusions & Implications • Ontario children living in out-of-home care: • Have a high level of disturbance • Are under-represented on prosocial behaviour • The results emphasize • SDQ as screening instrument • the importance of engaging in early detection of looked-after children’s mental health needs

  20. Limitations • OnLAC specific • File-based, archival information • No professional follow-up

  21. Question or Comments?

  22. References • Callaghan, J., Young, B., Pace, F., & Vostanis, P. (2004). Evaluation of a new mental health service for looked after children. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 9, 130-148. • Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586. • Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337- 1345. • Goodman, R., Ford, T., Corbin, T., & Meltzer, H. (2004). Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) multi-informant algorithm to screen looked-after children for psychiatric disorders. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, II/25–II/31. • Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17-24. • Iversen, A. C., Jakobsen, R., Havik, T., Hysing, M., & Stormark, K. M. (2007). Mental health problems among child welfare clients living at home. Child Care in Practice, 13, 387-399. • Teggart, T. & Menary, J. (2005). An investigation of the mental health needs of children looked after by Craigvon and Banbridge health and social services trust. Child Care in Practice, 11, 39-49.

More Related