1 / 8

Criticisms of the Ontological Argument

Criticisms of the Ontological Argument. Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, GE Moore Bertrand Russell. Aquinas. Human reason is fallible We cannot fully comprehend God – God is beyond human understanding A Priori knowledge is inadequate for gaining knowledge of God

laird
Download Presentation

Criticisms of the Ontological Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Criticisms of the Ontological Argument Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, GE Moore Bertrand Russell

  2. Aquinas • Human reason is fallible • We cannot fully comprehend God – God is beyond human understanding • A Priori knowledge is inadequate for gaining knowledge of God • Proof of God’s existence must come from inductive arguments based on A Posteriori knowledge

  3. Predicates? Kant claimed that a predicate tells us something about the subject – it adds to our idea of what the subject is like. To say “God exists” tells us nothing about God whereas God is angry does. • Bananas are yellow • Rhinos have horns • Giraffes have long necks • Snowflakes melt • God is angry • God exists

  4. Kant’s Objection • “existence is not a predicate” - it is not the same as red, green, large, small, happy, sad While it is impossible to separate subject from predicate in analytic statements, Unicorn Horn It is possible to deny the existence of both the subject & the predicate. The most we can infer is that if unicorns exist, they necessarily have horns Same is true of God: if there is a God, he necessarily exists.

  5. David Hume • Hume is an empiricist • ‘Knowledge’ must be provable using scientific methods • Evidence is needed to back up claims • No such thing as “necessary” existence – everything that exists is contingent. • He also said existence is not a predicate

  6. G.E. Moore • Some tame tigers do not growl • Some tame tigers do not exist • GE Moore reinforced what Kant argued • “Existence” does not work in the same way as other predicates. • “Existence” is a term used to refer to things existing in the universe.

  7. Bertrand Russell • The term “existence” refers to something which exists in the spacio-temporal world • Cows are brown • Cows are brown and exist • The second statement tells us nothing more than the 1st statement. • “existence” is not part of the description of a thing – it is an indication of its extension to reality. • Whether dragons exist or not has no impact on my idea of what a dragon is

  8. Russell cont… • The grammatical structure of a statement does not indicate its validity. • Men exist • SantaClaus is a man • Therefore Santa Claus exists Syllogism If we are to talk about something existing, we need to find evidence for it in the real (spacio-temporal) world

More Related