1 / 18

PolicyTracker Conference

PolicyTracker Conference. A military perspective on spectrum liberalisation Peter Bakker, CDR RNLN. Introduction. Peter Bakker Working as the national allied radio frequency agency (NARFA) for policy matters @ NLD MOD No background in telecommunication or transmission systems

kyrie
Download Presentation

PolicyTracker Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PolicyTracker Conference A military perspective on spectrum liberalisation Peter Bakker, CDR RNLN

  2. Introduction • Peter Bakker • Working as the national allied radio frequency agency (NARFA) for policy matters @ NLD MOD • No background in telecommunication or transmission systems • Presenting the NLD (occasionally personal) view, not necessarily shared by NATO partners Introduction

  3. Program • Setting the scene • Spectrum liberalisation aspects • Preserving (national) security Program

  4. International arena • NLD is a NATO nation • NLD forces will operate in a coalition (EU, NATO, UN mission) • Since the 90’s mission area is defined as “anywhere in the world” • Mission expansion – CRO, PK, HA, DR • Cooperation with NGOs or IOs • National security is dependent on global stability 1. Setting the scene

  5. ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE (OSCE) (56) EURO-ATLANTIC PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL (EAPC) (50) Andorra Holy See PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE (PfP) (24) NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY Liechtenstein Turkmenistan Tajikistan1 ORGANISATION (NATO) (26) Monaco MAP (3) Belarus1 United States PARP (20) Canada Norway San Marino Kazakhstan1 Albania2 Iceland Turkey Kyrgyzstan1 Croatia2 Moldova1 FYROM*3 Serbia EUROPEAN UNION (EU) (27) Armenia1 Switzerland Belgium Greece Luxembourg Slovenia Austria Azerbaijan1 Uzbekistan1 Bulgaria Germany Netherlands Spain Cyprus Finland Intensified Dialogue(4) Czech Rep Hungary Poland Ireland Bosnia-Herzegovina Montenegro Denmark Italy Portugal Sweden Estonia Latvia Romania Georgia Ukraine Slovakia France Lithuania Russia1 Malta United Kingdom Special Relationship Istanbul Cooperation Initiative (ICI) (4) Contact Countries w/Tailored Co-op Pkgs Mediterranean Dialogue (MD) (7) Algeria Israel Mauritania Tunisia Bahrain Qatar Afghanistan Japan South Korea Egypt Jordan Morocco Kuwait UAE Australia New Zealand 1 Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Member (9) EU Candidates (3) 2 Invited to join NATO 3 Invitation to join NATO pending resolution of one issue * Turkey recognizes the Republic of Macedonia with its constitutional name As of 28 Sep 08 European & NATO cooperation structures 1. Setting the scene

  6. Communications Interoperability • Three aspects; Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability • Flexibility through large tuning ranges • Procurement plans not synchronised • Equipment will be in the inventory for a long time • Legacy versus increasing commercial use of wireless applications • Concept of operation is dependent on access to radio spectrum • Future concept of operation even more 1. Setting the scene

  7. Robustness of military radio services • Confidentiality and availability requirements are incompatible with efficient use of radio spectrum • Radio services are used for voice, data, multi media and radio determination transmissions • Radio determination systems must work in adverse propagation conditions and must be able to locate small objects often travelling at high speeds • Radio services must work in urban and rural environments all over the world • In the military effectiveness of radio services is the highest priority, efficiency comes second • Military radio services must cover spectrum from 9 KHz to 300 GHz 1. Setting the scene

  8. Mobility • Mobility of military communication systems versus commercial mobile users • Mission areas Desert Jungle Ocean Polar Urban 1. Setting the scene

  9. Radiospectrum occupancy part 1 • A typical radio spectrum graph made in an urban area. Notice the empty space in the band commonly allocated to military use in Europe Empty space here 2 Spectrum liberalisation aspects

  10. 200 – 400 MHz range Radiospectrum occupancy part 2 • Another radio spectrum graph made somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean. Notice the empty space in non-military bands Guess where the non-military bands are 2. Spectrum liberalisation aspects

  11. Spectrum occupancy conclusion • Both sectors (non-military and military) are unhappy with current frequency allocations • Both sectors see benefit in spectrum liberalisation leading to a situation where there is radio service and technology neutrality 2. Spectrum liberalisation aspects

  12. The road to radio spectrum liberalisation part 1 • Aim for harmonisation of spectrum for non-military and military applications/ radio services (e.g. GSM), • Aim for optimal spectrum efficiency within harmonised bands for each sector, • Wherever possible and useful introduce service and technology neutrality within harmonised spectrum bands for each sector (e.g. WAPECS), • Develop regulatory and legal framework to support these actions, • Develop technology and implement the regulatory framework to support the final goal of spectrum liberalisation for all applications regardless of sector. • Tadaaaa - Cognitive Radio (CR) 2. Spectrum liberalisation aspects

  13. Cognitive Radio and spectrum access Spectrum access CR implementation time Upward trend for both sectors due to better spectrum occupancy Downward trend for military Upward trend for non-military 2. Spectrum liberalisation aspects

  14. The road to radio spectrum liberalisation part 2 • However,.. questions need to be answered, for example; • What role do EC, ITU-R have to play? • Licences and CR? • Management of infrastructure in a CR environment? • Wireless versus wired/ fiber services (e.g. how does public radio through the air (terrestrial or satellite), internet, cable or mobile phone compare to making optimal use of radio spectrum?) • Can all radio services actually be implemented in a technology and service neutral environment? 2. Spectrum liberalisation aspects

  15. Preserving (national) security part 1 • National security is dependent on global stability • Military will need access to radio spectrum to do their job effectively in any mission area • Military must exercise in a realistic scenario near home base before operational employment, however, under constraining peace time conditions • Home base environment or peace time conditions are not the same as in the mission area • There is a limit to using commercial of the shelf products or non-military radio services 3. Preserving (national) security

  16. Preserving (national) security part 2 • Military are aware of radio spectrum scarcity in the bands that are useful to non-military use • Military are investigating and implementing equipment & procedures that lead to more efficient use of radio spectrum allocated to their forces • Dialogue with non-military sector and regulators leaves room for improvement • It might take a considerable amount of time before spectrum liberalisation will or can be implemented by both military and non-military sector 3. Preserving (national) security

  17. Preserving (national) security bottom line • If there were only such things as “global availability of radio networks”, “bandwidth on demand”, “hackproof/ certified quality of service” in combination with sound implementations of Cognitive Radio for all kinds of radio services, the military would not need spectrum allocations on an exclusive basis • But then again what other sector or radio service would need such an allocation? 3. Preserving (national) security

  18. Thank you • For listening to a SMA • Spectrum • Management • Amateur

More Related