1 / 8

Provocative thoughts: teaching ethics to undergraduate bioscience students

Provocative thoughts: teaching ethics to undergraduate bioscience students. Dr. Tara Hurst Nottingham Trent University. Case 1: Use of animals in biotechnology. Module: Antibody and DNA Technology Level: 2 nd year undergraduates Format: part of lecture on antibody production.

laith-grant
Download Presentation

Provocative thoughts: teaching ethics to undergraduate bioscience students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Provocative thoughts:teaching ethics to undergraduate bioscience students Dr. Tara Hurst Nottingham Trent University

  2. Case 1: Use of animals in biotechnology • Module: Antibody and DNA Technology • Level: 2nd year undergraduates • Format: part of lecture on antibody production

  3. Ethical considerations: what is wrong with using ascites? • Injection of hybridomas into mouse peritoneum along with adjuvants: ascites fluid. • What is ascites fluid? Abdominal swelling

  4. Of mice and men: ascites fluid in humans • ‘beer belly’ – sign of liver disease, other gastrointestinal health problems • Also found in malnourished individuals

  5. Ethics • Use of animals: ethical treatment, aims to prevent suffering • Three R’s: • Reduce • Refine • Replace • Using non-ascites methods reduces number of animals used and reduces suffering since the initial immunisation should have only minimal side-effects (as in humans)

  6. Genetic testing • Module: Genetics and Immunology • Level: 1st year undergraduates • Format: question posed in advance on a hand-out given in a practical and discussed in the lecture

  7. Question 6 When is the genetic testing of children not appropriate?

  8. Answers to question 6 • There is no single correct answer. • This represents an ethical dilemma. Why? • Testing a child for a disease that only presents late in life could limit their life choices. • It also precludes the child deciding for themselves: the right to know or not know is taken away • The recommendations of the British Society for Human Genetics are: • Testing should be done if it will affect the treatment of the child and better management of their condition (e.g. PKU) • If the disease presents later in life or if the condition is associated with reproductive risks: • Testing should be approached with caution • Should preferentially be delayed until the child is old enough to decide for themselves.

More Related